Survey of barriers and opportunities for prescribing buprenorphine for opioid use disorder in Alabama.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Journal of Addictive Diseases Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-31 DOI:10.1080/10550887.2023.2247950
Ishika Patel, Li Li, Haelim Jeong, Justin T McDaniel, Shanna McIntosh, Ellen Robertson, David L Albright
{"title":"Survey of barriers and opportunities for prescribing buprenorphine for opioid use disorder in Alabama.","authors":"Ishika Patel, Li Li, Haelim Jeong, Justin T McDaniel, Shanna McIntosh, Ellen Robertson, David L Albright","doi":"10.1080/10550887.2023.2247950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Opioid-related overdose deaths have significantly increased in the USA and in Alabama. Despite this, medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) remains significantly underutilized. Thus, this study aims to gain a better understanding of clinicians' viewpoints on potential barriers and opportunities that are likely to impact and improve the access to MOUD, especially buprenorphine prescribing. A cross-sectional survey study was conducted with Alabama's clinicians (<i>n</i> = 492). The survey containing a QR code was mailed to clinicians throughout the state and was asked about their viewpoints and thoughts on prescribing buprenorphine. Multivariable linear regression was used to examine associations between OUD self-efficacy, beliefs about the effectiveness of MOUD, attitudes regarding whether or not MOUD is addictive, and positive affect surrounding the treatment of OUD patients. A minority of respondents (39.8%) reported that they have an active X-waiver for MOUD. Results showed that beliefs that MOUD is addictive were significantly inversely correlated with beliefs about MOUD being effective. Furthermore, both self-efficacy and positive affect were significantly and positively associated with beliefs that MOUD is effective. Furthermore, nurse practitioners were more likely than physicians to have higher scores on the \"MAT is Addictive\" construct. Self-efficacy with OUD patients was positively associated with the \"MOUD is Effective\" construct. Finally, results showed that X-waivered providers expressed greater positive affect toward OUD patients than providers who were not X-waivered (<i>b</i> = 2.9, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Belief that MOUD is effective was also positively associated with higher scores on the positive affect construct (<i>b</i> = 0.5, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Several barriers and opportunities were identified in our survey data which could be used to explore MOUD expansion, especially buprenorphine prescribing. Strategic plans in expanding MOUD access may include educational trainings on MOUD, motivating clinicians to utilize their capacity by implementing incentive plans, increasing provider self-efficacy, reducing stigma around MOUD, and providing more financial support to uninsured patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":47493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"410-417"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2023.2247950","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Opioid-related overdose deaths have significantly increased in the USA and in Alabama. Despite this, medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) remains significantly underutilized. Thus, this study aims to gain a better understanding of clinicians' viewpoints on potential barriers and opportunities that are likely to impact and improve the access to MOUD, especially buprenorphine prescribing. A cross-sectional survey study was conducted with Alabama's clinicians (n = 492). The survey containing a QR code was mailed to clinicians throughout the state and was asked about their viewpoints and thoughts on prescribing buprenorphine. Multivariable linear regression was used to examine associations between OUD self-efficacy, beliefs about the effectiveness of MOUD, attitudes regarding whether or not MOUD is addictive, and positive affect surrounding the treatment of OUD patients. A minority of respondents (39.8%) reported that they have an active X-waiver for MOUD. Results showed that beliefs that MOUD is addictive were significantly inversely correlated with beliefs about MOUD being effective. Furthermore, both self-efficacy and positive affect were significantly and positively associated with beliefs that MOUD is effective. Furthermore, nurse practitioners were more likely than physicians to have higher scores on the "MAT is Addictive" construct. Self-efficacy with OUD patients was positively associated with the "MOUD is Effective" construct. Finally, results showed that X-waivered providers expressed greater positive affect toward OUD patients than providers who were not X-waivered (b = 2.9, p < 0.001). Belief that MOUD is effective was also positively associated with higher scores on the positive affect construct (b = 0.5, p < 0.001). Several barriers and opportunities were identified in our survey data which could be used to explore MOUD expansion, especially buprenorphine prescribing. Strategic plans in expanding MOUD access may include educational trainings on MOUD, motivating clinicians to utilize their capacity by implementing incentive plans, increasing provider self-efficacy, reducing stigma around MOUD, and providing more financial support to uninsured patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿拉巴马州开丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的障碍和机遇调查。
在美国和阿拉巴马州,与阿片类药物过量相关的死亡人数大幅增加。尽管如此,治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)的药物仍然严重利用不足。因此,本研究旨在更好地了解临床医生对可能影响和改善阿片类药物使用障碍(尤其是丁丙诺啡处方)的潜在障碍和机遇的看法。我们对阿拉巴马州的临床医生(n = 492)进行了一项横向调查研究。调查问卷包含一个二维码,邮寄给全州的临床医生,询问他们对开丁丙诺啡处方的观点和想法。调查采用多变量线性回归的方法来研究 OUD 自我效能、对 MOUD 有效性的看法、对 MOUD 是否会成瘾的态度以及对治疗 OUD 患者的积极态度之间的关联。少数受访者(39.8%)表示,他们拥有有效的 MOUD X 豁免权。结果显示,认为 MOUD 会上瘾的信念与认为 MOUD 有效的信念明显成反比。此外,自我效能感和积极情绪与 "MOUD有效 "的信念呈显著正相关。此外,执业护士比医生更有可能在 "MAT 会上瘾 "这一建构上获得更高的分数。对 OUD 患者的自我效能感与 "MOUD 是有效的 "构念呈正相关。最后,结果显示,与未接受 X-waiver 的医疗服务提供者相比,接受过 X-waiver 的医疗服务提供者对 OUD 患者表达了更多的积极情感(b = 2.9,p b = 0.5,p b = 0.5)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of Addictive Diseases is an essential, comprehensive resource covering the full range of addictions for today"s addiction professional. This in-depth, practical journal helps you stay on top of the vital issues and the clinical skills necessary to ensure effective practice. The latest research, treatments, and public policy issues in addiction medicine are presented in a fully integrated, multi-specialty perspective. Top researchers and respected leaders in addiction issues share their knowledge and insights to keep you up-to-date on the most important research and practical applications.
期刊最新文献
"Smoker" and "Vaper" identity in people who use both cigarettes and E-cigarettes: Changes over time and associations with smoking behaviors. Cannabis flower, concentrates, and edibles: a narrative review comparing prevalence of use, methods of consumption, and cannabis use disorder outcomes. A mixed-method exploration of #vapingcessation videos on TikTok. Buprenorphine prescription and treatment initiation through preemptive outreach and telehealth consultation with emergency medicine providers. Co-occurring pain and addiction: prognostic implications for healthcare professionals in residential treatment for substance use disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1