Socio-economic status and the rise of divorce in Sweden: The case of the 1880-1954 marriage cohorts in Västerbotten.

IF 2.5 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY Population Studies-A Journal of Demography Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-05 DOI:10.1080/00324728.2022.2149844
Glenn Sandström, Maria Stanfors
{"title":"Socio-economic status and the rise of divorce in Sweden: The case of the 1880-1954 marriage cohorts in Västerbotten.","authors":"Glenn Sandström,&nbsp;Maria Stanfors","doi":"10.1080/00324728.2022.2149844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An established negative association between socio-economic status (SES) and divorce has applied to most Western nations since 1960. We expected a positive association between SES and divorce for low-divorce contexts historically because only individuals in higher social strata had the resources to overcome barriers to divorce. According to Goode's socio-economic growth theory, this relationship was reversed as industrialization and modernization began removing the economic and normative barriers. Making use of longitudinal data from parish registers, we investigated SES and other micro-level determinants of divorce among men and women in northern Sweden who married between 1880 and 1954. Results indicated a positive association between SES and divorce among those who married 1880-1919, with the middle class, not the elite, featuring the highest divorce risks. This association changed for couples who married in the 1920s, for whom divorce became more common and the working class faced similar divorce risks to the higher social strata.</p>","PeriodicalId":47814,"journal":{"name":"Population Studies-A Journal of Demography","volume":" ","pages":"417-435"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Studies-A Journal of Demography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2022.2149844","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An established negative association between socio-economic status (SES) and divorce has applied to most Western nations since 1960. We expected a positive association between SES and divorce for low-divorce contexts historically because only individuals in higher social strata had the resources to overcome barriers to divorce. According to Goode's socio-economic growth theory, this relationship was reversed as industrialization and modernization began removing the economic and normative barriers. Making use of longitudinal data from parish registers, we investigated SES and other micro-level determinants of divorce among men and women in northern Sweden who married between 1880 and 1954. Results indicated a positive association between SES and divorce among those who married 1880-1919, with the middle class, not the elite, featuring the highest divorce risks. This association changed for couples who married in the 1920s, for whom divorce became more common and the working class faced similar divorce risks to the higher social strata.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞典的社会经济地位和离婚率的上升:以1880-1954年Västerbotten的婚姻群体为例。
自1960年以来,社会经济地位(SES)与离婚之间的一种既定的负相关关系已适用于大多数西方国家。从历史上看,在低离婚率的情况下,我们预计社会经济地位和离婚之间会有积极的联系,因为只有更高社会阶层的个人才有资源克服离婚的障碍。根据古德的社会经济增长理论,随着工业化和现代化开始消除经济和规范障碍,这种关系发生了逆转。利用教区登记的纵向数据,我们调查了瑞典北部1880年至1954年间结婚的男性和女性的社会经济地位和其他微观层面的离婚决定因素。结果表明,在1880-1919年结婚的人中,社会经济地位与离婚呈正相关,中产阶级而非精英阶层的离婚风险最高。这种联系在20世纪20年代结婚的夫妇中发生了变化,对他们来说,离婚变得更加普遍,工人阶级面临着与更高社会阶层相似的离婚风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: For over half a century, Population Studies has reported significant advances in methods of demographic analysis, conceptual and mathematical theories of demographic dynamics and behaviour, and the use of these theories and methods to extend scientific knowledge and to inform policy and practice. The Journal"s coverage of this field is comprehensive: applications in developed and developing countries; historical and contemporary studies; quantitative and qualitative studies; analytical essays and reviews. The subjects of papers range from classical concerns, such as the determinants and consequences of population change, to such topics as family demography and evolutionary and genetic influences on demographic behaviour.
期刊最新文献
Party penalty or party premium? 'Party Swedes' in Norway and their income before, during, and after migration. Estimating adult mortality based on maternal orphanhood in populations with HIV/AIDS. Intergenerational transmission of fertility in Great Britain: A parity-specific investigation using the 1970 British Cohort Study. Estimating age-specific mortality using calibrated splines. Infant and child mortality in the Netherlands 1935-47 and changes related to the Dutch famine of 1944-45: A population-based analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1