Evaluation of a leadership development impact assessment toolkit: a comparative case study of experts' perspectives in three Canadian provinces.

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Leadership in Health Services Pub Date : 2022-12-06 DOI:10.1108/LHS-06-2022-0068
Mehri Karimi-Dehkordi, Graham Dickson, Kelly Grimes, Suzanne Schell, Ivy Bourgeault
{"title":"Evaluation of a leadership development impact assessment toolkit: a comparative case study of experts' perspectives in three Canadian provinces.","authors":"Mehri Karimi-Dehkordi,&nbsp;Graham Dickson,&nbsp;Kelly Grimes,&nbsp;Suzanne Schell,&nbsp;Ivy Bourgeault","doi":"10.1108/LHS-06-2022-0068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This paper aims to explore users' perceptions of whether the Leadership Development Impact Assessment (LDI) Toolkit is valid, reliable, simple to use and cost-effective as a guide to its quality improvement.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>The Canadian Health Leadership Network codesigned and codeveloped the LDI Toolkit as a theory-driven and evidence-informed resource that aims to assist health-care organizational development practitioners to evaluate various programs at five levels of impact: reaction, learning, application, impact and return on investment (ROI) and intangible benefits. A comparative evaluative case study was conducted using online questionnaires and semistructured telephone interviews with three health organizations where robust leadership development programs were in place. A total of seven leadership consultants and specialists participated from three Canadian provinces. Data were analyzed sequentially in two stages involving descriptive statistical analysis augmented with a qualitative content analysis of key themes.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Users perceived the toolkit as cost-effective in terms of direct costs, indirect costs and intangibles; they found it easy-to-use in terms of clarity, logic and structure, ease of navigation with a coherent layout; and they assessed the sources of the evidence-informed tools and guides as appropriate. Users rated the toolkit highly on their perceptions of its validity and reliability. The analysis also informed the refinement of the toolkit.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>The refined LDI Toolkit is a comprehensive online collection of various tools to support health organizations to evaluate the leadership development investments effectively and efficiently at five impact levels including ROI.</p>","PeriodicalId":46165,"journal":{"name":"Leadership in Health Services","volume":"ahead-of-print ahead-of-print","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership in Health Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/LHS-06-2022-0068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to explore users' perceptions of whether the Leadership Development Impact Assessment (LDI) Toolkit is valid, reliable, simple to use and cost-effective as a guide to its quality improvement.

Design/methodology/approach: The Canadian Health Leadership Network codesigned and codeveloped the LDI Toolkit as a theory-driven and evidence-informed resource that aims to assist health-care organizational development practitioners to evaluate various programs at five levels of impact: reaction, learning, application, impact and return on investment (ROI) and intangible benefits. A comparative evaluative case study was conducted using online questionnaires and semistructured telephone interviews with three health organizations where robust leadership development programs were in place. A total of seven leadership consultants and specialists participated from three Canadian provinces. Data were analyzed sequentially in two stages involving descriptive statistical analysis augmented with a qualitative content analysis of key themes.

Findings: Users perceived the toolkit as cost-effective in terms of direct costs, indirect costs and intangibles; they found it easy-to-use in terms of clarity, logic and structure, ease of navigation with a coherent layout; and they assessed the sources of the evidence-informed tools and guides as appropriate. Users rated the toolkit highly on their perceptions of its validity and reliability. The analysis also informed the refinement of the toolkit.

Originality/value: The refined LDI Toolkit is a comprehensive online collection of various tools to support health organizations to evaluate the leadership development investments effectively and efficiently at five impact levels including ROI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
领导力发展影响评估工具的评估:加拿大三个省专家观点的比较案例研究。
目的:本文旨在探讨用户对领导力发展影响评估(LDI)工具包是否有效、可靠、易于使用和具有成本效益的看法,以指导其质量改进。设计/方法/方法:加拿大卫生领导网络共同设计和共同开发了LDI工具包,作为一种理论驱动和循证资源,旨在协助卫生保健组织发展从业人员在五个影响层面评估各种方案:反应、学习、应用、影响和投资回报率(ROI)以及无形效益。通过在线问卷调查和半结构化电话访谈,对三家实施了强有力的领导力发展计划的卫生组织进行了比较评估案例研究。来自加拿大三个省的七名领导顾问和专家参加了会议。数据分析顺序分为两个阶段,包括描述性统计分析和关键主题的定性内容分析。发现:用户认为该工具包在直接成本、间接成本和无形成本方面具有成本效益;他们发现它在清晰度、逻辑和结构方面易于使用,易于导航和连贯的布局;他们还酌情评估了循证工具和指南的来源。用户对该工具包的有效性和可靠性评价很高。分析还为改进工具包提供了信息。原创性/价值:经过改进的领导力发展工具包是各种工具的综合在线集合,可支持卫生组织在包括投资回报率在内的五个影响层面上有效和高效地评估领导力发展投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Leadership in Health Services
Leadership in Health Services HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
17.60%
发文量
51
期刊最新文献
Contexts and complexities: a realist evaluation of integrated care system leadership. Ethical leadership in health-care organizations - a scoping review. Leadership in federally qualified health centers: examining recruitment and retention in rural Oklahoma. A case study of a pilot leadership skills program to clarify professional fulfillment sources for academic physicians. Exploring the relationship between patient safety culture and the full-range leadership theory in primary care settings: a conceptual analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1