Art and science of risk stratification of sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Current state, unknowns, and future directions

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Progress in cardiovascular diseases Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pcad.2023.08.005
Konstantinos C. Siontis, Steve R. Ommen, Jeffrey B. Geske
{"title":"Art and science of risk stratification of sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Current state, unknowns, and future directions","authors":"Konstantinos C. Siontis,&nbsp;Steve R. Ommen,&nbsp;Jeffrey B. Geske","doi":"10.1016/j.pcad.2023.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The progress in the management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) over the last several decades has resulted in great improvements in </span>quality of life<span> and overall survival for HCM patients. Yet, sudden cardiac death<span> (SCD) due to ventricular tachyarrhythmias is among the common causes of HCM-related mortality. SCD </span></span></span>risk stratification is a central and often challenging domain in the care of the HCM patient. Distinguishing the individuals most likely to benefit from a primary prevention implantable-cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) from those truly at a low risk of SCD in whom an ICD is not necessary is a nuanced process. Clinicians need to carefully balance the potential benefit and risks of ICDs, particularly in young patients. Because of intense investigations in diverse HCM cohorts globally, two main approaches to SCD risk stratification in HCM have emerged, one based on major SCD risk factors and one based on a mathematically derived risk score. In this overview, we discuss the current state, latest advances and remaining unknowns about established and novel markers of risk of SCD in HCM. We also review how the risk factor- and risk score-based assessments can and should be used in conjunction to enhance rather than contradict each other in facilitating informed ICD decision-making in contemporary clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21156,"journal":{"name":"Progress in cardiovascular diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in cardiovascular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033062023000804","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The progress in the management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) over the last several decades has resulted in great improvements in quality of life and overall survival for HCM patients. Yet, sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to ventricular tachyarrhythmias is among the common causes of HCM-related mortality. SCD risk stratification is a central and often challenging domain in the care of the HCM patient. Distinguishing the individuals most likely to benefit from a primary prevention implantable-cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) from those truly at a low risk of SCD in whom an ICD is not necessary is a nuanced process. Clinicians need to carefully balance the potential benefit and risks of ICDs, particularly in young patients. Because of intense investigations in diverse HCM cohorts globally, two main approaches to SCD risk stratification in HCM have emerged, one based on major SCD risk factors and one based on a mathematically derived risk score. In this overview, we discuss the current state, latest advances and remaining unknowns about established and novel markers of risk of SCD in HCM. We also review how the risk factor- and risk score-based assessments can and should be used in conjunction to enhance rather than contradict each other in facilitating informed ICD decision-making in contemporary clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肥厚型心肌病心源性猝死风险分层的艺术与科学:现状、未知因素和未来方向。
在过去的几十年里,肥厚型心肌病(HCM)的治疗取得了进展,极大地提高了HCM患者的生活质量和总生存率。然而,室性快速性心律失常引起的心源性猝死(SCD)是HCM相关死亡的常见原因之一。SCD风险分层是HCM患者护理中的一个核心且经常具有挑战性的领域。区分最有可能从一级预防植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)中受益的个体和那些真正患有SCD的低风险人群(不需要ICD)是一个微妙的过程。临床医生需要仔细平衡ICD的潜在益处和风险,尤其是年轻患者。由于在全球范围内对不同的HCM队列进行了深入的研究,出现了两种主要的HCM SCD风险分层方法,一种基于主要的SCD风险因素,另一种基于数学推导的风险评分。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了HCM SCD风险标志物的现状、最新进展和剩余的未知因素。我们还回顾了在当代临床实践中,基于风险因素和风险评分的评估如何能够并且应该结合使用,以增强而不是相互矛盾,从而促进知情的ICD决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in cardiovascular diseases
Progress in cardiovascular diseases 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.60%
发文量
98
审稿时长
7 days
期刊介绍: Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases provides comprehensive coverage of a single topic related to heart and circulatory disorders in each issue. Some issues include special articles, definitive reviews that capture the state of the art in the management of particular clinical problems in cardiology.
期刊最新文献
Table of contents Editorial Board The link between impaired oxygen supply and cognitive decline in peripheral artery disease Long-term continuous exercise training counteracts the negative impact of the menopause transition on cardiometabolic health in hypertensive women - a 9-year RCT follow-up The weekly mortality for ischemic heart disease in the US still peaks on mondays
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1