Dialectics of Sign and Symbol and the Utterance of Archetype Theory

IF 0.5 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-08-02 DOI:10.1111/1468-5922.12942
Raya Jones
{"title":"Dialectics of Sign and Symbol and the Utterance of Archetype Theory","authors":"Raya Jones","doi":"10.1111/1468-5922.12942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Debates surrounding Jung’s archetype theory could be characterized as tacit attempts to contend with the concept’s dual function as referring to something known to psychologists (sign) and standing for something that is fundamentally unknowable (symbol). This essay considers implications of the term “archetype,” outlines and critiques some of the conundrums of categorization and scientific credibility posed by Jung’s formulation of the theory, and prompts locating the archetypal “human quality” of being human in imaginaries of typical patterning of the experiential realm.</p>","PeriodicalId":45420,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL PSYCHOLOGY","volume":"68 4","pages":"687-705"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-5922.12942","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL PSYCHOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-5922.12942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Debates surrounding Jung’s archetype theory could be characterized as tacit attempts to contend with the concept’s dual function as referring to something known to psychologists (sign) and standing for something that is fundamentally unknowable (symbol). This essay considers implications of the term “archetype,” outlines and critiques some of the conundrums of categorization and scientific credibility posed by Jung’s formulation of the theory, and prompts locating the archetypal “human quality” of being human in imaginaries of typical patterning of the experiential realm.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
符号与符号的辩证法与原型理论的表达
围绕荣格原型理论的争论可以被描述为暗中试图与概念的双重功能相抗衡,即指心理学家已知的东西(符号)和代表根本不可知的东西(符号)。本文考虑了“原型”一词的含义,概述和批评了荣格的理论提出的分类和科学可信度的一些难题,并提示在经验领域的典型模式的想象中定位人类的原型“人类品质”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL PSYCHOLOGY
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL PSYCHOLOGY PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
115
期刊介绍: The Journal of Analytical Psychology is the foremost international Jungian publication in English. Commissioned by the Society of Analytical Psychology in London, the editorial board includes leading analysts from the UK, Europe and the USA, in collaboration with Jungian analysts from around the world. Clinical and theoretical articles, book and journal reviews, and a lively correspondence section reflect international developments and current controversies in analytical psychology and Jungian thinking. The journal is renowned for its exploration of the relationship between analytical psychology and psychoanalysis. It also addresses issues on the leading edge of philosophy, science, religion, and an understanding of the arts.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The Umbilical1 THE JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL PSYCHOLOGY INDEX FOR VOLUME 69, 2024 Disputed Boundaries of the Self, the Group, and their Environment: What We Learn from Refugees about our Psychic Functioning1 Stolen Identities, Suspended Lives. Embodied Active Imagination in Clinical Work with Victims of State Terrorism1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1