The influence of sex on the relations among spatial ability, math anxiety and math performance

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Trends in Neuroscience and Education Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tine.2022.100196
Yehudit Danan, Sarit Ashkenazi
{"title":"The influence of sex on the relations among spatial ability, math anxiety and math performance","authors":"Yehudit Danan,&nbsp;Sarit Ashkenazi","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2022.100196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>A large body of research has found stronger math anxiety in females and suggests that inferior spatial abilities (or attributes towards spatial abilities) in females compared to males are the origin of </span>sex differences in math anxiety.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To fully explore the complex relationship among math anxiety, spatial abilities, math performance and sex differences, the current study examined spatial skills, working memory skills, math anxiety, and self-efficacy as predictors of math performance.</p></div><div><h3>Basic procedures</h3><p>Participating in the study were 89 undergraduate Israeli students (44 males and 45 females).</p></div><div><h3>Main findings</h3><p>The result showed sex differences in a few domains: math anxiety was higher in females compared to males, males outperformed females in number line performance and spatial skills. The relationships among spatial abilities, math performance, and math anxiety were stronger in males than in females. By contrast, the relationship between math self-efficacy and performance was stronger in females compared to males.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This finding demonstrated fundamental differences between the sexes, even with similar performances in curriculum-based assessments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 100196"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949322000242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

A large body of research has found stronger math anxiety in females and suggests that inferior spatial abilities (or attributes towards spatial abilities) in females compared to males are the origin of sex differences in math anxiety.

Purpose

To fully explore the complex relationship among math anxiety, spatial abilities, math performance and sex differences, the current study examined spatial skills, working memory skills, math anxiety, and self-efficacy as predictors of math performance.

Basic procedures

Participating in the study were 89 undergraduate Israeli students (44 males and 45 females).

Main findings

The result showed sex differences in a few domains: math anxiety was higher in females compared to males, males outperformed females in number line performance and spatial skills. The relationships among spatial abilities, math performance, and math anxiety were stronger in males than in females. By contrast, the relationship between math self-efficacy and performance was stronger in females compared to males.

Conclusions

This finding demonstrated fundamental differences between the sexes, even with similar performances in curriculum-based assessments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性别对空间能力、数学焦虑与数学成绩关系的影响
大量研究发现女性的数学焦虑更强,并表明女性的空间能力(或空间能力属性)比男性差,这是数学焦虑的性别差异的根源。目的探讨数学焦虑、空间能力、数学成绩和性别差异之间的复杂关系,研究空间能力、工作记忆能力、数学焦虑和自我效能感对数学成绩的影响。89名以色列大学生(男44名,女45名)参与了这项研究。研究结果显示,在几个领域存在性别差异:女性的数学焦虑程度高于男性,男性在数轴表现和空间技能方面表现优于女性。空间能力、数学成绩和数学焦虑之间的关系在男性中强于女性。相比之下,女性的数学自我效能感和成绩之间的关系比男性更强。这一发现显示了两性之间的根本差异,即使在基于课程的评估中表现相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
65 days
期刊最新文献
Dimensional versus categorical approach: A comparative study of mathematical cognition Translating neuroscience research to practice through grassroots professional learning communities Combining cognitive and affective factors related to mathematical achievement in 4th graders: A psychological network analysis study Neurobiological stress markers in educational research: A systematic review of physiological insights in health science education Applying the science of learning to teacher professional development and back again: Lessons from 3 country contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1