Using representational similarity analysis to reveal category and process specificity in visual object recognition

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Cortex Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2023.05.012
Bahareh Jozranjbar , Árni Kristjánsson , Randi Starrfelt , Christian Gerlach , Heida Maria Sigurdardottir
{"title":"Using representational similarity analysis to reveal category and process specificity in visual object recognition","authors":"Bahareh Jozranjbar ,&nbsp;Árni Kristjánsson ,&nbsp;Randi Starrfelt ,&nbsp;Christian Gerlach ,&nbsp;Heida Maria Sigurdardottir","doi":"10.1016/j.cortex.2023.05.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Cross-condition comparisons on neurodevelopmental conditions are central in neurodiversity research. In the realm of visual perception, the performance of participants with different category-specific disorders such as developmental prosopagnosia<span> (problems with faces) and dyslexia (problems with words) have contributed to understanding of perceptual processes involved in word and face recognition. Alterations in face and word recognition are present in several neurodiverse populations, and improved knowledge about their relationship may increase our understanding of this variability of impairment. The present study investigates organizing principles of visual object processing and their implications for developmental disorders of recognition. Some accounts suggest that distinct mechanisms are responsible for recognizing objects of different categories, while others propose that categories share or even compete for cortical resources. We took an individual differences approach to estimate the relationship between abilities in recognition. Neurotypical participants (</span></span><em>N</em> = 97 after outlier exclusion) performed a match-to-sample task with faces, houses, and pseudowords. Either individual features or feature configurations were manipulated. To estimate the separability of visual recognition mechanisms, we used representational similarity analysis (RSA) where correlational matrices for accuracy were compared to predicted data patterns. Recognition abilities separated into face recognition on one hand and house/pseudoword recognition on the other, indicating that face recognition may rely on relatively selective mechanisms in neurotypicals. We also found evidence for a general visual object recognition mechanism, while some combinations of category (faces, houses, words) and processing type (featural, configural) likely rely on additional mechanisms. Developmental conditions may therefore reflect combinations of impaired and intact aspects of specific and general visual object recognition mechanisms, where featural and configural processes for one object category separate from the featural or configural processing of another. More generally, RSA is a promising approach for advancing understanding of neurodiversity, including shared aspects and distinctions between neurodevelopmental conditions of visual recognition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10758,"journal":{"name":"Cortex","volume":"166 ","pages":"Pages 172-187"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cortex","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945223001387","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cross-condition comparisons on neurodevelopmental conditions are central in neurodiversity research. In the realm of visual perception, the performance of participants with different category-specific disorders such as developmental prosopagnosia (problems with faces) and dyslexia (problems with words) have contributed to understanding of perceptual processes involved in word and face recognition. Alterations in face and word recognition are present in several neurodiverse populations, and improved knowledge about their relationship may increase our understanding of this variability of impairment. The present study investigates organizing principles of visual object processing and their implications for developmental disorders of recognition. Some accounts suggest that distinct mechanisms are responsible for recognizing objects of different categories, while others propose that categories share or even compete for cortical resources. We took an individual differences approach to estimate the relationship between abilities in recognition. Neurotypical participants (N = 97 after outlier exclusion) performed a match-to-sample task with faces, houses, and pseudowords. Either individual features or feature configurations were manipulated. To estimate the separability of visual recognition mechanisms, we used representational similarity analysis (RSA) where correlational matrices for accuracy were compared to predicted data patterns. Recognition abilities separated into face recognition on one hand and house/pseudoword recognition on the other, indicating that face recognition may rely on relatively selective mechanisms in neurotypicals. We also found evidence for a general visual object recognition mechanism, while some combinations of category (faces, houses, words) and processing type (featural, configural) likely rely on additional mechanisms. Developmental conditions may therefore reflect combinations of impaired and intact aspects of specific and general visual object recognition mechanisms, where featural and configural processes for one object category separate from the featural or configural processing of another. More generally, RSA is a promising approach for advancing understanding of neurodiversity, including shared aspects and distinctions between neurodevelopmental conditions of visual recognition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用表征相似性分析揭示视觉对象识别的类别和过程特异性
神经发育状况的跨条件比较是神经多样性研究的核心。在视觉感知领域,患有不同类别特定障碍的参与者的表现,如发育性失认症(面部问题)和阅读障碍(单词问题),有助于理解单词和面部识别中涉及的感知过程。面部和单词识别的变化存在于几种神经多样性人群中,对它们关系的了解的提高可能会增加我们对这种损伤可变性的理解。本研究调查了视觉对象处理的组织原理及其对识别发育障碍的影响。一些观点认为,不同的机制负责识别不同类别的物体,而另一些观点则认为,类别共享甚至竞争皮层资源。我们采用个体差异的方法来估计识别能力之间的关系。神经典型参与者(排除异常值后N=97)使用人脸、房屋和假名进行匹配样本任务。操纵了单个特征或特征配置。为了估计视觉识别机制的可分性,我们使用了表示相似性分析(RSA),其中将准确性的相关矩阵与预测的数据模式进行比较。识别能力分为人脸识别和房屋/假名识别,这表明人脸识别可能依赖于神经正常人的相对选择性机制。我们还发现了通用视觉对象识别机制的证据,而类别(人脸、房屋、单词)和处理类型(自然、构形)的一些组合可能依赖于其他机制。因此,发育条件可能反映了特定和一般视觉对象识别机制的受损和完整方面的组合,其中一个对象类别的自然和结构过程与另一个对象的自然或结构过程分离。更普遍地说,RSA是一种很有前途的方法,可以促进对神经多样性的理解,包括视觉识别的神经发育条件之间的共同方面和区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cortex
Cortex 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
250
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: CORTEX is an international journal devoted to the study of cognition and of the relationship between the nervous system and mental processes, particularly as these are reflected in the behaviour of patients with acquired brain lesions, normal volunteers, children with typical and atypical development, and in the activation of brain regions and systems as recorded by functional neuroimaging techniques. It was founded in 1964 by Ennio De Renzi.
期刊最新文献
Shared body representation constraints in human and non-human primates behavior Exploring the development of past and future episodic memory in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: A preliminary longitudinal study Vertical neglect towards the lower space after bilateral parietal strokes – A case study Diminished sense of agency inhibits paretic upper-limb use in patients with post-stroke motor deficits EEG frequency tagging reveals the integration of dissimilar observed actions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1