Exploring the myths surrounding the COVID-19 vaccines in Africa: the study to investigate their impacts on acceptance using online survey and social media.

Emmanuel Lamptey, Ephraim Kumi Senkyire, Serwaa Dorcas, Dooshima Aki Benita, Evans Osei Boakye, Theckla Ikome, Alex Asamoah
{"title":"Exploring the myths surrounding the COVID-19 vaccines in Africa: the study to investigate their impacts on acceptance using online survey and social media.","authors":"Emmanuel Lamptey,&nbsp;Ephraim Kumi Senkyire,&nbsp;Serwaa Dorcas,&nbsp;Dooshima Aki Benita,&nbsp;Evans Osei Boakye,&nbsp;Theckla Ikome,&nbsp;Alex Asamoah","doi":"10.7774/cevr.2022.11.2.193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine is the key to getting out of the pandemic. However, acceptance of the vaccine has been affected by false information and rumors, which have kept people from getting the shot since it was rolled out.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the various misconceptions surfaced about the COVID-19 vaccines in Africa. We performed an online survey using an anonymous questionnaire to reach out to African respondents by social media and all possible online platforms such as Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, and so forth. The web-based questionnaires about the myths surrounding the vaccines were extracted from nonscientific information, unproven statements, social media posts, news reports, and people's concerns about the safety of the COVID-19 vaccines. Participants indicated their level of agreement with each statement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,500 people responded to the online survey in Africa. The two common myths that respondents agreed with were that \"since vaccines for COVID-19 have been developed, we can make vaccines for the common cold, human immunodeficiency viruses, and other diseases\" (n=892, 35.7%) and that \"researchers rushed the development of the COVID-19 vaccines; therefore, it is not very effective, safe and cannot be trusted\" (n=595, 23.8%). The range of respondents who neither agreed nor disagreed with these myths was 12.4%-33.0%. The majority (1,931, 77.2%) indicated disagreement with the statement \"after getting the COVID-19 vaccine, one can stop wearing a mask as well as taking safety precautions.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Myths surrounding the COVID-19 vaccines have impact on acceptance. Exploring them helps public health authorities in Africa dispel them and provide accurate information to promote vaccination campaigns, education, and acceptance.</p>","PeriodicalId":51768,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research","volume":"11 2","pages":"193-208"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ec/9f/cevr-11-193.PMC9200652.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7774/cevr.2022.11.2.193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine is the key to getting out of the pandemic. However, acceptance of the vaccine has been affected by false information and rumors, which have kept people from getting the shot since it was rolled out.

Materials and methods: This study aimed to investigate the various misconceptions surfaced about the COVID-19 vaccines in Africa. We performed an online survey using an anonymous questionnaire to reach out to African respondents by social media and all possible online platforms such as Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, and so forth. The web-based questionnaires about the myths surrounding the vaccines were extracted from nonscientific information, unproven statements, social media posts, news reports, and people's concerns about the safety of the COVID-19 vaccines. Participants indicated their level of agreement with each statement.

Results: A total of 2,500 people responded to the online survey in Africa. The two common myths that respondents agreed with were that "since vaccines for COVID-19 have been developed, we can make vaccines for the common cold, human immunodeficiency viruses, and other diseases" (n=892, 35.7%) and that "researchers rushed the development of the COVID-19 vaccines; therefore, it is not very effective, safe and cannot be trusted" (n=595, 23.8%). The range of respondents who neither agreed nor disagreed with these myths was 12.4%-33.0%. The majority (1,931, 77.2%) indicated disagreement with the statement "after getting the COVID-19 vaccine, one can stop wearing a mask as well as taking safety precautions."

Conclusion: Myths surrounding the COVID-19 vaccines have impact on acceptance. Exploring them helps public health authorities in Africa dispel them and provide accurate information to promote vaccination campaigns, education, and acceptance.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索非洲COVID-19疫苗的神话:利用在线调查和社交媒体调查其对接受度的影响的研究。
目的:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗是摆脱疫情的关键。然而,自疫苗推出以来,人们对疫苗的接受程度受到虚假信息和谣言的影响,这些信息和谣言使人们无法接种疫苗。材料和方法:本研究旨在调查非洲对COVID-19疫苗的各种误解。我们进行了一项在线调查,使用匿名问卷,通过社交媒体和所有可能的在线平台,如Facebook、WhatsApp、Instagram、Twitter、YouTube等,接触到非洲的受访者。基于网络的关于疫苗神话的调查问卷是从非科学信息、未经证实的陈述、社交媒体帖子、新闻报道以及人们对COVID-19疫苗安全性的担忧中提取的。参与者表明了他们对每个陈述的同意程度。结果:共有2500人对非洲的在线调查做出了回应。受访者认同的两个常见误区是“既然已经开发出了COVID-19疫苗,我们就可以生产普通感冒、人类免疫缺陷病毒和其他疾病的疫苗”(n=892, 35.7%)和“研究人员匆忙开发了COVID-19疫苗;因此,它不是很有效,不安全,不能信任”(n=595, 23.8%)。12.4%-33.0%的受访者既不同意也不反对这些说法。大多数人(1931人,77.2%)不同意“接种新冠病毒疫苗后,可以不戴口罩,也可以采取安全措施”的说法。结论:围绕COVID-19疫苗的误解影响了人们的接受程度。探索这些问题有助于非洲的公共卫生当局消除它们,并提供准确的信息,以促进疫苗接种运动、教育和接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
29
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clin Exp Vaccine Res, the official English journal of the Korean Vaccine Society, is an international, peer reviewed, and open-access journal. It covers all areas related to vaccines and vaccination. Clin Exp Vaccine Res publishes editorials, review articles, special articles, original articles, case reports, brief communications, and correspondences covering a wide range of clinical and experimental subjects including vaccines and vaccination for human and animals against infectious diseases caused by viruses, bacteria, parasites and tumor. The scope of the journal is to disseminate information that may contribute to elaborate vaccine development and vaccination strategies targeting infectious diseases and tumors in human and animals. Relevant topics range from experimental approaches to (pre)clinical trials for the vaccine research based on, but not limited to, basic laboratory, translational, and (pre)clinical investigations, epidemiology of infectious diseases and progression of all aspects in the health related issues. It is published printed and open accessed online issues (https://ecevr.org) two times per year in 31 January and 31 July. Clin Exp Vaccine Res is linked to many international databases and is made freely available to institutions and individuals worldwide
期刊最新文献
Completing the pieces of a puzzle: in-depth probing of Toxoplasma gondii rhoptry protein 4 as a promising target for vaccination using an in-silico approach. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among medical students, health professionals, and health care workers: an umbrella review. Anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike receptor-binding domain antibody levels in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus based on vaccination status and related factors in Indonesia. Effect of SpikoGen subunit vaccine administration during pregnancy on fetal development of rats. Clinical presentation, associated factors, and course of cutaneous reaction after the booster dose of COVID-19 vaccination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1