Acceptability of a task sharing and shifting model between family physicians and physiotherapists in French multidisciplinary primary healthcare centres: a cross-sectional survey.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Family Medicine and Community Health Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1136/fmch-2022-001644
Amélie Kechichian, François Desmeules, Pauline Girard, Nicolas Pinsault
{"title":"Acceptability of a task sharing and shifting model between family physicians and physiotherapists in French multidisciplinary primary healthcare centres: a cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Amélie Kechichian,&nbsp;François Desmeules,&nbsp;Pauline Girard,&nbsp;Nicolas Pinsault","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2022-001644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The rising prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders increases pressure on primary care services. In France, patients with musculoskeletal disorders are referred to physiotherapist (PT) by family physician (FP). To improve access to musculoskeletal care, a new model of task sharing and shifting is implemented between FPs and PTs for patients with acute low back pain. This new model enables French PTs to expand their usual scope of practice by receiving patients as first-contact practitioner, diagnosing low back pain, prescribing sick leave and analgesic medication. The aim of this study is to investigate the acceptability of FPs and PTs regarding this new model.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional survey design was used. Acceptability was measured using a questionnaire on the perception of the model and the perception of PTs' skills to manage low back pain. Descriptive analyses were performed to compare results among participants.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>French FPs and PTs working in multidisciplinary primary healthcare centres were invited to complete an online survey.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 174 respondents completed the survey (81 FPs and 85 PTs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A majority of participants had a positive perception of the task sharing and shifting model. A majority of the participants were mostly or totally favourable towards the implementation of the model (FPs: n=46, 82% and PTs: n=40, 82%). The perceived level of competencies of PTs to manage acute low back pain was high. The confidence level of FPs was higher than that of PTs regarding PTs' ability to adequately diagnose low back pain, refer patient to physiotherapy and prescribe sick leave or analgesic medication.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on this limited sample of participants, there appears to be good acceptability of the task sharing and shifting model for acute low back pain. Additional studies are needed to better determine the factors affecting the acceptability of such a model.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/11/77/fmch-2022-001644.PMC9204406.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2022-001644","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: The rising prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders increases pressure on primary care services. In France, patients with musculoskeletal disorders are referred to physiotherapist (PT) by family physician (FP). To improve access to musculoskeletal care, a new model of task sharing and shifting is implemented between FPs and PTs for patients with acute low back pain. This new model enables French PTs to expand their usual scope of practice by receiving patients as first-contact practitioner, diagnosing low back pain, prescribing sick leave and analgesic medication. The aim of this study is to investigate the acceptability of FPs and PTs regarding this new model.

Design: A cross-sectional survey design was used. Acceptability was measured using a questionnaire on the perception of the model and the perception of PTs' skills to manage low back pain. Descriptive analyses were performed to compare results among participants.

Setting: French FPs and PTs working in multidisciplinary primary healthcare centres were invited to complete an online survey.

Participants: A total of 174 respondents completed the survey (81 FPs and 85 PTs).

Results: A majority of participants had a positive perception of the task sharing and shifting model. A majority of the participants were mostly or totally favourable towards the implementation of the model (FPs: n=46, 82% and PTs: n=40, 82%). The perceived level of competencies of PTs to manage acute low back pain was high. The confidence level of FPs was higher than that of PTs regarding PTs' ability to adequately diagnose low back pain, refer patient to physiotherapy and prescribe sick leave or analgesic medication.

Conclusion: Based on this limited sample of participants, there appears to be good acceptability of the task sharing and shifting model for acute low back pain. Additional studies are needed to better determine the factors affecting the acceptability of such a model.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法国多学科初级保健中心家庭医生和物理治疗师之间任务分担和转移模式的可接受性:一项横断面调查。
目的:肌肉骨骼疾病患病率的上升增加了初级保健服务的压力。在法国,患有肌肉骨骼疾病的患者由家庭医生(FP)转介给物理治疗师(PT)。为了提高对肌肉骨骼护理的可及性,在急性腰痛患者的FPs和PTs之间实施了一种新的任务共享和转移模型。这种新模式使法国PTs能够扩大他们通常的实践范围,接收患者作为第一接触医生,诊断腰痛,开出病假和镇痛药物。本研究的目的是调查FPs和PTs对这种新模式的可接受性。设计:采用横断面调查设计。可接受性是通过对模型的感知和PTs管理腰痛技能的感知问卷来测量的。描述性分析用于比较参与者之间的结果。背景:邀请在多学科初级保健中心工作的法国FPs和pt完成一项在线调查。参与者:共有174名受访者完成了调查(81 FPs和85 PTs)。结果:大多数被试对任务分担和转移模式有积极的认知。大多数参与者大部分或完全赞成该模型的实施(FPs: n= 46.82%, PTs: n= 40.82%)。PTs管理急性腰痛的感知能力水平较高。在充分诊断腰痛、推荐患者进行物理治疗、开具病假或镇痛药方面,FPs的置信度高于PTs。结论:基于这个有限的参与者样本,对于急性腰痛的任务分担和转移模型似乎有很好的可接受性。需要进一步的研究来更好地确定影响这种模型可接受性的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine and Community Health (FMCH) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the topics of family medicine, general practice and community health. FMCH strives to be a leading international journal that promotes ‘Health Care for All’ through disseminating novel knowledge and best practices in primary care, family medicine, and community health. FMCH publishes original research, review, methodology, commentary, reflection, and case-study from the lens of population health. FMCH’s Asian Focus section features reports of family medicine development in the Asia-pacific region. FMCH aims to be an exemplary forum for the timely communication of medical knowledge and skills with the goal of promoting improved health care through the practice of family and community-based medicine globally. FMCH aims to serve a diverse audience including researchers, educators, policymakers and leaders of family medicine and community health. We also aim to provide content relevant for researchers working on population health, epidemiology, public policy, disease control and management, preventative medicine and disease burden. FMCH does not impose any article processing charges (APC) or submission charges.
期刊最新文献
The role of the primary healthcare research community in addressing the social and structural determinants of health: a call to action from NAPCRG 2023. Identification of research gaps to improve care for healthy ageing: a scoping review. Temporal trends and practice variation of paediatric diagnostic tests in primary care: retrospective analysis of 14 million tests. General practice trainee, supervisor and educator perspectives on the transitions in postgraduate training: a scoping review. Reducing strain on primary healthcare systems through innovative models of care: the impact of direct access physiotherapy for musculoskeletal conditions-an interrupted time series analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1