Association Between the Use of Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors and the Risk of Cancer Among Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: A Nationwide, Population-Based, Retrospective Cohort Study

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY American Journal of Clinical Dermatology Pub Date : 2023-06-06 DOI:10.1007/s40257-023-00787-3
Hao-Hsin Huang, Dereck Shen, Tom C. Chan, Yung-Tsu Cho, Chao-Hsiun Tang, Chia-Yu Chu
{"title":"Association Between the Use of Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors and the Risk of Cancer Among Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: A Nationwide, Population-Based, Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Hao-Hsin Huang,&nbsp;Dereck Shen,&nbsp;Tom C. Chan,&nbsp;Yung-Tsu Cho,&nbsp;Chao-Hsiun Tang,&nbsp;Chia-Yu Chu","doi":"10.1007/s40257-023-00787-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Importance</h3><p>The cancer risks associated with treatment with topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) remain controversial, and limited evidence exists regarding the cancer risks among patients with AD treated with TCIs in Asian populations.</p><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study identified the association between TCI use and the risks of developing all cancers, lymphoma, skin cancers, and other cancers.</p><h3>Design</h3><p>This study was a nationwide, population-based, retrospective cohort study.</p><h3>Setting</h3><p>Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database.</p><h3>Participants</h3><p>Patients diagnosed at least twice with ICD-9 code 691 or at least one time with ICD-9 codes 691 or 692.9 within 1 year between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2010 were included and followed until 31 December 2018. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using the Cox proportional hazard ratio model.</p><h3>Exposures</h3><p>Patients using tacrolimus or pimecrolimus were identified in the National Health Insurance Research Database and compared with patients using topical corticosteroids (TCSs).</p><h3>Main Outcomes and Measures</h3><p>The main outcomes were hazard ratios (HRs) of cancer diagnoses and associated outcomes obtained from the Taiwan Cancer Registry database.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>After propensity score (PS) matching, the final cohort included 195,925 patients with AD, including 39,185 who were initial TCI users and 156,740 who were TCS users. Propensity score matching was performed according to age, sex, index year, and Charlson Comorbidity Index using a ratio of 1:4. Except for leukemia, HR and 95% CI showed no significant associations between TCI use and the risk of developing all cancer, lymphoma, skin cancers, and other cancers. Sensitivity analysis showed that the lag time HRs for every cancer subtype continued to show no significant association between TCI use and cancer risk, except for leukemia.</p><h3>Conclusions and Relevance</h3><p>Our study found no evidence to support an association between TCI use and the risks of almost all cancers compared with TCS use in patients with AD, but physicians should be aware of potentially higher risks of leukemia with TCI use. This study represents the first population-based study focused on the cancer risk of TCI use among patients with AD in an Asian population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40257-023-00787-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Importance

The cancer risks associated with treatment with topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) remain controversial, and limited evidence exists regarding the cancer risks among patients with AD treated with TCIs in Asian populations.

Objectives

This study identified the association between TCI use and the risks of developing all cancers, lymphoma, skin cancers, and other cancers.

Design

This study was a nationwide, population-based, retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database.

Participants

Patients diagnosed at least twice with ICD-9 code 691 or at least one time with ICD-9 codes 691 or 692.9 within 1 year between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2010 were included and followed until 31 December 2018. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using the Cox proportional hazard ratio model.

Exposures

Patients using tacrolimus or pimecrolimus were identified in the National Health Insurance Research Database and compared with patients using topical corticosteroids (TCSs).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcomes were hazard ratios (HRs) of cancer diagnoses and associated outcomes obtained from the Taiwan Cancer Registry database.

Results

After propensity score (PS) matching, the final cohort included 195,925 patients with AD, including 39,185 who were initial TCI users and 156,740 who were TCS users. Propensity score matching was performed according to age, sex, index year, and Charlson Comorbidity Index using a ratio of 1:4. Except for leukemia, HR and 95% CI showed no significant associations between TCI use and the risk of developing all cancer, lymphoma, skin cancers, and other cancers. Sensitivity analysis showed that the lag time HRs for every cancer subtype continued to show no significant association between TCI use and cancer risk, except for leukemia.

Conclusions and Relevance

Our study found no evidence to support an association between TCI use and the risks of almost all cancers compared with TCS use in patients with AD, but physicians should be aware of potentially higher risks of leukemia with TCI use. This study represents the first population-based study focused on the cancer risk of TCI use among patients with AD in an Asian population.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特应性皮炎患者使用局部钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂与癌症风险的相关性:一项全国性、基于人群的回顾性队列研究
重要事项特应性皮炎(AD)患者与局部钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂(TCI)治疗相关的癌症风险仍然存在争议,关于亚洲人群中接受TCI治疗的AD患者癌症风险的证据有限。目的本研究确定了TCI的使用与发展为所有癌症、淋巴瘤、皮肤癌和其他癌症的风险之间的关系。设计本研究是一项全国性、基于人群的回顾性队列研究。设置台湾国家健康保险研究数据库。参与者在2003年1月1日至2010年12月31日的一年内被诊断为至少两次ICD-9代码691或至少一次ICD-9691或692.9的患者被纳入并随访至2018年12月。使用Cox比例风险比模型估计风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)。暴露在国家健康保险研究数据库中确定使用他克莫司或吡美莫司的患者,并与使用局部皮质类固醇(TCSs)的患者进行比较。主要结果和测量主要结果是从台湾癌症登记数据库中获得的癌症诊断的危险比(HR)和相关结果。结果在倾向评分(PS)匹配后,最终队列包括195925名AD患者,其中39185人为初次TCI使用者,156740人为TCS使用者。根据年龄、性别、指标年份和Charlson共病指数,按1:4的比例进行倾向性评分匹配。除白血病外,HR和95%CI显示TCI的使用与发展为所有癌症、淋巴瘤、皮肤癌和其他癌症的风险之间没有显著关联。敏感性分析表明,除白血病外,每种癌症亚型的滞后时间HR继续显示TCI使用与癌症风险之间没有显著关联。结论和相关性我们的研究没有发现任何证据支持在AD患者中使用TCI与使用TCS相比,几乎所有癌症的风险之间存在关联,但医生应该意识到使用TCI可能会增加患白血病的风险。这项研究是第一项基于人群的研究,重点关注亚洲人群中AD患者使用TCI的癌症风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
84
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Clinical Dermatology is dedicated to evidence-based therapy and effective patient management in dermatology. It publishes critical review articles and clinically focused original research covering comprehensive aspects of dermatological conditions. The journal enhances visibility and educational value through features like Key Points summaries, plain language summaries, and various digital elements, ensuring accessibility and depth for a diverse readership.
期刊最新文献
KECORT Study: An International e-Delphi Study on the Treatment of KEloids Using Intralesional CORTicosteroids in Clinical Practice Predicting the Time to Relapse Following Withdrawal from Different Biologics in Patients with Psoriasis who Responded to Therapy: A 12-Year Multicenter Cohort Study Update on Stevens–Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: Diagnosis and Management A Practice Approach to Acne Fulminans in Adolescents Image-Based Artificial Intelligence in Psoriasis Assessment: The Beginning of a New Diagnostic Era?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1