Analysis of Regions of Interest and Distractor Regions in Breast Biopsy Images.

Ximing Lu, Sachin Mehta, Tad T Brunyé, Donald L Weaver, Joann G Elmore, Linda G Shapiro
{"title":"Analysis of Regions of Interest and Distractor Regions in Breast Biopsy Images.","authors":"Ximing Lu, Sachin Mehta, Tad T Brunyé, Donald L Weaver, Joann G Elmore, Linda G Shapiro","doi":"10.1109/bhi50953.2021.9508513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper studies why pathologists can misdiagnose diagnostically challenging breast biopsy cases, using a data set of 240 whole slide images (WSIs). Three experienced pathologists agreed on a consensus reference ground-truth diagnosis for each slide and also a consensus region of interest (ROI) from which the diagnosis could best be made. A study group of 87 other pathologists then diagnosed test sets (60 slides each) and marked their own regions of interest. Diagnoses and ROIs were categorized such that if on a given slide, their ROI differed from the consensus ROI and their diagnosis was incorrect, that ROI was called a distractor. We used the HATNet transformer-based deep learning classifier to evaluate the visual similarities and differences between the true (consensus) ROIs and the distractors. Results showed high accuracy for both the similarity and difference networks, showcasing the challenging nature of feature classification with breast biopsy images. This study is important in the potential use of its results for teaching pathologists how to diagnose breast biopsy slides.","PeriodicalId":72024,"journal":{"name":"... IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics. IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9801511/pdf/nihms-1859930.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"... IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics. IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/bhi50953.2021.9508513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper studies why pathologists can misdiagnose diagnostically challenging breast biopsy cases, using a data set of 240 whole slide images (WSIs). Three experienced pathologists agreed on a consensus reference ground-truth diagnosis for each slide and also a consensus region of interest (ROI) from which the diagnosis could best be made. A study group of 87 other pathologists then diagnosed test sets (60 slides each) and marked their own regions of interest. Diagnoses and ROIs were categorized such that if on a given slide, their ROI differed from the consensus ROI and their diagnosis was incorrect, that ROI was called a distractor. We used the HATNet transformer-based deep learning classifier to evaluate the visual similarities and differences between the true (consensus) ROIs and the distractors. Results showed high accuracy for both the similarity and difference networks, showcasing the challenging nature of feature classification with breast biopsy images. This study is important in the potential use of its results for teaching pathologists how to diagnose breast biopsy slides.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺活检图像中感兴趣区域和干扰区域的分析。
本文研究了为什么病理学家会误诊诊断具有挑战性的乳腺活检病例,使用了240个完整的幻灯片图像(wsi)的数据集。三位经验丰富的病理学家就每张幻灯片的基准诊断达成了共识,并就诊断最佳的兴趣区域(ROI)达成了共识。一个由87名病理学家组成的研究小组随后诊断了测试组(每个组60张幻灯片),并标记了他们感兴趣的区域。诊断和投资回报率被分类,如果在给定的幻灯片上,他们的投资回报率与共识投资回报率不同,他们的诊断是不正确的,投资回报率被称为分心。我们使用基于HATNet转换器的深度学习分类器来评估真实(共识)roi和干扰物之间的视觉相似性和差异性。结果显示,相似性和差异网络的准确率都很高,这显示了乳房活检图像特征分类的挑战性。这项研究的结果对于指导病理学家如何诊断乳腺活检片具有重要的潜在意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stratification and Survival Prediction for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patients Transcutaneous Cervical Vagus Nerve Stimulation Reduces Respiratory Variability in the Context of Opioid Withdrawal. Genomics transformer for diagnosing Parkinson's disease. Transcutaneous Cervical Vagus Nerve Stimulation Lengthens Exhalation in the Context of Traumatic Stress. Analysis of Regions of Interest and Distractor Regions in Breast Biopsy Images.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1