Association of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio with Diabetic Kidney Disease in Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/TCRM.S393135
Lan Li, Qing Shen, Sijie Rao
{"title":"Association of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio with Diabetic Kidney Disease in Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Lan Li,&nbsp;Qing Shen,&nbsp;Sijie Rao","doi":"10.2147/TCRM.S393135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been extensively studied in a variety of diseases. However, research on their relationship with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is limited. The aim of our study was to investigate the association between these two indicators and renal function in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes and assess whether they can serve as predictors of DKD. Methods This cross-sectional study enrolled 655 Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. Subjects were divided into three groups according to the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR). The differences in the NLR and PLR among the groups and their correlation with renal function were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze independent risk factors for DKD, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the predictive values of the NLR and PLR for the disease. Results The NLR and PLR were significantly different among the three groups, and they increased with increasing levels of albuminuria. Pearson’s correlation analysis showed that the NLR and PLR were positively correlated with the UACR but negatively correlated with the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (p<0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that these two indicators were independent risk factors for DKD (p<0.001). The results of ROC curve analysis suggested that the NLR (AUC=0.794; 95% CI, 0.760–0.827; p<0.001) and PLR (AUC=0.665; 95% CI, 0.623–0.706, p<0.001) had important diagnostic value for DKD. Conclusion The NLR and PLR were closely associated with renal function among Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes, and high NLR and PLR values may serve as predictors of DKD.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/83/ae/tcrm-18-1157.PMC9805708.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S393135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been extensively studied in a variety of diseases. However, research on their relationship with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is limited. The aim of our study was to investigate the association between these two indicators and renal function in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes and assess whether they can serve as predictors of DKD. Methods This cross-sectional study enrolled 655 Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. Subjects were divided into three groups according to the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR). The differences in the NLR and PLR among the groups and their correlation with renal function were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze independent risk factors for DKD, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the predictive values of the NLR and PLR for the disease. Results The NLR and PLR were significantly different among the three groups, and they increased with increasing levels of albuminuria. Pearson’s correlation analysis showed that the NLR and PLR were positively correlated with the UACR but negatively correlated with the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (p<0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that these two indicators were independent risk factors for DKD (p<0.001). The results of ROC curve analysis suggested that the NLR (AUC=0.794; 95% CI, 0.760–0.827; p<0.001) and PLR (AUC=0.665; 95% CI, 0.623–0.706, p<0.001) had important diagnostic value for DKD. Conclusion The NLR and PLR were closely associated with renal function among Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes, and high NLR and PLR values may serve as predictors of DKD.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国2型糖尿病患者中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率和血小板与淋巴细胞比率与糖尿病肾病的关系:一项横断面研究
目的:中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)在多种疾病中得到了广泛的研究。然而,关于它们与糖尿病肾病(DKD)关系的研究有限。我们的研究目的是探讨这两个指标与中国2型糖尿病患者肾功能之间的关系,并评估它们是否可以作为DKD的预测指标。方法:本横断面研究纳入655例中国2型糖尿病患者。根据尿白蛋白与肌酐比值(UACR)将受试者分为三组。分析各组NLR、PLR的差异及其与肾功能的相关性。采用Logistic回归分析分析DKD的独立危险因素,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估NLR和PLR对疾病的预测价值。结果:三组患者NLR、PLR差异有统计学意义,且随蛋白尿水平升高而升高。Pearson相关分析显示NLR和PLR与UACR呈正相关,与肾小球滤过率(glomerular filtration rate, eGFR)估测值呈负相关(ppppp)。结论:中国2型糖尿病患者NLR和PLR与肾功能密切相关,高NLR和PLR值可作为DKD的预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1