Interventions Risk Evaluation and Management in Aseptic Manufacturing.

Hal Baseman, Subrata Chakraborty, Michael A Long
{"title":"Interventions Risk Evaluation and Management in Aseptic Manufacturing.","authors":"Hal Baseman,&nbsp;Subrata Chakraborty,&nbsp;Michael A Long","doi":"10.5731/pdajpst.2020.012245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interventions performed by personnel during an aseptic process can be a key source of microbiological contamination of sterile biopharmaceutical products, irrespective of the type of manufacturing system used. Understanding the relative risk of this source of contamination provides valuable information to help make decisions for the design, qualification, validation, operation, monitoring, and evaluation of the aseptic process. These decisions can be used to improve the aseptic process and provide assurance of the sterility of the products. To achieve these goals, an assessment of the contamination risk is needed. This risk assessment should be objective, accurate, and useful. This article presents an Intervention Risk Evaluation Model (IREM) philosophy and an objective, accurate, and useful method for intervention risk determination. The IREM uses a key word approach to identify, obtain, measure, and evaluate intervention risk factors. This article presents a general discussion of the method with the help of a case study to illustrate the development of the model, whereas subsequent parts would focus on application of this model with practical examples. This not only attempts to create objectivity of the entire process, but it develops awareness of the associated risks among shop floor operators, which can lead to a reduction of the overall risk level of the process and an improvement in the sterility assurance level.</p>","PeriodicalId":19986,"journal":{"name":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2020.012245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interventions performed by personnel during an aseptic process can be a key source of microbiological contamination of sterile biopharmaceutical products, irrespective of the type of manufacturing system used. Understanding the relative risk of this source of contamination provides valuable information to help make decisions for the design, qualification, validation, operation, monitoring, and evaluation of the aseptic process. These decisions can be used to improve the aseptic process and provide assurance of the sterility of the products. To achieve these goals, an assessment of the contamination risk is needed. This risk assessment should be objective, accurate, and useful. This article presents an Intervention Risk Evaluation Model (IREM) philosophy and an objective, accurate, and useful method for intervention risk determination. The IREM uses a key word approach to identify, obtain, measure, and evaluate intervention risk factors. This article presents a general discussion of the method with the help of a case study to illustrate the development of the model, whereas subsequent parts would focus on application of this model with practical examples. This not only attempts to create objectivity of the entire process, but it develops awareness of the associated risks among shop floor operators, which can lead to a reduction of the overall risk level of the process and an improvement in the sterility assurance level.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无菌生产干预风险评价与管理。
人员在无菌过程中进行的干预可能是无菌生物制药产品微生物污染的主要来源,与使用的制造系统类型无关。了解该污染源的相对风险可提供有价值的信息,有助于对无菌工艺的设计、确认、验证、操作、监控和评价做出决策。这些决定可用于改进无菌工艺并保证产品的无菌性。为了实现这些目标,需要对污染风险进行评估。这种风险评估应该是客观、准确和有用的。本文提出了干预风险评估模型(IREM)的理念,并提出了一种客观、准确、实用的干预风险确定方法。IREM使用关键字方法来识别、获取、测量和评估干预风险因素。本文通过案例研究对该方法进行了一般性讨论,以说明模型的发展,而后续部分将通过实际示例重点介绍该模型的应用。这不仅试图建立整个过程的客观性,而且还培养了车间操作员对相关风险的认识,这可以降低过程的整体风险水平,并提高无菌保证水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Sensitization Assessment of Extractables and Leachables in Pharmaceuticals: ELSIE Database Analysis. Best Practices for Microbial Challenge In-Use Studies to Evaluate the Microbial Growth Potential of Parenteral Biological Products; Industry and Regulatory Considerations. Worldwide Regulatory Reliance: Launching a Pilot on a Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Control Post Approval Change for a Vaccine. Nonlinear Tissue Permeability Drives Tissue Pressure and Injection Distribution: A Computational Investigation of Subcutaneous Injections. Prefilled Ophthalmic syringes - New Possibilities in Terminal Sterilization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1