White Paper: Open Digital Health - accelerating transparent and scalable health promotion and treatment.

IF 6.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Health Psychology Review Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1080/17437199.2022.2046482
Dominika Kwasnicka, Jan Keller, Olga Perski, Sebastian Potthoff, Gill A Ten Hoor, Ben Ainsworth, Rik Crutzen, Simone Dohle, Anne van Dongen, Matti Heino, Julia F Henrich, Liam Knox, Laura M König, Wendy Maltinsky, Claire McCallum, Judith Nalukwago, Efrat Neter, Johanna Nurmi, Manuel Spitschan, Samantha B Van Beurden, L Nynke Van der Laan, Kathrin Wunsch, Jasper J J Levink, Robbert Sanderman
{"title":"White Paper: Open Digital Health - accelerating transparent and scalable health promotion and treatment.","authors":"Dominika Kwasnicka,&nbsp;Jan Keller,&nbsp;Olga Perski,&nbsp;Sebastian Potthoff,&nbsp;Gill A Ten Hoor,&nbsp;Ben Ainsworth,&nbsp;Rik Crutzen,&nbsp;Simone Dohle,&nbsp;Anne van Dongen,&nbsp;Matti Heino,&nbsp;Julia F Henrich,&nbsp;Liam Knox,&nbsp;Laura M König,&nbsp;Wendy Maltinsky,&nbsp;Claire McCallum,&nbsp;Judith Nalukwago,&nbsp;Efrat Neter,&nbsp;Johanna Nurmi,&nbsp;Manuel Spitschan,&nbsp;Samantha B Van Beurden,&nbsp;L Nynke Van der Laan,&nbsp;Kathrin Wunsch,&nbsp;Jasper J J Levink,&nbsp;Robbert Sanderman","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2022.2046482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this White Paper, we outline recommendations from the perspective of health psychology and behavioural science, addressing three research gaps: (1) What methods in the health psychology research toolkit can be best used for developing and evaluating digital health tools? (2) What are the most feasible strategies to reuse digital health tools across populations and settings? (3) What are the main advantages and challenges of sharing (openly publishing) data, code, intervention content and design features of digital health tools? We provide actionable suggestions for researchers joining the continuously growing Open Digital Health movement, poised to revolutionise health psychology research and practice in the coming years. This White Paper is positioned in the current context of the COVID-19 pandemic, exploring how digital health tools have rapidly gained popularity in 2020-2022, when world-wide health promotion and treatment efforts rapidly shifted from face-to-face to remote delivery. This statement is written by the Directors of the not-for-profit Open Digital Health initiative (n = 6), Experts attending the European Health Psychology Society Synergy Expert Meeting (n = 17), and the initiative consultant, following a two-day meeting (19-20th August 2021).</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":"16 4","pages":"475-491"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2022.2046482","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

In this White Paper, we outline recommendations from the perspective of health psychology and behavioural science, addressing three research gaps: (1) What methods in the health psychology research toolkit can be best used for developing and evaluating digital health tools? (2) What are the most feasible strategies to reuse digital health tools across populations and settings? (3) What are the main advantages and challenges of sharing (openly publishing) data, code, intervention content and design features of digital health tools? We provide actionable suggestions for researchers joining the continuously growing Open Digital Health movement, poised to revolutionise health psychology research and practice in the coming years. This White Paper is positioned in the current context of the COVID-19 pandemic, exploring how digital health tools have rapidly gained popularity in 2020-2022, when world-wide health promotion and treatment efforts rapidly shifted from face-to-face to remote delivery. This statement is written by the Directors of the not-for-profit Open Digital Health initiative (n = 6), Experts attending the European Health Psychology Society Synergy Expert Meeting (n = 17), and the initiative consultant, following a two-day meeting (19-20th August 2021).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
白皮书:开放的数字健康——加速透明和可扩展的健康促进和治疗。
在本白皮书中,我们从健康心理学和行为科学的角度概述了建议,解决了三个研究空白:(1)健康心理学研究工具包中的哪些方法最适合用于开发和评估数字健康工具?(2)在人群和环境中重用数字卫生工具的最可行策略是什么?(3)共享(公开发布)数字健康工具的数据、代码、干预内容和设计特征的主要优势和挑战是什么?我们为参与持续增长的开放数字健康运动的研究人员提供可操作的建议,准备在未来几年彻底改变健康心理学的研究和实践。本白皮书定位于2019冠状病毒病大流行的当前背景,探讨数字卫生工具如何在2020-2022年迅速普及,当时全球健康促进和治疗工作迅速从面对面转向远程提供。本声明由非营利性开放数字健康倡议的主任(n = 6)、参加欧洲健康心理学学会协同专家会议的专家(n = 17)和倡议顾问在为期两天的会议(2021年8月19日至20日)之后撰写。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Psychology Review
Health Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The publication of Health Psychology Review (HPR) marks a significant milestone in the field of health psychology, as it is the first review journal dedicated to this important and rapidly growing discipline. Edited by a highly respected team, HPR provides a critical platform for the review, development of theories, and conceptual advancements in health psychology. This prestigious international forum not only contributes to the progress of health psychology but also fosters its connection with the broader field of psychology and other related academic and professional domains. With its vital insights, HPR is a must-read for those involved in the study, teaching, and practice of health psychology, behavioral medicine, and related areas.
期刊最新文献
The prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder symptomatology and diagnosis in burn survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Yoga as an intervention for stress: a meta-analysis. Analytical decisions pose moral questions. Components of multiple health behaviour change interventions for patients with chronic conditions: a systematic review and meta-regression of randomized trials. Identifying the psychosocial barriers and facilitators associated with the uptake of genetic services for hereditary cancer syndromes: a systematic review of qualitative studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1