Preoperative Oswestry Disability Index Cannot Reliably Predict Patient Satisfaction After Single and Double Level Lumbar Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Surgery.
Bryon Jun Xiong Teo, Tet Sen Howe, Cheri Chan, Joyce Sb Koh, William Yeo, Yeong Huei Ng
{"title":"Preoperative Oswestry Disability Index Cannot Reliably Predict Patient Satisfaction After Single and Double Level Lumbar Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Surgery.","authors":"Bryon Jun Xiong Teo, Tet Sen Howe, Cheri Chan, Joyce Sb Koh, William Yeo, Yeong Huei Ng","doi":"10.1177/21514593231152172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The role of patient-reported outcomes in preoperative assessment is not well studied. There is recent interest in studying whether Patient-reported outcomes scores can be used either independently, or in conjunction with clinical findings, in the assessment of patients for surgery.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate if improvement in clinically significant scores correlate with post-operative patient satisfaction in 1-2 level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery. We also aim to define a threshold Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) which correlate with achieving post-operative MCID and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1001 patients who underwent single or double level TLIF (Minimally invasive and Open) in our institution with at least 2 years follow up were included in this study. We studied self-reported measures including patient satisfaction and ODI score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 2-year follow-up, the overall mean ODI score improved from 49.7 ± 18.3 to 13.9 ± 15.2 (<i>P</i> < 0.001) with 74.6% of patients meeting the MCID. Patient satisfaction was achieved in 95.3% of all patients. In the MIS group, the preoperative cut-off was determined to be 37.2 at maximal Youden index associated with AUC of 0.72 (95% CI 0.65-0.86). In the open group, the preoperative cut-off was determined to be 37.2 at maximal Youden index associated with AUC of 0.70 (95% CI 0.62-0.77). Using the preoperative cut-offs found, there was no significant difference in patient satisfaction in both MIS and open groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, our patients undergoing TLIF had good 2-year ODI score improvement and patient satisfaction after surgery. While meeting the MCID for ODI score correlates with patients' satisfaction postoperatively, 75% of patients not meeting the MCID for ODI score remained satisfied with the surgery. We are unable to define a threshold pre-operative ODI which correlates with achieving post-operative MCID and patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":48568,"journal":{"name":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","volume":"14 ","pages":"21514593231152172"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1f/97/10.1177_21514593231152172.PMC9846293.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593231152172","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The role of patient-reported outcomes in preoperative assessment is not well studied. There is recent interest in studying whether Patient-reported outcomes scores can be used either independently, or in conjunction with clinical findings, in the assessment of patients for surgery.
Aims: To investigate if improvement in clinically significant scores correlate with post-operative patient satisfaction in 1-2 level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery. We also aim to define a threshold Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) which correlate with achieving post-operative MCID and patient satisfaction.
Methods: 1001 patients who underwent single or double level TLIF (Minimally invasive and Open) in our institution with at least 2 years follow up were included in this study. We studied self-reported measures including patient satisfaction and ODI score.
Results: At 2-year follow-up, the overall mean ODI score improved from 49.7 ± 18.3 to 13.9 ± 15.2 (P < 0.001) with 74.6% of patients meeting the MCID. Patient satisfaction was achieved in 95.3% of all patients. In the MIS group, the preoperative cut-off was determined to be 37.2 at maximal Youden index associated with AUC of 0.72 (95% CI 0.65-0.86). In the open group, the preoperative cut-off was determined to be 37.2 at maximal Youden index associated with AUC of 0.70 (95% CI 0.62-0.77). Using the preoperative cut-offs found, there was no significant difference in patient satisfaction in both MIS and open groups.
Conclusions: Overall, our patients undergoing TLIF had good 2-year ODI score improvement and patient satisfaction after surgery. While meeting the MCID for ODI score correlates with patients' satisfaction postoperatively, 75% of patients not meeting the MCID for ODI score remained satisfied with the surgery. We are unable to define a threshold pre-operative ODI which correlates with achieving post-operative MCID and patient satisfaction.
患者报告的预后在术前评估中的作用尚未得到很好的研究。最近有兴趣研究患者报告的结果评分是否可以单独使用,或者与临床结果结合使用,以评估手术患者。目的:探讨1-2节段经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)患者术后满意度与临床意义评分的改善是否相关。我们还旨在定义一个阈值Oswestry残疾指数(ODI),该指数与实现术后MCID和患者满意度相关。方法:1001例在我院行单节段或双节段TLIF(微创开放)手术并随访2年以上的患者。我们研究了自我报告的措施,包括患者满意度和ODI评分。结果:随访2年,总体平均ODI评分由49.7±18.3分改善至13.9±15.2分(P < 0.001), 74.6%的患者达到MCID。95.3%的患者满意率。在MIS组,术前cut-off确定为37.2,最大约登指数,AUC为0.72 (95% CI 0.65-0.86)。在开放组,术前cut-off确定为37.2,最大约登指数,AUC为0.70 (95% CI 0.62-0.77)。使用术前截点发现,MIS组和开放组的患者满意度无显著差异。结论:总体而言,接受TLIF的患者术后2年ODI评分改善良好,患者满意度较高。虽然达到ODI评分的MCID与患者术后满意度相关,但75%未达到ODI评分的患者仍对手术满意。我们无法定义一个与术后MCID和患者满意度相关的术前ODI阈值。
期刊介绍:
Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation (GOS) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that provides clinical information concerning musculoskeletal conditions affecting the aging population. GOS focuses on care of geriatric orthopaedic patients and their subsequent rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).