No increased prevalence of prosopagnosia in aphantasia: Visual recognition deficits are small and not restricted to faces.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Perception Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1177/03010066231180712
Merlin Monzel, Annabel Vetterlein, Svea A Hogeterp, Martin Reuter
{"title":"No increased prevalence of prosopagnosia in aphantasia: Visual recognition deficits are small and not restricted to faces.","authors":"Merlin Monzel,&nbsp;Annabel Vetterlein,&nbsp;Svea A Hogeterp,&nbsp;Martin Reuter","doi":"10.1177/03010066231180712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aphantasia and prosopagnosia are both rare conditions with impairments in visual cognition. While prosopagnosia refers to a face recognition deficit, aphantasics exhibit a lack of mental imagery. Current object recognition theories propose an interplay of perception and mental representations, making an association between recognition performance and visual imagery plausible. While the literature assumes a link between aphantasia and prosopagnosia, other impairments in aphantasia have been shown to be rather global. Therefore, we assumed that aphantasics do not solely exhibit impairments in face recognition but rather in general visual recognition performance, probably moderated by stimulus complexity. To test this hypothesis, 65 aphantasics were compared to 55 controls in a face recognition task, the Cambridge Face Memory Test, and a corresponding object recognition task, the Cambridge Car Memory Test. In both tasks, aphantasics performed worse than controls, indicating mild recognition deficits without face-specificity. Additional correlations between imagery vividness and performance in both tasks were found, suggesting that visual imagery influences visual recognition not only in imagery extremes. Stimulus complexity produced the expected moderation effect but only for the whole imagery-spectrum and only with face stimuli. Overall, the results imply that aphantasia is linked to a general but mild deficit in visual recognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":49708,"journal":{"name":"Perception","volume":"52 9","pages":"629-644"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perception","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066231180712","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Aphantasia and prosopagnosia are both rare conditions with impairments in visual cognition. While prosopagnosia refers to a face recognition deficit, aphantasics exhibit a lack of mental imagery. Current object recognition theories propose an interplay of perception and mental representations, making an association between recognition performance and visual imagery plausible. While the literature assumes a link between aphantasia and prosopagnosia, other impairments in aphantasia have been shown to be rather global. Therefore, we assumed that aphantasics do not solely exhibit impairments in face recognition but rather in general visual recognition performance, probably moderated by stimulus complexity. To test this hypothesis, 65 aphantasics were compared to 55 controls in a face recognition task, the Cambridge Face Memory Test, and a corresponding object recognition task, the Cambridge Car Memory Test. In both tasks, aphantasics performed worse than controls, indicating mild recognition deficits without face-specificity. Additional correlations between imagery vividness and performance in both tasks were found, suggesting that visual imagery influences visual recognition not only in imagery extremes. Stimulus complexity produced the expected moderation effect but only for the whole imagery-spectrum and only with face stimuli. Overall, the results imply that aphantasia is linked to a general but mild deficit in visual recognition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
失视症中面孔失认症的患病率没有增加:视觉识别缺陷很小,并不局限于面部。
失视症和面孔失认症都是视觉认知障碍的罕见疾病。面孔失认症指的是面部识别缺陷,而幻觉则表现为缺乏心理意象。当前的物体识别理论提出了感知和心理表征的相互作用,使得识别表现和视觉图像之间的联系变得可信。虽然文献假设失视症和面孔失认症之间存在联系,但失视症的其他损伤已被证明是相当普遍的。因此,我们假设失忆症患者不仅在面部识别方面表现出障碍,而且在一般的视觉识别表现方面也表现出障碍,这可能受到刺激复杂性的影响。为了验证这一假设,65名失忆者与55名对照组进行了面部识别任务(剑桥面部记忆测试)和相应的物体识别任务(剑桥汽车记忆测试)的比较。在这两项任务中,失忆症患者的表现都比对照组差,表明没有面部特异性的轻度识别缺陷。在这两项任务中,还发现了图像生动度与表现之间的额外相关性,这表明视觉图像不仅在图像极端情况下影响视觉识别。刺激复杂性产生了预期的调节效应,但仅对整个图像谱和面部刺激有效。总的来说,研究结果表明,失视症与一种普遍但轻微的视觉识别缺陷有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perception
Perception 医学-心理学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
74
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Perception is a traditional print journal covering all areas of the perceptual sciences, but with a strong historical emphasis on perceptual illusions. Perception is a subscription journal, free for authors to publish their research as a Standard Article, Short Report or Short & Sweet. The journal also publishes Editorials and Book Reviews.
期刊最新文献
Re-examining our evolutionary propensities toward snakes: Insights from children's inattentional blindness. Face to face: Comparing ChatGPT with human performance on face matching. The overestimation of gaze for horizontal, vertical, and diagonal fixation points. Crossmodal to unimodal transfer of temporal perceptual learning. The Ames room and the misunderstood versions and depictions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1