Comparing Informants for Mental Health Screening at the Preschool Level.

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q1 Social Sciences School Psychology Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1080/2372966x.2020.1841546
Stephanie A Moore, Erin Dowdy, Isabelle Fleury, Christine DiStefano, Fred W Greer
{"title":"Comparing Informants for Mental Health Screening at the Preschool Level.","authors":"Stephanie A Moore,&nbsp;Erin Dowdy,&nbsp;Isabelle Fleury,&nbsp;Christine DiStefano,&nbsp;Fred W Greer","doi":"10.1080/2372966x.2020.1841546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Universal screening for mental health in preschools provides the opportunity for early identification and early intervention, but guidance regarding which informants to use is needed. Preschoolers' (<i>N</i> = 535) parent and teacher reports across two screening forms were analyzed to determine similarities and discrepancies for classification results and screener scores. The analyses also examined if an additional rater provided incrementally valid information to the prediction of longitudinal kindergarten outcomes. Parents' and teachers' screening scores were significantly correlated across forms by rater and across raters. However, categorical classification results indicated that teachers were more likely than parents to rate preschoolers in at-risk ranges across forms. Finally, hierarchical regression analyses revealed teacher ratings were predictive of kindergarten social-emotional, cognitive, and academic outcomes, and that the addition of parent ratings did not significantly improve prediction of outcomes. Implications are discussed in the context of multiple raters within multiple-gating screening procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":21555,"journal":{"name":"School Psychology Review","volume":"51 5","pages":"589-608"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/2372966x.2020.1841546","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966x.2020.1841546","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Universal screening for mental health in preschools provides the opportunity for early identification and early intervention, but guidance regarding which informants to use is needed. Preschoolers' (N = 535) parent and teacher reports across two screening forms were analyzed to determine similarities and discrepancies for classification results and screener scores. The analyses also examined if an additional rater provided incrementally valid information to the prediction of longitudinal kindergarten outcomes. Parents' and teachers' screening scores were significantly correlated across forms by rater and across raters. However, categorical classification results indicated that teachers were more likely than parents to rate preschoolers in at-risk ranges across forms. Finally, hierarchical regression analyses revealed teacher ratings were predictive of kindergarten social-emotional, cognitive, and academic outcomes, and that the addition of parent ratings did not significantly improve prediction of outcomes. Implications are discussed in the context of multiple raters within multiple-gating screening procedures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学龄前儿童心理健康筛查的被调查者比较。
学龄前儿童普遍进行心理健康筛查为早期识别和早期干预提供了机会,但需要指导使用哪些信息提供者。分析了两种筛选形式的学龄前儿童(N = 535)家长和教师报告,以确定分类结果和筛选分数的相似性和差异。分析还检查了额外的评分是否为纵向幼儿园结果的预测提供了增量有效信息。家长和教师的筛选得分在各量表中呈显著相关。然而,分类结果表明,教师比家长更有可能在各种形式的风险范围内对学龄前儿童进行评级。最后,层次回归分析显示,教师评分可以预测幼儿园的社会情感、认知和学业成绩,而父母评分的增加并没有显著提高预测结果。在多门筛选程序中的多重评分者的背景下讨论影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
School Psychology Review
School Psychology Review Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: School Psychology Review (SPR) is a refereed journal published quarterly by NASP. Its primary purpose is to provide a means for communicating scholarly advances in research, training, and practice related to psychology and education, and specifically to school psychology. Of particular interest are articles presenting original, data-based research that can contribute to the development of innovative intervention and prevention strategies and the evaluation of these approaches. SPR presents important conceptual developments and empirical findings from a wide range of disciplines (e.g., educational, child clinical, pediatric, community.
期刊最新文献
A Model of Performative Racial Ally Behavior: Implications for School Psychology Development of an Interdisciplinary Support Program for Early Career Women of Color in School-Based Mental Health Fields Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms in Middle School Students at-Risk for Aggressive Behavior: Examining the Role of Pandemic Exposure and Perceived Discrimination The Relationship between Intercoder Reliability of Data Extraction and Effect Measure Calculation in Single-Case Meta-Analysis Meta-Analytic Associations Between the Student-Teacher Relationship Scale and Students’ Social Competence With Peers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1