Ontogeny and phylogeny of mating behaviour: social heteroch rony in primates.

Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.19272/202311402002
Fabien Génin, Hajarimanitra Rambeloarivony, Daniele Silvestro, Judith C Masters
{"title":"Ontogeny and phylogeny of mating behaviour: social heteroch rony in primates.","authors":"Fabien Génin,&nbsp;Hajarimanitra Rambeloarivony,&nbsp;Daniele Silvestro,&nbsp;Judith C Masters","doi":"10.19272/202311402002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Based on the Recognition Concept of species, the specific-mate contact model posits that mating systems develop as combinations of two fundamental courtship strategies that we interpret here in terms of behavioural heterochrony: territorial mate-attraction evolved as an effect of peramorphosis whereas group-living mate-seeking evolved as an effect of paedomorphosis. We tested this hypothesis on primates in a phylogenetic and paleo-climatic context. Our results suggest that primate promiscuity (both males and females are mate-seekers) evolved with group-living from ancestral pair-living monogamy (both males and females are mate-attractors) in the Palaeogene, as the result of a slowdown in growth (neoteny) caused by increased environmental predictability. A secondary return to territorial monogamy probably evolved as the result of accelerated growth driven by seasonality (acceleration). Polygamy evolved in the Neogene during periods of forest fragmentation and environmental unpredictability. Small monogamous ancestors evolved seasonal polyandry (female attraction) as an effect of truncated development (progenesis). Large promiscuous, neotenic ancestors evolved non-seasonal polygyny (male attraction) as an effect of prolonged development (hypermorphosis) in males. We conclude that social heterochrony offers alternative explanations for the coevolution of life history and mating be-haviour; and we discuss the implications of our model for human social evolution.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19272/202311402002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on the Recognition Concept of species, the specific-mate contact model posits that mating systems develop as combinations of two fundamental courtship strategies that we interpret here in terms of behavioural heterochrony: territorial mate-attraction evolved as an effect of peramorphosis whereas group-living mate-seeking evolved as an effect of paedomorphosis. We tested this hypothesis on primates in a phylogenetic and paleo-climatic context. Our results suggest that primate promiscuity (both males and females are mate-seekers) evolved with group-living from ancestral pair-living monogamy (both males and females are mate-attractors) in the Palaeogene, as the result of a slowdown in growth (neoteny) caused by increased environmental predictability. A secondary return to territorial monogamy probably evolved as the result of accelerated growth driven by seasonality (acceleration). Polygamy evolved in the Neogene during periods of forest fragmentation and environmental unpredictability. Small monogamous ancestors evolved seasonal polyandry (female attraction) as an effect of truncated development (progenesis). Large promiscuous, neotenic ancestors evolved non-seasonal polygyny (male attraction) as an effect of prolonged development (hypermorphosis) in males. We conclude that social heterochrony offers alternative explanations for the coevolution of life history and mating be-haviour; and we discuss the implications of our model for human social evolution.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
交配行为的个体发育和系统发育:灵长类动物的社会异位。
基于物种的识别概念,特定配偶接触模型假设交配系统是两种基本求爱策略的结合,我们在这里从行为异时性的角度来解释这两种策略:领地性配偶吸引是由大形态进化而来的,而群体生活的配偶寻求是由幼形态进化而来的。我们在灵长类动物的系统发育和古气候背景下测试了这一假设。我们的研究结果表明,灵长类动物的滥交行为(雄性和雌性都是求偶者)是在古近纪从祖先的一对生活的一夫一妻制(雄性和雌性都是求偶者)进化而来的,这是由于环境可预测性增加导致的生长放缓(生育期)的结果。第二次回归到领地一夫一妻制可能是由季节性驱动的加速生长的结果(加速)。一夫多妻制是在新近纪森林破碎化和环境不可预测时期演变而来的。小型的一夫一妻制祖先进化出季节性的多夫制(雌性吸引力),这是截断发育(后代)的结果。大型滥交的新生代祖先进化出了非季节性的一夫多妻制(雄性吸引力),这是雄性长时间发育(多形态)的结果。我们得出结论,社会异时性为生命史和交配行为的共同进化提供了另一种解释;我们还讨论了我们的模型对人类社会进化的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1