A primer on synthesizing individual participant data obtained from complex sampling surveys: A two-stage IPD meta-analysis approach.

IF 7.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychological methods Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-09 DOI:10.1037/met0000539
Diego G Campos, Mike W-L Cheung, Ronny Scherer
{"title":"A primer on synthesizing individual participant data obtained from complex sampling surveys: A two-stage IPD meta-analysis approach.","authors":"Diego G Campos, Mike W-L Cheung, Ronny Scherer","doi":"10.1037/met0000539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The increasing availability of individual participant data (IPD) in the social sciences offers new possibilities to synthesize research evidence across primary studies. Two-stage IPD meta-analysis represents a framework that can utilize these possibilities. While most of the methodological research on two-stage IPD meta-analysis focused on its performance compared with other approaches, dealing with the complexities of the primary and meta-analytic data has received little attention, particularly when IPD are drawn from complex sampling surveys. Complex sampling surveys often feature clustering, stratification, and multistage sampling to obtain nationally or internationally representative data from a target population. Furthermore, IPD from these studies is likely to provide more than one effect size. To address these complexities, we propose a two-stage meta-analytic approach that generates model-based effect sizes in Stage 1 and synthesizes them in Stage 2. We present a sequence of steps, illustrate their implementation, and discuss the methodological decisions and options within. Given its flexibility to deal with the complex nature of the primary and meta-analytic data and its ability to combine multiple IPD sets or IPD with aggregated data, the proposed two-stage approach opens up new analytic possibilities for synthesizing knowledge from complex sampling surveys. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20782,"journal":{"name":"Psychological methods","volume":" ","pages":"83-111"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000539","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing availability of individual participant data (IPD) in the social sciences offers new possibilities to synthesize research evidence across primary studies. Two-stage IPD meta-analysis represents a framework that can utilize these possibilities. While most of the methodological research on two-stage IPD meta-analysis focused on its performance compared with other approaches, dealing with the complexities of the primary and meta-analytic data has received little attention, particularly when IPD are drawn from complex sampling surveys. Complex sampling surveys often feature clustering, stratification, and multistage sampling to obtain nationally or internationally representative data from a target population. Furthermore, IPD from these studies is likely to provide more than one effect size. To address these complexities, we propose a two-stage meta-analytic approach that generates model-based effect sizes in Stage 1 and synthesizes them in Stage 2. We present a sequence of steps, illustrate their implementation, and discuss the methodological decisions and options within. Given its flexibility to deal with the complex nature of the primary and meta-analytic data and its ability to combine multiple IPD sets or IPD with aggregated data, the proposed two-stage approach opens up new analytic possibilities for synthesizing knowledge from complex sampling surveys. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
综合从复杂抽样调查中获得的个体参与者数据的入门指南:两阶段 IPD 元分析方法。
在社会科学领域,越来越多的个体参与者数据(IPD)为综合各主要研究的研究证据提供了新的可能性。两阶段 IPD 荟萃分析是一种可以利用这些可能性的框架。关于两阶段 IPD 元分析的方法论研究大多集中在其与其他方法相比的性能上,而处理原始数据和元分析数据的复杂性却很少受到关注,尤其是当 IPD 来自复杂的抽样调查时。复杂抽样调查通常以聚类、分层和多阶段抽样为特征,从目标人群中获取具有全国或国际代表性的数据。此外,来自这些研究的 IPD 很可能提供不止一个效应大小。为了解决这些复杂问题,我们提出了一种两阶段元分析方法,即在第一阶段生成基于模型的效应大小,并在第二阶段对其进行综合。我们提出了一系列步骤,说明了这些步骤的实施,并讨论了其中的方法决策和选择。鉴于该方法能灵活处理原始数据和元分析数据的复杂性,并能将多个 IPD 集或 IPD 与汇总数据结合起来,因此建议的两阶段方法为综合复杂抽样调查的知识开辟了新的分析可能性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological methods
Psychological methods PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: Psychological Methods is devoted to the development and dissemination of methods for collecting, analyzing, understanding, and interpreting psychological data. Its purpose is the dissemination of innovations in research design, measurement, methodology, and quantitative and qualitative analysis to the psychological community; its further purpose is to promote effective communication about related substantive and methodological issues. The audience is expected to be diverse and to include those who develop new procedures, those who are responsible for undergraduate and graduate training in design, measurement, and statistics, as well as those who employ those procedures in research.
期刊最新文献
Troubleshooting Bayesian cognitive models. A novel approach to estimate moderated treatment effects and moderated mediated effects with continuous moderators. Is exploratory factor analysis always to be preferred? A systematic comparison of factor analytic techniques throughout the confirmatory-exploratory continuum. Everything has its price: Foundations of cost-sensitive machine learning and its application in psychology. A primer on synthesizing individual participant data obtained from complex sampling surveys: A two-stage IPD meta-analysis approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1