Evaluating methodologies for species delimitation: the mismatch between phenotypes and genotypes in lichenized fungi (Bryoria sect. Implexae, Parmeliaceae).

IF 9.5 1区 生物学 Q1 MYCOLOGY Persoonia Pub Date : 2019-06-01 Epub Date: 2018-08-23 DOI:10.3767/persoonia.2019.42.04
C G Boluda, V J Rico, P K Divakar, O Nadyeina, L Myllys, R T McMullin, J C Zamora, C Scheidegger, D L Hawksworth
{"title":"Evaluating methodologies for species delimitation: the mismatch between phenotypes and genotypes in lichenized fungi (<i>Bryoria</i> sect. <i>Implexae</i>, <i>Parmeliaceae</i>).","authors":"C G Boluda, V J Rico, P K Divakar, O Nadyeina, L Myllys, R T McMullin, J C Zamora, C Scheidegger, D L Hawksworth","doi":"10.3767/persoonia.2019.42.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In many lichen-forming fungi, molecular phylogenetic analyses lead to the discovery of cryptic species within traditional morphospecies. However, in some cases, molecular sequence data also questions the separation of phenotypically characterised species. Here we apply an integrative taxonomy approach - including morphological, chemical, molecular, and distributional characters - to re-assess species boundaries in a traditionally speciose group of hair lichens, <i>Bryoria</i> sect. <i>Implexae</i>. We sampled multilocus sequence and microsatellite data from 142 specimens from a broad intercontinental distribution. Molecular data included DNA sequences of the standard fungal markers ITS, IGS, <i>GAPDH</i>, two newly tested loci (FRBi15 and FRBi16), and SSR frequencies from 18 microsatellite markers. Datasets were analysed with Bayesian and maximum likelihood phylogenetic reconstruction, phenogram reconstruction, STRUCTURE Bayesian clustering, principal coordinate analysis, haplotype network, and several different species delimitation analyses (ABGD, PTP, GMYC, and DISSECT). Additionally, past population demography and divergence times are estimated. The different approaches to species recognition do not support the monophyly of the 11 currently accepted morphospecies, and rather suggest the reduction of these to four phylogenetic species. Moreover, three of these are relatively recent in origin and cryptic, including phenotypically and chemically variable specimens. Issues regarding the integration of an evolutionary perspective into taxonomic conclusions in species complexes, which have undergone recent diversification, are discussed. The four accepted species, all epitypified by sequenced material, are <i>Bryoria fuscescens</i>, <i>B. glabra</i>, <i>B. kockiana</i>, and <i>B. pseudofuscescens</i>. Ten species rank names are reduced to synonymy. In the absence of molecular data, they can be recorded as the <i>B. fuscescens</i> complex. Intraspecific phenotype plasticity and factors affecting the speciation of different morphospecies in this group of <i>Bryoria</i> are outlined.</p>","PeriodicalId":20014,"journal":{"name":"Persoonia","volume":"42 ","pages":"75-100"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a8/05/per-42-75.PMC6712543.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Persoonia","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2019.42.04","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MYCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In many lichen-forming fungi, molecular phylogenetic analyses lead to the discovery of cryptic species within traditional morphospecies. However, in some cases, molecular sequence data also questions the separation of phenotypically characterised species. Here we apply an integrative taxonomy approach - including morphological, chemical, molecular, and distributional characters - to re-assess species boundaries in a traditionally speciose group of hair lichens, Bryoria sect. Implexae. We sampled multilocus sequence and microsatellite data from 142 specimens from a broad intercontinental distribution. Molecular data included DNA sequences of the standard fungal markers ITS, IGS, GAPDH, two newly tested loci (FRBi15 and FRBi16), and SSR frequencies from 18 microsatellite markers. Datasets were analysed with Bayesian and maximum likelihood phylogenetic reconstruction, phenogram reconstruction, STRUCTURE Bayesian clustering, principal coordinate analysis, haplotype network, and several different species delimitation analyses (ABGD, PTP, GMYC, and DISSECT). Additionally, past population demography and divergence times are estimated. The different approaches to species recognition do not support the monophyly of the 11 currently accepted morphospecies, and rather suggest the reduction of these to four phylogenetic species. Moreover, three of these are relatively recent in origin and cryptic, including phenotypically and chemically variable specimens. Issues regarding the integration of an evolutionary perspective into taxonomic conclusions in species complexes, which have undergone recent diversification, are discussed. The four accepted species, all epitypified by sequenced material, are Bryoria fuscescens, B. glabra, B. kockiana, and B. pseudofuscescens. Ten species rank names are reduced to synonymy. In the absence of molecular data, they can be recorded as the B. fuscescens complex. Intraspecific phenotype plasticity and factors affecting the speciation of different morphospecies in this group of Bryoria are outlined.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估物种划分方法:地衣化真菌(Bryoria sect. Implexae, Parmeliaceae)表型与基因型之间的不匹配。
在许多地衣形成真菌中,分子系统发育分析导致在传统形态种中发现了隐生物种。然而,在某些情况下,分子序列数据也会对表型特征物种的分离提出质疑。在此,我们采用一种综合分类方法--包括形态、化学、分子和分布特征--来重新评估毛地黄中一个传统的物种群--Bryoria sect.Implexae。我们从洲际分布广泛的 142 个标本中采集了多焦点序列和微卫星数据。分子数据包括标准真菌标记 ITS、IGS、GAPDH、两个新测试位点(FRBi15 和 FRBi16)的 DNA 序列以及 18 个微卫星标记的 SSR 频率。对数据集进行了贝叶斯和最大似然系统发育重建、表型图重建、STRUCTURE 贝叶斯聚类、主坐标分析、单体型网络和几种不同的物种划分分析(ABGD、PTP、GMYC 和 DISSECT)。此外,还对过去种群的人口分布和分化时间进行了估计。不同的物种识别方法并不支持目前公认的 11 个形态种的单系性,而是建议将这些形态种简化为 4 个系统发育种。此外,其中 3 个物种起源较新,具有隐蔽性,包括表型和化学性质多变的标本。本文讨论了将进化观点纳入物种复合体分类结论的问题,这些物种复合体经历了近期的多样化。四个公认的物种均由测序材料确定,它们是 Bryoria fuscescens、B. glabra、B. kockiana 和 B. pseudofuscescens。有 10 个物种的名称被简化为同义词。fuscescens complex。概述了种内表型的可塑性以及影响这组 Bryoria 不同形态种的物种分化的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Persoonia
Persoonia MYCOLOGY-
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
10
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Persoonia aspires to publish papers focusing on the molecular systematics and evolution of fungi. Additionally, it seeks to advance fungal taxonomy by employing a polythetic approach to elucidate the genuine phylogeny and relationships within the kingdom Fungi. The journal is dedicated to disseminating high-quality papers that unravel both known and novel fungal taxa at the DNA level. Moreover, it endeavors to provide fresh insights into evolutionary processes and relationships. The scope of papers considered encompasses research articles, along with topical and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
A comprehensive molecular phylogeny of Cephalotrichum and Microascus provides novel insights into their systematics and evolutionary history Single host plant species may harbour more than one species of Peronospora – a case study on Peronospora infecting Plantag Phylogenomic analysis of the Candida auris- Candida haemuli clade and related taxa in the Metschnikowiaceae, and proposal of thirteen new genera, fifty-five new combinations and nine new species Endless forms most frustrating: disentangling species boundaries in the Ramalina decipiens group (Lecanoromycetes, Ascomycota), with the description of six new species and a key to the group Saccharomycetaceae: delineation of fungal genera based on phylogenomic analyses, genomic relatedness indices and genomics-based synapomorphies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1