Strategies and attitudes on the management of myopia in clinical practice in Spain

IF 2.2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Optometry Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.optom.2022.03.002
Clara Martínez-Pérez , César Villa-Collar , Jacinto Santodomingo-Rubido , James S. Wolffsohn
{"title":"Strategies and attitudes on the management of myopia in clinical practice in Spain","authors":"Clara Martínez-Pérez ,&nbsp;César Villa-Collar ,&nbsp;Jacinto Santodomingo-Rubido ,&nbsp;James S. Wolffsohn","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2022.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>In 2019, an international survey was conducted to evaluate strategies and attitudes in the management of myopia in clinical practice worldwide. This study reports on the results found in Spain and how these results compare with those from other regions of the world.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A self-administrated, internet-based questionnaire was distributed to eye care professionals around the world through professional associations. The questions examined were based on the available strategies and their use.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 173 Spanish optometrists, of the 1,336 practitioners from the five different continents who participated in the study, responded to the online survey. Spain, Asia and South America were found among the regions with the highest concern regarding the increased incidence of myopia (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.001). However, in these regions, the prescription of single-vision spectacles and single-vision contact lenses continues to be the main methods of visual correction prescribed to young myopic patients (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.001). Spanish practitioners, like those from other regions, considered orthokeratology to be the most effective treatment to control myopia progression (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.001). The major reasons why Spanish practitioners were not prescribing myopia control strategies were increased cost, inadequate information and unpredictable outcomes (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The uptake of myopia control methods by Spanish practitioners is relatively low, despite the increase in the prevalence of paediatric myopia as well as increased concern and perceived clinical activity in the area in recent years.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"16 1","pages":"Pages 64-73"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7d/cc/main.PMC9811371.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429622000164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objective

In 2019, an international survey was conducted to evaluate strategies and attitudes in the management of myopia in clinical practice worldwide. This study reports on the results found in Spain and how these results compare with those from other regions of the world.

Methods

A self-administrated, internet-based questionnaire was distributed to eye care professionals around the world through professional associations. The questions examined were based on the available strategies and their use.

Results

A total of 173 Spanish optometrists, of the 1,336 practitioners from the five different continents who participated in the study, responded to the online survey. Spain, Asia and South America were found among the regions with the highest concern regarding the increased incidence of myopia (p ≤ 0.001). However, in these regions, the prescription of single-vision spectacles and single-vision contact lenses continues to be the main methods of visual correction prescribed to young myopic patients (p ≤ 0.001). Spanish practitioners, like those from other regions, considered orthokeratology to be the most effective treatment to control myopia progression (p ≤ 0.001). The major reasons why Spanish practitioners were not prescribing myopia control strategies were increased cost, inadequate information and unpredictable outcomes (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The uptake of myopia control methods by Spanish practitioners is relatively low, despite the increase in the prevalence of paediatric myopia as well as increased concern and perceived clinical activity in the area in recent years.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西班牙临床近视管理的策略和态度
目的2019年,进行了一项国际调查,以评估全球临床实践中近视管理的策略和态度。这项研究报告了在西班牙发现的结果,以及这些结果与世界其他地区的结果的比较。方法通过专业协会向世界各地的眼科护理专业人员发放一份基于互联网的自我管理问卷。所审查的问题是根据现有的战略及其使用情况提出的。结果来自五大洲的1336名医生中,共有173名西班牙验光师对在线调查做出了回应。西班牙、亚洲和南美洲是近视发病率增加最受关注的地区之一(p≤0.001)。然而,在这些地区,单眼眼镜和单眼隐形眼镜仍然是年轻近视患者的主要视力矫正方法(p≤001),与其他地区的医生一样,他们认为角膜塑形术是控制近视进展的最有效治疗方法(p≤0.001)。西班牙医生没有制定近视控制策略的主要原因是成本增加,信息不足和结果不可预测(p<;0.05)。结论尽管近年来该地区儿童近视的患病率有所上升,人们对近视控制方法的关注和感知也有所增加,但西班牙医生对近视控制措施的接受率相对较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Optometry
Journal of Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Blue light stimulation of the optic nerve head reduces melatonin levels in rabbit posterior segment Effect of a vergence-accommodation conflict induced during a 30-minute Virtual Reality game on vergence-accommodation parameters and related symptoms Visual performance of a new trifocal intraocular lens design evaluated with a clinical adaptative optics visual simulator Analysis of patient referrals from primary care to ophthalmology. The role of the optometrist Corneal higher-order aberrations in different types of irregular cornea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1