Objective: Diabetes remission has emerged as an achievable treatment goal, shifting the focus of care from increasing medication use to restoring metabolic health. While clinical trials show that remission is possible in controlled settings, evidence remains limited regarding its implementation in routine care within middle-income, rice-based dietary contexts. This study aims to explore healthcare provider experiences with implementing diabetes remission services in Thailand, focusing on dietary strategies, deprescription practices and patient management in routine care settings.
Design: Qualitative study using semi-structured, in-depth interviews, supplemented by structured questionnaires and programme documents.
Setting: Thirteen healthcare facilities across six Thai regions and two national-level professional or policy organisations.
Participants: 17 key informants purposively sampled for regional, institutional and professional diversity, including physicians, nurses, dietitians and national programme leaders. Data were collected and analysed iteratively until no new insights emerged. Thematic content analysis was conducted in QDA Miner Lite v3.0 with investigator triangulation.
Result: Five major themes emerged: key strengths, success factors, nutritional approaches and lifestyle modification, implementation challenges, and development strategies. Multidisciplinary teamwork, personalised care plans and regular monitoring facilitated service delivery. Culturally adapted dietary strategies, such as low-carbohydrate Thai-style meals and intermittent fasting, were widely used. Challenges included unclear clinical guidelines, limited staffing and technological disparities. Medication deprescription varied across sites due to the absence of standardised protocols. Healthcare providers emphasised the need for community engagement and policy support to enable scale-up. Real-world implementation of diabetes remission services is feasible but challenged by systemic constraints and contextual variability. Flexible, culturally tailored approaches, empowered care teams and supportive policy frameworks are essential for sustainability.
Conclusion: These findings provide practical insights for scaling remission programmes in other middle-income settings. Flexible, culturally tailored clinical pathways, empowered teams and supportive policy and financing are required to sustain outcomes and expand coverage.
目的:糖尿病缓解已成为一个可实现的治疗目标,将护理的重点从增加药物使用转移到恢复代谢健康。虽然临床试验表明,在控制环境中缓解是可能的,但在中等收入、以大米为基础的饮食环境中,在常规护理中实施的证据仍然有限。本研究旨在探讨在泰国实施糖尿病缓解服务的医疗保健提供者的经验,重点关注日常护理设置中的饮食策略,去处方实践和患者管理。设计:采用半结构化、深度访谈的定性研究,辅以结构化问卷调查和项目文件。环境:泰国6个地区的13个医疗机构和2个国家级专业或政策组织。参与者:17名关键信息提供者,包括医生、护士、营养师和国家规划负责人,有目的地进行区域、机构和专业多样性抽样。数据被反复收集和分析,直到没有新的见解出现。主题内容分析在QDA Miner Lite v3.0中使用调查员三角法进行。结果:出现了五个主要主题:主要优势、成功因素、营养方法和生活方式改变、实施挑战和发展战略。多学科团队合作、个性化护理计划和定期监测促进了服务的提供。适应文化的饮食策略,如低碳水化合物的泰式饮食和间歇性禁食,被广泛使用。挑战包括临床指南不明确、人员配备有限和技术差距。由于缺乏标准化的方案,各个地点的药物处方减少情况各不相同。医疗保健提供者强调需要社区参与和政策支持,以便扩大规模。现实世界中糖尿病缓解服务的实施是可行的,但受到系统限制和环境可变性的挑战。灵活的、有文化针对性的方法、授权的护理团队和支持性政策框架对于可持续性至关重要。结论:这些发现为在其他中等收入环境中扩大缓解方案提供了实际的见解。为了维持成果和扩大覆盖面,需要灵活的、有文化特色的临床途径、授权的团队以及支持性政策和融资。
{"title":"Insights into diabetes remission services: perspectives from general practitioners, family physicians and multidisciplinary teams.","authors":"Pichanun Mongkolsucharitkul, Preeyanan Chainarongloka, Rachata Walsri, Thiwat Sajjapanichkul, Sureeporn Pumeiam, Theerapat Thearachote, Puwadol Polpuak, Akapol Phisarn, Supachai Krobtrakulchai, Jatuphoom Neelasri, Krisada Hanbunjerd, Korrakot Weratean, Korapat Mayurasakorn","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2025-003631","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2025-003631","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Diabetes remission has emerged as an achievable treatment goal, shifting the focus of care from increasing medication use to restoring metabolic health. While clinical trials show that remission is possible in controlled settings, evidence remains limited regarding its implementation in routine care within middle-income, rice-based dietary contexts. This study aims to explore healthcare provider experiences with implementing diabetes remission services in Thailand, focusing on dietary strategies, deprescription practices and patient management in routine care settings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative study using semi-structured, in-depth interviews, supplemented by structured questionnaires and programme documents.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Thirteen healthcare facilities across six Thai regions and two national-level professional or policy organisations.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>17 key informants purposively sampled for regional, institutional and professional diversity, including physicians, nurses, dietitians and national programme leaders. Data were collected and analysed iteratively until no new insights emerged. Thematic content analysis was conducted in QDA Miner Lite v3.0 with investigator triangulation.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Five major themes emerged: key strengths, success factors, nutritional approaches and lifestyle modification, implementation challenges, and development strategies. Multidisciplinary teamwork, personalised care plans and regular monitoring facilitated service delivery. Culturally adapted dietary strategies, such as low-carbohydrate Thai-style meals and intermittent fasting, were widely used. Challenges included unclear clinical guidelines, limited staffing and technological disparities. Medication deprescription varied across sites due to the absence of standardised protocols. Healthcare providers emphasised the need for community engagement and policy support to enable scale-up. Real-world implementation of diabetes remission services is feasible but challenged by systemic constraints and contextual variability. Flexible, culturally tailored approaches, empowered care teams and supportive policy frameworks are essential for sustainability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings provide practical insights for scaling remission programmes in other middle-income settings. Flexible, culturally tailored clinical pathways, empowered teams and supportive policy and financing are required to sustain outcomes and expand coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145745006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-09DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2025-003524
Gene Rusty Kallenberg
{"title":"A message from the departure lounge.","authors":"Gene Rusty Kallenberg","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2025-003524","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2025-003524","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145716144","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-27DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2025-003627
Julia Morgner, Marcus Heise, Celina Wiens, Felix Bauch, Andreas Wienke, Thomas Frese, Solveig Weise
Objective: Demographic changes, increasing prevalence of chronically ill and multimorbid patients and the ongoing shortage of general practitioners (GPs) collectively present significant challenges for European general practice. Task delegation from GP to practice nurse (PN)-led patient consultations could be a potential solution to tackle those challenges.Therefore, this study aimed to examine the attitudes of GPs and PNs towards PN-led consultations in general and for specific conditions.
Design: Cross-sectional survey using a self-developed, pretested questionnaire, conducted between September 2023 and November 2024. The questionnaire assessed attitudes towards PN-led consultations, conditions within PN-led consultations, possible benefits and concerns regarding PN-led consultations, sociodemographic characteristics and characteristics on GP offices (GPOs). We performed descriptive statistics, univariable and multivariable regression analyses using SPSS V.27.
Setting: GPOs located in the German federal states of Saxony-Anhalt and Saxony.
Participant: From 2071 contacted GPOs, 437 GPs and 339 PNs participated (GP response rate: 21.1%).
Results: The majority of GPs (61.7%) and PNs (61.2%) were open towards PN-led consultations. In multivariable analysis, GPs showed greater openness if they had prior positive delegation experiences (OR=5.88, 95% CI (3.01 to 11.48)) or already delegated special tasks (OR= 5.34, 95% CI (2.29 to 12.46)). GPs were less open if they worked in urban GPOs (OR=0.44, 95% CI (0.22 to 0.88)) or owned a single GPO (OR=0.41, 95% CI (0.20 to 0.83)). In multivariable analysis, PNs were more open towards PN-led consultations if they had prior positive delegation experiences (OR=3.03, 95% CI (1.12 to 8.18)) and advanced PN training (OR=3.50, 95% CI (1.44; 8.51)).The three most accepted conditions by GPs and PNs for PN-led consultations were chronic wounds, diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension.
Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate broad openness among both GPs and PNs towards PN-led consultations in German GPOs in general, and for various acute and chronic conditions. PN-led consultations are already partially practised. The results indicate considerable potential for further delegation beyond current national agreements.Future pilot studies should further develop PN roles and provide evidence of feasibility and non-inferiority of PN-led consultations compared to GP-led consultations. Conditions and participant characteristics investigated may serve as a foundation for study design and participant recruitment.
{"title":"Are nurse-led patient consultations acceptable for the general practitioners and practice nurses in Germany? Results from a cross-sectional survey in two federal states.","authors":"Julia Morgner, Marcus Heise, Celina Wiens, Felix Bauch, Andreas Wienke, Thomas Frese, Solveig Weise","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2025-003627","DOIUrl":"10.1136/fmch-2025-003627","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Demographic changes, increasing prevalence of chronically ill and multimorbid patients and the ongoing shortage of general practitioners (GPs) collectively present significant challenges for European general practice. Task delegation from GP to practice nurse (PN)-led patient consultations could be a potential solution to tackle those challenges.Therefore, this study aimed to examine the attitudes of GPs and PNs towards PN-led consultations in general and for specific conditions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey using a self-developed, pretested questionnaire, conducted between September 2023 and November 2024. The questionnaire assessed attitudes towards PN-led consultations, conditions within PN-led consultations, possible benefits and concerns regarding PN-led consultations, sociodemographic characteristics and characteristics on GP offices (GPOs). We performed descriptive statistics, univariable and multivariable regression analyses using SPSS V.27.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>GPOs located in the German federal states of Saxony-Anhalt and Saxony.</p><p><strong>Participant: </strong>From 2071 contacted GPOs, 437 GPs and 339 PNs participated (GP response rate: 21.1%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of GPs (61.7%) and PNs (61.2%) were open towards PN-led consultations. In multivariable analysis, GPs showed greater openness if they had prior positive delegation experiences (OR=5.88, 95% CI (3.01 to 11.48)) or already delegated special tasks (OR= 5.34, 95% CI (2.29 to 12.46)). GPs were less open if they worked in urban GPOs (OR=0.44, 95% CI (0.22 to 0.88)) or owned a single GPO (OR=0.41, 95% CI (0.20 to 0.83)). In multivariable analysis, PNs were more open towards PN-led consultations if they had prior positive delegation experiences (OR=3.03, 95% CI (1.12 to 8.18)) and advanced PN training (OR=3.50, 95% CI (1.44; 8.51)).The three most accepted conditions by GPs and PNs for PN-led consultations were chronic wounds, diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings demonstrate broad openness among both GPs and PNs towards PN-led consultations in German GPOs in general, and for various acute and chronic conditions. PN-led consultations are already partially practised. The results indicate considerable potential for further delegation beyond current national agreements.Future pilot studies should further develop PN roles and provide evidence of feasibility and non-inferiority of PN-led consultations compared to GP-led consultations. Conditions and participant characteristics investigated may serve as a foundation for study design and participant recruitment.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12666028/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145640848","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-27DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2025-003426
Dongwook Kim, Andre Peri, Natalie Marker
Objective: The primary objective was to evaluate the impact of clinical decision support (CDS) tool integration into primary care visits on depression screening and follow-up rates and to assess whether CDS use improves adherence to Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) guidelines for depression screening and follow-up.
Design: This quality improvement evaluation study employed quantitative and qualitative components conducted in parallel to provide complementary insights. Modified Poisson regression with generalised estimating equation (GEE) was used to assess the association between CDS tool use and meeting HRSA criteria for depression screening and follow-up. In addition, semi-structured interviews explored perspectives on the implementation and utility of CDS tools.
Setting: This study was conducted at a federally qualified health centre in Minnesota.
Participant: The dataset included 12 338 patient encounters attributed to 8647 unique patients, covering 2 years of data. Five care providers were recruited through purposive sampling for the semi-structured interviews.
Result: CDS use was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of meeting HRSA depression screening and follow-up criteria (relative risk 1.44, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.55; p<0.001). Qualitative findings suggested that while providers found CDS tools useful, workflow challenges and human-centred practices shaped their effectiveness.
Conclusion: Integrating CDS tools into primary care workflows can enhance adherence to depression screening and follow-up guidelines. However, their effectiveness relies on supportive person-centred approaches, including collaboration and previsit preparation. These findings highlight the need for a balanced approach that integrates technological interventions with human interaction to enhance clinical practices. Future research should investigate how CDS tools are used in practice, address barriers to their adoption and develop strategies to promote their broader use while fostering continued learning among providers.
目的:主要目的是评估临床决策支持(CDS)工具整合到初级保健就诊中对抑郁症筛查和随访率的影响,并评估CDS的使用是否提高了对卫生资源和服务管理局(HRSA)抑郁症筛查和随访指南的依从性。设计:本质量改进评估研究采用并行进行的定量和定性组件,以提供互补的见解。采用广义估计方程(GEE)的修正泊松回归来评估CDS工具的使用与满足HRSA抑郁症筛查和随访标准之间的关系。此外,半结构化访谈探讨了CDS工具的实现和效用的观点。环境:本研究在明尼苏达州一家联邦认证的健康中心进行。参与者:数据集包括12338例患者就诊,归属于8647例独特患者,涵盖2年的数据。通过有目的的抽样,招募了5名护理人员进行半结构化访谈。结果:CDS的使用与满足HRSA抑郁症筛查和随访标准的可能性增加显著相关(相对风险1.44,95% CI 1.34至1.55)。结论:将CDS工具整合到初级保健工作流程中可以提高对抑郁症筛查和随访指南的依从性。然而,它们的有效性依赖于支持性的以人为本的方法,包括协作和访前准备。这些发现强调需要一种平衡的方法,将技术干预与人类互动结合起来,以加强临床实践。未来的研究应该调查CDS工具在实践中是如何使用的,解决采用它们的障碍,并制定战略,促进它们的更广泛使用,同时促进提供者之间的持续学习。
{"title":"Leveraging clinical decision support to improve depression screening and follow-up: insights from a quality improvement case study.","authors":"Dongwook Kim, Andre Peri, Natalie Marker","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2025-003426","DOIUrl":"10.1136/fmch-2025-003426","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective was to evaluate the impact of clinical decision support (CDS) tool integration into primary care visits on depression screening and follow-up rates and to assess whether CDS use improves adherence to Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) guidelines for depression screening and follow-up.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This quality improvement evaluation study employed quantitative and qualitative components conducted in parallel to provide complementary insights. Modified Poisson regression with generalised estimating equation (GEE) was used to assess the association between CDS tool use and meeting HRSA criteria for depression screening and follow-up. In addition, semi-structured interviews explored perspectives on the implementation and utility of CDS tools.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study was conducted at a federally qualified health centre in Minnesota.</p><p><strong>Participant: </strong>The dataset included 12 338 patient encounters attributed to 8647 unique patients, covering 2 years of data. Five care providers were recruited through purposive sampling for the semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>CDS use was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of meeting HRSA depression screening and follow-up criteria (relative risk 1.44, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.55; p<0.001). Qualitative findings suggested that while providers found CDS tools useful, workflow challenges and human-centred practices shaped their effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating CDS tools into primary care workflows can enhance adherence to depression screening and follow-up guidelines. However, their effectiveness relies on supportive person-centred approaches, including collaboration and previsit preparation. These findings highlight the need for a balanced approach that integrates technological interventions with human interaction to enhance clinical practices. Future research should investigate how CDS tools are used in practice, address barriers to their adoption and develop strategies to promote their broader use while fostering continued learning among providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12666039/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145640796","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-24DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2025-003575
Imaan Bayoumi, Kimberley Mcfadden, Helen Valkanas, Karen Tu, Sumeet Kalia, Tao Chen, Chelsea D Christie, James Rourke, Leslie Rourke, Michelle Greiver, Denis Leduc, Patricia Li
Background: Well child visits (WCV) are fundamental to preventive primary care. We examined trends in WCV attendance during the COVID-19 pandemic and characterised variation by patient and provider characteristics.
Methods: Deidentified electronic medical records from two academic practice-based research networks in Ontario were used to create age-specific cohorts of children under age six attending WCVs from 2015 to 2022. Patients' residential postal codes were linked to neighbourhood-level measures to estimate socioeconomic status. Monthly visit rates were modelled using segmented linear regression with autoregressive residuals. Changes associated with COVID-19 were assessed using level change and trend change of monthly visit rates.
Findings: For the 53 256 included children, WCV attendance increased from 2015 to 2020 for cohorts aged 15 months and younger and was stable for 18-month, 2-3-year and 4-6-year visits. The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with decreased WCV attendance in all ages except ages 1-2 weeks, 1 month, 12 months, 15 months and 18 months, in whom attendance was unchanged. The rate of change in WCV attendance rates pre-COVID-19 compared with post-COVID-19 was unchanged, with the exception of increased rate of change for the 1-2 weeks and 2-3 years old cohorts. Lower attendance rates were observed in children residing in neighbourhoods with the highest material deprivation, rural regions and those whose family physicians were men or older than 65 years.
Interpretation: Prepandemic gains in WCV attendance were stable or improved after the initial reductions observed at the pandemic onset, suggesting that WCVs were prioritised by family physicians and families. Targeted strategies are needed to improve WCV attendance for vulnerable groups.
{"title":"Trends in missed paediatric preventive primary care visits during the COVID-19 pandemic using routinely collected electronic medical records in Ontario, Canada (2015-2022).","authors":"Imaan Bayoumi, Kimberley Mcfadden, Helen Valkanas, Karen Tu, Sumeet Kalia, Tao Chen, Chelsea D Christie, James Rourke, Leslie Rourke, Michelle Greiver, Denis Leduc, Patricia Li","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2025-003575","DOIUrl":"10.1136/fmch-2025-003575","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Well child visits (WCV) are fundamental to preventive primary care. We examined trends in WCV attendance during the COVID-19 pandemic and characterised variation by patient and provider characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Deidentified electronic medical records from two academic practice-based research networks in Ontario were used to create age-specific cohorts of children under age six attending WCVs from 2015 to 2022. Patients' residential postal codes were linked to neighbourhood-level measures to estimate socioeconomic status. Monthly visit rates were modelled using segmented linear regression with autoregressive residuals. Changes associated with COVID-19 were assessed using level change and trend change of monthly visit rates.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>For the 53 256 included children, WCV attendance increased from 2015 to 2020 for cohorts aged 15 months and younger and was stable for 18-month, 2-3-year and 4-6-year visits. The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with decreased WCV attendance in all ages except ages 1-2 weeks, 1 month, 12 months, 15 months and 18 months, in whom attendance was unchanged. The rate of change in WCV attendance rates pre-COVID-19 compared with post-COVID-19 was unchanged, with the exception of increased rate of change for the 1-2 weeks and 2-3 years old cohorts. Lower attendance rates were observed in children residing in neighbourhoods with the highest material deprivation, rural regions and those whose family physicians were men or older than 65 years.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Prepandemic gains in WCV attendance were stable or improved after the initial reductions observed at the pandemic onset, suggesting that WCVs were prioritised by family physicians and families. Targeted strategies are needed to improve WCV attendance for vulnerable groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12658507/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145606654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-11DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2025-003628
Ashley Collazo, Paige Wermuth, Johanan Luna Rodriguez, Kiara Olmeda, Azalia Mancera, Fabrizia Faustinella, Michael K Paasche-Orlow, Roger Zoorob, Barbara Wells Trautner, Larissa Grigoryan
Background/objective: Patients often expect antibiotics for self-limiting diseases, pressuring providers to prescribe antibiotics unnecessarily. These expectations also contribute to the unsafe practice of taking antibiotics without a prescription (non-prescription use), such as pills retained from prior prescriptions or antibiotics from non-medical sources. Previous work shows that non-prescription use is due to strong, widely held misconceptions regarding the curative power of antibiotics. To reduce unnecessary use of antibiotics, we developed and pilot-tested a patient-focused, bilingual (English and Spanish) educational tool with patient and provider stakeholder input. The tool, a trifold brochure, included information on safe antibiotic use, potential antibiotic harms and symptom management with over-the-counter medications.
Design: Using a qualitative design, we conducted a two-phase study to (1) develop a provider-patient communication tool and (2) pilot-test the tool in primary care clinics. Development of the tool involved patient advisory board meetings and healthcare professional (HCP) focus groups. Pilot-testing of the tool was done through semistructured interviews of randomly recruited patients from primary clinic waiting rooms and their providers.
Setting: Publicly funded safety net primary care clinics in Texas.
Participants: Patients (n=18) and HCPs (nurses, medical assistants, pharmacists, nurse practitioners and physicians) (n=14) from participating clinics.
Result: Themes were extracted from the qualitative data. Main themes from the development phase highlighted the need to create a simple tool to make it clear that antibiotics are not used to treat viral infections, pain or allergies and that using antibiotics without consulting a medical professional is not safe. During pilot-testing, providers noted the tool helped adjust patients' antibiotic expectations. Providers felt that the tool gave them credibility in scenarios where antibiotics were not indicated. Patients felt that the tool provided alternatives to antibiotics for symptom relief. Patients and providers found the tool useful in supporting patient-provider communication around antibiotic use.
Conclusions: A stakeholder-driven, patient-focused educational tool addressing inappropriate antibiotic use facilitated patient-provider communication around antibiotic usage and helped manage patients' antibiotic expectations. Embedding this tool into a community-facing intervention may reduce use of antibiotics without a prescription.
{"title":"'In Texas, everybody wants antibiotics': reducing inappropriate antibiotic expectations and use with a provider-patient communication tool in primary care.","authors":"Ashley Collazo, Paige Wermuth, Johanan Luna Rodriguez, Kiara Olmeda, Azalia Mancera, Fabrizia Faustinella, Michael K Paasche-Orlow, Roger Zoorob, Barbara Wells Trautner, Larissa Grigoryan","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2025-003628","DOIUrl":"10.1136/fmch-2025-003628","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>Patients often expect antibiotics for self-limiting diseases, pressuring providers to prescribe antibiotics unnecessarily. These expectations also contribute to the unsafe practice of taking antibiotics without a prescription (non-prescription use), such as pills retained from prior prescriptions or antibiotics from non-medical sources. Previous work shows that non-prescription use is due to strong, widely held misconceptions regarding the curative power of antibiotics. To reduce unnecessary use of antibiotics, we developed and pilot-tested a patient-focused, bilingual (English and Spanish) educational tool with patient and provider stakeholder input. The tool, a trifold brochure, included information on safe antibiotic use, potential antibiotic harms and symptom management with over-the-counter medications.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Using a qualitative design, we conducted a two-phase study to (1) develop a provider-patient communication tool and (2) pilot-test the tool in primary care clinics. Development of the tool involved patient advisory board meetings and healthcare professional (HCP) focus groups. Pilot-testing of the tool was done through semistructured interviews of randomly recruited patients from primary clinic waiting rooms and their providers.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Publicly funded safety net primary care clinics in Texas.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients (n=18) and HCPs (nurses, medical assistants, pharmacists, nurse practitioners and physicians) (n=14) from participating clinics.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Themes were extracted from the qualitative data. Main themes from the development phase highlighted the need to create a simple tool to make it clear that antibiotics are not used to treat viral infections, pain or allergies and that using antibiotics without consulting a medical professional is not safe. During pilot-testing, providers noted the tool helped adjust patients' antibiotic expectations. Providers felt that the tool gave them credibility in scenarios where antibiotics were not indicated. Patients felt that the tool provided alternatives to antibiotics for symptom relief. Patients and providers found the tool useful in supporting patient-provider communication around antibiotic use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A stakeholder-driven, patient-focused educational tool addressing inappropriate antibiotic use facilitated patient-provider communication around antibiotic usage and helped manage patients' antibiotic expectations. Embedding this tool into a community-facing intervention may reduce use of antibiotics without a prescription.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12606499/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145497173","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Limited evidence has investigated the effect of a healthy lifestyle on mortality in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to assess the relationship between a healthy lifestyle and all-cause mortality in IBD, as well as the underlying metabolic mechanisms in a prospective cohort.
Methods: Overall, 5052 IBD patients free of cancer (aged 57.0±8.0 years, 48.5% men) were included from UK Biobank cohort. A healthy lifestyle was defined as a normal body mass index, never smoking, moderate alcohol consumption, regular physical activity, adequate sleep duration and healthy diet. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Lifestyle-related metabolic signatures were constructed by linear regression and elastic net regression in patients with metabolomics data. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess associations between lifestyle, metabolic signature and all-cause mortality. The mediation effect of lifestyle-related metabolic signatures was estimated through the Cox marginal structural model.
Results: During a median of 14.6 years' follow-up, 583 deaths were identified. Compared with unfavourable lifestyle, those with favourable lifestyle showed significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality in IBD (HR=0.56, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.68), ulcerative colitis (UC) (HR=0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.79) and Crohn's disease (HR=0.49, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.67), and 18.9% of the reduced risk was mediated by metabolic signature. Metabolic signature was significantly associated with lower all-cause mortality, with HR of 0.65 (95%CI 0.49 to 0.85) for values above versus below the median and 0.73 (95%CI 0.64 to 0.83) for per SD increase. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses demonstrated similar results.
Conclusion: A healthy lifestyle is associated with lower mortality in IBD patients. This beneficial effect may be mediated by metabolic signatures and related to favourable metabolic alterations.
背景:关于健康生活方式对炎症性肠病(IBD)患者死亡率影响的研究证据有限。我们旨在评估健康生活方式与IBD全因死亡率之间的关系,以及潜在的代谢机制。方法:从UK Biobank队列中共纳入5052例无癌IBD患者(年龄57.0±8.0岁,男性48.5%)。健康的生活方式被定义为正常的身体质量指数、从不吸烟、适度饮酒、有规律的体育活动、充足的睡眠时间和健康的饮食。主要结局为全因死亡率。利用代谢组学数据对患者进行线性回归和弹性网回归,构建与生活方式相关的代谢特征。采用多变量Cox比例风险模型评估生活方式、代谢特征和全因死亡率之间的关系。通过Cox边际结构模型估计生活方式相关代谢特征的中介作用。结果:在中位14.6年的随访期间,确定了583例死亡。与不良生活方式相比,生活方式良好的患者IBD (HR=0.56, 95% CI 0.46 ~ 0.68)、溃疡性结肠炎(UC) (HR=0.61, 95% CI 0.48 ~ 0.79)和克罗恩病(HR=0.49, 95% CI 0.36 ~ 0.67)全因死亡风险显著降低,其中18.9%的风险降低是由代谢特征介导的。代谢特征与较低的全因死亡率显著相关,高于中位数的HR为0.65 (95%CI 0.49 ~ 0.85),低于中位数的HR为0.73 (95%CI 0.64 ~ 0.83)。亚组分析和敏感性分析显示了相似的结果。结论:健康的生活方式与IBD患者较低的死亡率相关。这种有益的作用可能是由代谢特征介导的,并与有利的代谢改变有关。
{"title":"Association of healthy lifestyle, metabolic alterations and lower mortality risk of IBD patients: a prospective cohort and mediation analysis.","authors":"Qian Zhang, Si Liu, Shengtao Zhu, Jing Wu, Shutian Zhang, Shanshan Wu","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2025-003514","DOIUrl":"10.1136/fmch-2025-003514","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited evidence has investigated the effect of a healthy lifestyle on mortality in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to assess the relationship between a healthy lifestyle and all-cause mortality in IBD, as well as the underlying metabolic mechanisms in a prospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Overall, 5052 IBD patients free of cancer (aged 57.0±8.0 years, 48.5% men) were included from UK Biobank cohort. A healthy lifestyle was defined as a normal body mass index, never smoking, moderate alcohol consumption, regular physical activity, adequate sleep duration and healthy diet. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Lifestyle-related metabolic signatures were constructed by linear regression and elastic net regression in patients with metabolomics data. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess associations between lifestyle, metabolic signature and all-cause mortality. The mediation effect of lifestyle-related metabolic signatures was estimated through the Cox marginal structural model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a median of 14.6 years' follow-up, 583 deaths were identified. Compared with unfavourable lifestyle, those with favourable lifestyle showed significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality in IBD (HR=0.56, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.68), ulcerative colitis (UC) (HR=0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.79) and Crohn's disease (HR=0.49, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.67), and 18.9% of the reduced risk was mediated by metabolic signature. Metabolic signature was significantly associated with lower all-cause mortality, with HR of 0.65 (95%CI 0.49 to 0.85) for values above versus below the median and 0.73 (95%CI 0.64 to 0.83) for per SD increase. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses demonstrated similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A healthy lifestyle is associated with lower mortality in IBD patients. This beneficial effect may be mediated by metabolic signatures and related to favourable metabolic alterations.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12603704/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145490438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-05DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2025-003512
Michael Boah, Callixte Cyuzuzo, Francois Uwinkindi, Chester Kalinda, Tsion Yohannes, Carolyn Greig, Justine Davies, Lisa R Hirschhorn, Alemayehu Amberbir
Objective: As populations age, multimorbidity and frailty have emerged as major health challenges. While their associations with disability and mortality are well documented, their impact on quality of life (QoL) in sub-Saharan Africa remains underexplored. We examined the associations between frailty, multimorbidity and QoL among older adults in Rwanda.
Design: A cross-sectional population-based study. Multimorbidity was defined as having two or more chronic conditions, including hypertension, diabetes, heart disease and mental health conditions. Frailty scores were derived using the Fried phenotype, and QoL was measured using the European Health Instrument Survey-Quality of Life index (scaled 0%-100%). Sequential linear regression models were used to examine independent associations.
Setting: Rural and urban settings of Rwanda.
Participant: We analysed data from 4369 adults (≥40 years).
Results: The mean QoL score was 48.2% (±15.6). Frailty and multimorbidity prevalence were 14.5% (95% CI 13.5 to 15.6) and 55.2% (95% CI 53.7 to 56.6), respectively, while 55.0% (95% CI 53.3 to 56.3) were classified as prefrail. Frailty and multimorbidity are independently associated with poorer QoL. Compared with robust individuals, prefrail and frail individuals experienced a 3.66 (95% CI -4.63 to -2.70) and 7.30 (95% CI -8.76 to -5.83) percentage point reduction in QoL, respectively. Multimorbidity was associated with a 4.66% (95% CI -5.54 to -3.79) point decrease in QoL. Impairments in activities of daily living partly mediated these associations.
Conclusions: Frailty and multimorbidity showed a strong negative association with QoL, with frailty having a stronger effect. These findings underscore the need for age-responsive healthcare strategies, including frailty screening and integrated chronic care, to enhance QoL among older adults in Rwanda.
目的:随着人口老龄化,多病和虚弱已成为主要的健康挑战。虽然它们与残疾和死亡率的关系有充分的记录,但它们对撒哈拉以南非洲生活质量(QoL)的影响仍未得到充分探讨。我们研究了卢旺达老年人虚弱、多病和生活质量之间的关系。设计:以人群为基础的横断面研究。多病被定义为患有两种或两种以上的慢性疾病,包括高血压、糖尿病、心脏病和精神健康状况。虚弱评分采用Fried表型推导,生活质量采用欧洲健康仪器调查-生活质量指数(比例为0%-100%)测量。序贯线性回归模型用于检验独立关联。环境:卢旺达的农村和城市环境。参与者:我们分析了4369名成年人(≥40岁)的数据。结果:平均生活质量评分为48.2%(±15.6)。虚弱和多病患病率分别为14.5% (95% CI 13.5 ~ 15.6)和55.2% (95% CI 53.7 ~ 56.6), 55.0% (95% CI 53.3 ~ 56.3)属于易弱。虚弱和多病与较差的生活质量独立相关。与健康个体相比,体弱和体弱个体的生活质量分别降低了3.66 (95% CI -4.63至-2.70)和7.30 (95% CI -8.76至-5.83)个百分点。多重发病与生活质量下降4.66% (95% CI -5.54 ~ -3.79)点相关。日常生活活动的障碍部分介导了这些关联。结论:体弱多病与生活质量呈显著负相关,体弱多病对生活质量的影响更大。这些研究结果强调需要针对年龄的医疗保健战略,包括虚弱筛查和综合慢性护理,以提高卢旺达老年人的生活质量。
{"title":"Frailty, multimorbidity and quality of life in an ageing population in Africa: a cross-sectional, population-based study in rural and urban Rwanda.","authors":"Michael Boah, Callixte Cyuzuzo, Francois Uwinkindi, Chester Kalinda, Tsion Yohannes, Carolyn Greig, Justine Davies, Lisa R Hirschhorn, Alemayehu Amberbir","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2025-003512","DOIUrl":"10.1136/fmch-2025-003512","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>As populations age, multimorbidity and frailty have emerged as major health challenges. While their associations with disability and mortality are well documented, their impact on quality of life (QoL) in sub-Saharan Africa remains underexplored. We examined the associations between frailty, multimorbidity and QoL among older adults in Rwanda.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional population-based study. Multimorbidity was defined as having two or more chronic conditions, including hypertension, diabetes, heart disease and mental health conditions. Frailty scores were derived using the Fried phenotype, and QoL was measured using the European Health Instrument Survey-Quality of Life index (scaled 0%-100%). Sequential linear regression models were used to examine independent associations.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Rural and urban settings of Rwanda.</p><p><strong>Participant: </strong>We analysed data from 4369 adults (≥40 years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean QoL score was 48.2% (±15.6). Frailty and multimorbidity prevalence were 14.5% (95% CI 13.5 to 15.6) and 55.2% (95% CI 53.7 to 56.6), respectively, while 55.0% (95% CI 53.3 to 56.3) were classified as prefrail. Frailty and multimorbidity are independently associated with poorer QoL. Compared with robust individuals, prefrail and frail individuals experienced a 3.66 (95% CI -4.63 to -2.70) and 7.30 (95% CI -8.76 to -5.83) percentage point reduction in QoL, respectively. Multimorbidity was associated with a 4.66% (95% CI -5.54 to -3.79) point decrease in QoL. Impairments in activities of daily living partly mediated these associations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frailty and multimorbidity showed a strong negative association with QoL, with frailty having a stronger effect. These findings underscore the need for age-responsive healthcare strategies, including frailty screening and integrated chronic care, to enhance QoL among older adults in Rwanda.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506473/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145240077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-29DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2025-003470
Den-Ching A Lee, Taya A Collyer, Grant Russell, Nadine E Andrew, Claire M C O'Connor, Keith D Hill, Kate Swaffer, Natasha Layton, Velandai Srikanth, Barbara Barbosa Neves, Lee-Fay Low, Yalchin Oytam, Galina Daraganova, Catherine Devanny, Michele L Callisaya
Objective: To examine general practitioners' (GPs) referral patterns to allied health services for people with dementia compared with those without dementia across two large Australian Primary Health Networks (PHNs).
Design: A retrospective cohort study using routinely collected general practice data. Logistic regression was used to compare odds of allied health referrals, adjusting for age, sex and socioeconomic status.
Setting: De-identified patient and episode activity data from 537 GP practices across two PHNs in Australia between 2018 and 2023.
Participants: Data from 1 153 304 patients and 28 667 517 GP episodes of care were analysed. After merging records, 693 328 unique patients were identified, including 16 610 patients with dementia. Subcohorts included patients with dementia, stroke, Parkinson's disease and combinations of these conditions.
Results: The dementia cohort (n=16 610) had a similar overall allied health referral rate (36.1%) to the control cohort (n=48 977) (35.4%). Patients with dementia only were significantly less likely to receive any allied health referral compared with those with stroke (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.76, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.80; p<0.001) or Parkinson's disease (aOR 0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.78; p<0.001). Those with dementia and stroke were also less likely to receive referrals than those with stroke only (aOR 0.71, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.82; p<0.001). No significant difference was found between dementia with Parkinson's and Parkinson's only groups (p=0.48). Patients with dementia were consistently less likely to be referred to key allied health services (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Despite strong evidence supporting allied health interventions for dementia, referral rates remain comparatively low. Enhancing GP referral resources and education, integrating dementia-specific care pathways and implementing supportive policy changes are needed to improve access and equity in dementia care.
{"title":"Referrals to allied health professionals for people with dementia: an analysis of general practitioner data from two Australian primary health networks.","authors":"Den-Ching A Lee, Taya A Collyer, Grant Russell, Nadine E Andrew, Claire M C O'Connor, Keith D Hill, Kate Swaffer, Natasha Layton, Velandai Srikanth, Barbara Barbosa Neves, Lee-Fay Low, Yalchin Oytam, Galina Daraganova, Catherine Devanny, Michele L Callisaya","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2025-003470","DOIUrl":"10.1136/fmch-2025-003470","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine general practitioners' (GPs) referral patterns to allied health services for people with dementia compared with those without dementia across two large Australian Primary Health Networks (PHNs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study using routinely collected general practice data. Logistic regression was used to compare odds of allied health referrals, adjusting for age, sex and socioeconomic status.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>De-identified patient and episode activity data from 537 GP practices across two PHNs in Australia between 2018 and 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Data from 1 153 304 patients and 28 667 517 GP episodes of care were analysed. After merging records, 693 328 unique patients were identified, including 16 610 patients with dementia. Subcohorts included patients with dementia, stroke, Parkinson's disease and combinations of these conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dementia cohort (n=16 610) had a similar overall allied health referral rate (36.1%) to the control cohort (n=48 977) (35.4%). Patients with dementia only were significantly less likely to receive any allied health referral compared with those with stroke (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.76, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.80; p<0.001) or Parkinson's disease (aOR 0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.78; p<0.001). Those with dementia and stroke were also less likely to receive referrals than those with stroke only (aOR 0.71, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.82; p<0.001). No significant difference was found between dementia with Parkinson's and Parkinson's only groups (p=0.48). Patients with dementia were consistently less likely to be referred to key allied health services (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite strong evidence supporting allied health interventions for dementia, referral rates remain comparatively low. Enhancing GP referral resources and education, integrating dementia-specific care pathways and implementing supportive policy changes are needed to improve access and equity in dementia care.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481295/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145201422","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-25DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2025-003555
Annette Corraro, Luigi Maria Bracchitta, Martina Consoloni, Pier Mannuccio Mannucci, Alessandro Nobili
{"title":"What do future general practitioners think about their training pathway? Findings from a nationwide survey in Italy.","authors":"Annette Corraro, Luigi Maria Bracchitta, Martina Consoloni, Pier Mannuccio Mannucci, Alessandro Nobili","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2025-003555","DOIUrl":"10.1136/fmch-2025-003555","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481394/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145150550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}