Tuning to non-veridical features in attention and perceptual decision-making: An EEG study

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Neuropsychologia Pub Date : 2023-09-09 DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108634
Stefanie I. Becker, Zachary Hamblin-Frohman, Hongfeng Xia, Zeguo Qiu
{"title":"Tuning to non-veridical features in attention and perceptual decision-making: An EEG study","authors":"Stefanie I. Becker,&nbsp;Zachary Hamblin-Frohman,&nbsp;Hongfeng Xia,&nbsp;Zeguo Qiu","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>When searching for a lost item, we tune attention to the known properties of the object. Previously, it was believed that attention is tuned to the veridical attributes of the search target (e.g., orange), or an attribute that is slightly shifted away from irrelevant features towards a value that can more optimally distinguish the target from the distractors (e.g., red-orange; optimal tuning). However, recent studies showed that attention is often tuned to the relative feature of the search target (e.g., redder), so that all items that match the relative features of the target equally attract attention (e.g., all redder items; relational account). Optimal tuning was shown to occur only at a later stage of identifying the target. However, the evidence for this division mainly relied on eye tracking studies that assessed the first eye movements. The present study tested whether this division can also be observed when the task is completed with covert attention and without moving the eyes. We used the N2pc in the EEG of participants to assess covert attention, and found comparable results: Attention was initially tuned to the relative colour of the target, as shown by a significantly larger N2pc to relatively matching distractors than a target-coloured distractor. However, in the response accuracies, a slightly shifted, “optimal” distractor interfered most strongly with target identification. These results confirm that early (covert) attention is tuned to the relative properties of an item, in line with the relational account, while later decision-making processes may be biased to optimal features.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19279,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychologia","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 108634"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychologia","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393223001689","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When searching for a lost item, we tune attention to the known properties of the object. Previously, it was believed that attention is tuned to the veridical attributes of the search target (e.g., orange), or an attribute that is slightly shifted away from irrelevant features towards a value that can more optimally distinguish the target from the distractors (e.g., red-orange; optimal tuning). However, recent studies showed that attention is often tuned to the relative feature of the search target (e.g., redder), so that all items that match the relative features of the target equally attract attention (e.g., all redder items; relational account). Optimal tuning was shown to occur only at a later stage of identifying the target. However, the evidence for this division mainly relied on eye tracking studies that assessed the first eye movements. The present study tested whether this division can also be observed when the task is completed with covert attention and without moving the eyes. We used the N2pc in the EEG of participants to assess covert attention, and found comparable results: Attention was initially tuned to the relative colour of the target, as shown by a significantly larger N2pc to relatively matching distractors than a target-coloured distractor. However, in the response accuracies, a slightly shifted, “optimal” distractor interfered most strongly with target identification. These results confirm that early (covert) attention is tuned to the relative properties of an item, in line with the relational account, while later decision-making processes may be biased to optimal features.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对注意力和感知决策中非真实特征的调节:一项脑电图研究
当搜索丢失的物品时,我们会将注意力集中在物品的已知属性上。以前,人们认为注意力被调整到搜索目标的真实属性(例如,橙色),或者从不相关的特征稍微转移到可以更优化地将目标与干扰物区分开来的值的属性上(例如,红橙色;最佳调整)。然而,最近的研究表明,注意力通常被调整到搜索目标的相对特征上(例如,更红),因此与目标的相对特性匹配的所有项目都同样吸引注意力(例如,所有更红的项目;关系账户)。最佳调整被证明只发生在识别目标的后期阶段。然而,这一划分的证据主要依赖于评估第一眼运动的眼动追踪研究。本研究测试了当任务完成时,在不移动眼睛的情况下,是否也可以观察到这种划分。我们使用参与者脑电图中的N2pc来评估隐蔽注意力,并发现了可比较的结果:注意力最初被调整到目标的相对颜色,如与目标颜色的干扰物相比,相对匹配的干扰器的N2pc明显更大。然而,在反应准确性方面,稍微偏移的“最佳”干扰物对目标识别的干扰最强。这些结果证实,早期(隐蔽)注意力被调整到项目的相对属性,与关系账户一致,而后期的决策过程可能会偏向于最佳特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychologia
Neuropsychologia 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
228
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neuropsychologia is an international interdisciplinary journal devoted to experimental and theoretical contributions that advance understanding of human cognition and behavior from a neuroscience perspective. The journal will consider for publication studies that link brain function with cognitive processes, including attention and awareness, action and motor control, executive functions and cognitive control, memory, language, and emotion and social cognition.
期刊最新文献
Primary manipulation knowledge of objects is associated with the functional coupling of pMTG and aIPS Temporal dynamics of implicit moral evaluation: From empathy for pain to mentalizing processes Neuroimaging and perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: A narrative review of research and future directions Working memory load increases movement-related alpha and beta desynchronization Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1