The ABCD grading system in assessment of corneal cross-linking effect in keratoconus with different cone locations

IF 2.2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Optometry Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.optom.2021.09.002
Iva Krolo , Aida Kasumović , Ines Matoc , Ivan Sabol , Ivana Radman , Mirko Ratković
{"title":"The ABCD grading system in assessment of corneal cross-linking effect in keratoconus with different cone locations","authors":"Iva Krolo ,&nbsp;Aida Kasumović ,&nbsp;Ines Matoc ,&nbsp;Ivan Sabol ,&nbsp;Ivana Radman ,&nbsp;Mirko Ratković","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2021.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The aim of this study was to analyse the postoperative corneal cross-linking results of corneal parameters and the ABCD grading system, depending on the cone location.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Thirty eyes of 25 patients with keratoconus (KC), who received the corneal cross-linking (CXL) treatment, were included in this study. The exclusion criteria were: patients under 18 years of age, corneal pachymetry less than 400 μm, corneal scarring, history of ocular trauma, history of ocular surgery, and corneal pathology other than KC. Patients were examined at the baseline visit, and followed-up at three, six, and twelve months after the CXL. All patients underwent visual acuity and Scheimpflug tomography at all visits. Progression parameters, keratometries, and ABCD grading were compared between the visits. Patients were classified into two groups: central and paracentral cones group (within the central 5 mm corneal zone) and peripheral cones group (outside the central 5 mm corneal zone), based on X-Y coordinates of maximal keratometry (Kmax).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Parameter A remained relatively stable throughout the follow-up period in both groups. Parameter B and parameter C showed a significant increase in both groups postoperatively. Parameter D showed stability at the 6-month post-CXL visit in the peripheral KC group, while the central and paracentral KC group showed improvement at the 12-month post-CXL visit.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There was no significant difference in the postoperative response between different cone locations in the ABCD grading system, when classifying according to the Kmax, except an earlier recovery of the parameter D in peripherally located cones.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d2/46/main.PMC9811369.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429621000583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to analyse the postoperative corneal cross-linking results of corneal parameters and the ABCD grading system, depending on the cone location.

Methods

Thirty eyes of 25 patients with keratoconus (KC), who received the corneal cross-linking (CXL) treatment, were included in this study. The exclusion criteria were: patients under 18 years of age, corneal pachymetry less than 400 μm, corneal scarring, history of ocular trauma, history of ocular surgery, and corneal pathology other than KC. Patients were examined at the baseline visit, and followed-up at three, six, and twelve months after the CXL. All patients underwent visual acuity and Scheimpflug tomography at all visits. Progression parameters, keratometries, and ABCD grading were compared between the visits. Patients were classified into two groups: central and paracentral cones group (within the central 5 mm corneal zone) and peripheral cones group (outside the central 5 mm corneal zone), based on X-Y coordinates of maximal keratometry (Kmax).

Results

Parameter A remained relatively stable throughout the follow-up period in both groups. Parameter B and parameter C showed a significant increase in both groups postoperatively. Parameter D showed stability at the 6-month post-CXL visit in the peripheral KC group, while the central and paracentral KC group showed improvement at the 12-month post-CXL visit.

Conclusion

There was no significant difference in the postoperative response between different cone locations in the ABCD grading system, when classifying according to the Kmax, except an earlier recovery of the parameter D in peripherally located cones.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ABCD分级系统评价圆锥角膜不同锥位角膜交联效果
目的本研究的目的是分析术后角膜交联结果的角膜参数和ABCD分级系统,取决于锥的位置。方法对25例圆锥角膜(KC)患者30眼进行角膜交联(CXL)治疗。排除标准为:18岁以下、角膜厚度小于400μm、角膜瘢痕形成、眼外伤史、眼部手术史和KC以外的角膜病理学患者。患者在基线访视时接受检查,并在CXL后的三个月、六个月和十二个月进行随访。所有患者均接受了视力检查和Scheimpflug断层扫描。比较两次访视之间的进展参数、角膜曲率计和ABCD分级。根据最大角膜曲率(Kmax)的X-Y坐标,将患者分为两组:中心锥和中心旁锥组(角膜中心区内)和外周锥组(中央区外)。参数B和参数C在两组患者术后均有明显增加。外周KC组的参数D在CXL访视后6个月时显示稳定,而中枢和中央旁KC组在CXL访问后12个月时表现改善。结论在ABCD分级系统中,当根据Kmax进行分类时,不同锥体位置的术后反应没有显著差异,除了位于外周的锥体的参数D更早恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Optometry
Journal of Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Analysis of patient referrals from primary care to ophthalmology. The role of the optometrist Corneal higher-order aberrations in different types of irregular cornea Intraocular pressure and its association with ocular biometrics in Iranian children Comparison of macular thickness in diabetic patients acquired from optical coherence tomography mode and optical coherence tomography angiography mode in Cirrus HD-OCT 5000 JOptom's Web of Science (WoS) impact factor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1