Towards an objective historical tropical cyclone dataset for the Australian region

IF 2.4 4区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Tropical Cyclone Research and Review Pub Date : 2020-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tcrr.2020.03.003
Joseph B. Courtney , Andrew D. Burton , Christopher S. Velden , Timothy L. Olander , Elizabeth A. Ritchie , Clair Stark , Leon Majewski
{"title":"Towards an objective historical tropical cyclone dataset for the Australian region","authors":"Joseph B. Courtney ,&nbsp;Andrew D. Burton ,&nbsp;Christopher S. Velden ,&nbsp;Timothy L. Olander ,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Ritchie ,&nbsp;Clair Stark ,&nbsp;Leon Majewski","doi":"10.1016/j.tcrr.2020.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The appropriate design of infrastructure in tropical cyclone (TC) prone regions requires an understanding of the hazard risk profile underpinned by an accurate, homogenous long-term TC dataset. The existing Australian region TC archive, or ‘best track’ (BT), suffers from inhomogeneities and an incomplete long-term record of key TC parameters. This study assesses mostly satellite-based objective techniques for 1981–2016, the period of a geostationary satellite imagery dataset corrected for navigation and calibration issues. The satellite-based estimates of Australian-region TCs suffer from a general degradation in the 1981–1988 period owing to lower quality and availability of satellite imagery.</p><p>The quality of the objective techniques for both intensity and structure is compared to the reference BT 2003–2016 estimates. For intensity the Advanced Dvorak Technique algorithm corresponds well with the BT 2003–2016, when the algorithm can use passive microwave data (PMW) as an input. For the period prior to 2003 when PMW data is unavailable, the intensity algorithm has a low bias. Systematic corrections were made to the non-PMW objective estimates to produce an extended (1989–2016) homogeneous dataset of maximum wind that has sufficient accuracy to be considered for use where a larger homogeneous sample size is valued over a shorter more accurate period of record. An associated record of central pressure using the Courtney-Knaff-Zehr wind pressure relationship was created.</p><p>For size estimates, three techniques were investigated: the Deviation Angle Variance and the ‘Knaff’ techniques (IR-based), while the ‘Lok’ technique used model information (ECMWF reanalysis dataset and TC vortex specification from ACCESS-TC). However, results lacked sufficient skill to enable extension of the reliable period of record. The availability of scatterometer data makes the BT 2003–2016 dataset the most reliable and accurate. Recommendations regarding the best data source for each parameter for different periods of the record are summarised.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44442,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Cyclone Research and Review","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 23-36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tcrr.2020.03.003","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Cyclone Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2225603220300138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The appropriate design of infrastructure in tropical cyclone (TC) prone regions requires an understanding of the hazard risk profile underpinned by an accurate, homogenous long-term TC dataset. The existing Australian region TC archive, or ‘best track’ (BT), suffers from inhomogeneities and an incomplete long-term record of key TC parameters. This study assesses mostly satellite-based objective techniques for 1981–2016, the period of a geostationary satellite imagery dataset corrected for navigation and calibration issues. The satellite-based estimates of Australian-region TCs suffer from a general degradation in the 1981–1988 period owing to lower quality and availability of satellite imagery.

The quality of the objective techniques for both intensity and structure is compared to the reference BT 2003–2016 estimates. For intensity the Advanced Dvorak Technique algorithm corresponds well with the BT 2003–2016, when the algorithm can use passive microwave data (PMW) as an input. For the period prior to 2003 when PMW data is unavailable, the intensity algorithm has a low bias. Systematic corrections were made to the non-PMW objective estimates to produce an extended (1989–2016) homogeneous dataset of maximum wind that has sufficient accuracy to be considered for use where a larger homogeneous sample size is valued over a shorter more accurate period of record. An associated record of central pressure using the Courtney-Knaff-Zehr wind pressure relationship was created.

For size estimates, three techniques were investigated: the Deviation Angle Variance and the ‘Knaff’ techniques (IR-based), while the ‘Lok’ technique used model information (ECMWF reanalysis dataset and TC vortex specification from ACCESS-TC). However, results lacked sufficient skill to enable extension of the reliable period of record. The availability of scatterometer data makes the BT 2003–2016 dataset the most reliable and accurate. Recommendations regarding the best data source for each parameter for different periods of the record are summarised.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立澳大利亚地区热带气旋客观历史数据集
在热带气旋易发地区,基础设施的适当设计需要对灾害风险概况的理解,并以准确的、同质的长期热带气旋数据集为基础。现有的澳大利亚地区TC档案,或“最佳轨道”(BT),存在不均匀性和关键TC参数的不完整长期记录。本研究主要评估了1981-2016年的基于卫星的客观技术,这是对地球静止卫星图像数据集进行导航和校准校正的时期。1981-1988年期间,由于卫星图像的质量和可用性下降,澳大利亚区域技术转移的卫星估计普遍下降。强度和结构的客观技术质量与参考BT 2003-2016估计进行了比较。对于强度,先进的Dvorak技术算法与BT 2003-2016相吻合,该算法可以使用被动微波数据(PMW)作为输入。对于2003年以前没有PMW数据的时段,强度算法的偏差较小。对非pmw客观估计进行了系统修正,以产生一个扩展的(1989-2016)最大风均匀数据集,该数据集具有足够的精度,可用于在更短更准确的记录期间内评估更大的均匀样本量。使用Courtney-Knaff-Zehr风压关系创建了中心压力的相关记录。对于大小估计,研究了三种技术:偏差角方差和“Knaff”技术(基于ir),而“Lok”技术使用模型信息(ECMWF再分析数据集和ACCESS-TC的TC涡规范)。然而,结果缺乏足够的技巧来延长可靠的记录期。散射计数据的可用性使得BT 2003-2016数据集是最可靠和最准确的。总结了关于记录不同时期的每个参数的最佳数据源的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tropical Cyclone Research and Review
Tropical Cyclone Research and Review METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
184
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Tropical Cyclone Research and Review is an international journal focusing on tropical cyclone monitoring, forecasting, and research as well as associated hydrological effects and disaster risk reduction. This journal is edited and published by the ESCAP/WMO Typhoon Committee (TC) and the Shanghai Typhoon Institute of the China Meteorology Administration (STI/CMA). Contributions from all tropical cyclone basins are welcome. Scope of the journal includes: • Reviews of tropical cyclones exhibiting unusual characteristics or behavior or resulting in disastrous impacts on Typhoon Committee Members and other regional WMO bodies • Advances in applied and basic tropical cyclone research or technology to improve tropical cyclone forecasts and warnings • Basic theoretical studies of tropical cyclones • Event reports, compelling images, and topic review reports of tropical cyclones • Impacts, risk assessments, and risk management techniques related to tropical cyclones
期刊最新文献
Discussion on the enhancement of Typhoon Committee activities for UN EW4All initiative Analyzing coherent structures in the tropical cyclone boundary layer using large eddy simulations Analysis of characteristics and evaluation of forecast accuracy for Super Typhoon Doksuri (2023) Case study of high waves in the South Pacific generated by Tropical Cyclone Harold in 2020 A theoretical method to characterize the resistance effects of nonflat terrain on wind fields in a parametric wind field model for tropical cyclones
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1