Robust neural tracking of linguistic speech representations using a convolutional neural network.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Journal of neural engineering Pub Date : 2023-08-30 DOI:10.1088/1741-2552/acf1ce
Corentin Puffay, Jonas Vanthornhout, Marlies Gillis, Bernd Accou, Hugo Van Hamme, Tom Francart
{"title":"Robust neural tracking of linguistic speech representations using a convolutional neural network.","authors":"Corentin Puffay,&nbsp;Jonas Vanthornhout,&nbsp;Marlies Gillis,&nbsp;Bernd Accou,&nbsp;Hugo Van Hamme,&nbsp;Tom Francart","doi":"10.1088/1741-2552/acf1ce","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>When listening to continuous speech, populations of neurons in the brain track different features of the signal. Neural tracking can be measured by relating the electroencephalography (EEG) and the speech signal. Recent studies have shown a significant contribution of linguistic features over acoustic neural tracking using linear models. However, linear models cannot model the nonlinear dynamics of the brain. To overcome this, we use a convolutional neural network (CNN) that relates EEG to linguistic features using phoneme or word onsets as a control and has the capacity to model non-linear relations.<i>Approach.</i>We integrate phoneme- and word-based linguistic features (phoneme surprisal, cohort entropy (CE), word surprisal (WS) and word frequency (WF)) in our nonlinear CNN model and investigate if they carry additional information on top of lexical features (phoneme and word onsets). We then compare the performance of our nonlinear CNN with that of a linear encoder and a linearized CNN.<i>Main results.</i>For the non-linear CNN, we found a significant contribution of CE over phoneme onsets and of WS and WF over word onsets. Moreover, the non-linear CNN outperformed the linear baselines.<i>Significance.</i>Measuring coding of linguistic features in the brain is important for auditory neuroscience research and applications that involve objectively measuring speech understanding. With linear models, this is measurable, but the effects are very small. The proposed non-linear CNN model yields larger differences between linguistic and lexical models and, therefore, could show effects that would otherwise be unmeasurable and may, in the future, lead to improved within-subject measures and shorter recordings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neural engineering","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neural engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/acf1ce","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective.When listening to continuous speech, populations of neurons in the brain track different features of the signal. Neural tracking can be measured by relating the electroencephalography (EEG) and the speech signal. Recent studies have shown a significant contribution of linguistic features over acoustic neural tracking using linear models. However, linear models cannot model the nonlinear dynamics of the brain. To overcome this, we use a convolutional neural network (CNN) that relates EEG to linguistic features using phoneme or word onsets as a control and has the capacity to model non-linear relations.Approach.We integrate phoneme- and word-based linguistic features (phoneme surprisal, cohort entropy (CE), word surprisal (WS) and word frequency (WF)) in our nonlinear CNN model and investigate if they carry additional information on top of lexical features (phoneme and word onsets). We then compare the performance of our nonlinear CNN with that of a linear encoder and a linearized CNN.Main results.For the non-linear CNN, we found a significant contribution of CE over phoneme onsets and of WS and WF over word onsets. Moreover, the non-linear CNN outperformed the linear baselines.Significance.Measuring coding of linguistic features in the brain is important for auditory neuroscience research and applications that involve objectively measuring speech understanding. With linear models, this is measurable, but the effects are very small. The proposed non-linear CNN model yields larger differences between linguistic and lexical models and, therefore, could show effects that would otherwise be unmeasurable and may, in the future, lead to improved within-subject measures and shorter recordings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于卷积神经网络的语言语音表征鲁棒神经跟踪。
目标。当听到连续的讲话时,大脑中的神经元群会追踪信号的不同特征。神经跟踪可以通过脑电图(EEG)和语音信号的关联来测量。最近的研究表明,语言特征对使用线性模型的声学神经跟踪有重要贡献。然而,线性模型不能模拟大脑的非线性动力学。为了克服这个问题,我们使用卷积神经网络(CNN)将脑电图与语言特征联系起来,使用音素或词开始作为控制,并具有建模非线性关系的能力。我们将基于音素和词的语言特征(音素惊讶,队列熵(CE),词惊讶(WS)和词频(WF))集成在我们的非线性CNN模型中,并研究它们是否在词汇特征(音素和词开始)之上携带额外的信息。然后,我们将我们的非线性CNN与线性编码器和线性化CNN的性能进行比较。主要的结果。对于非线性CNN,我们发现CE对音素启动有显著贡献,WS和WF对单词启动有显著贡献。此外,非线性CNN的表现优于线性基线。意义:测量大脑中语言特征的编码对于涉及客观测量语音理解的听觉神经科学研究和应用非常重要。使用线性模型,这是可测量的,但影响非常小。所提出的非线性CNN模型在语言和词汇模型之间产生了更大的差异,因此,可以显示出否则无法测量的效果,并且可能在未来导致改进的主题内测量和更短的记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neural engineering
Journal of neural engineering 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
319
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: The goal of Journal of Neural Engineering (JNE) is to act as a forum for the interdisciplinary field of neural engineering where neuroscientists, neurobiologists and engineers can publish their work in one periodical that bridges the gap between neuroscience and engineering. The journal publishes articles in the field of neural engineering at the molecular, cellular and systems levels. The scope of the journal encompasses experimental, computational, theoretical, clinical and applied aspects of: Innovative neurotechnology; Brain-machine (computer) interface; Neural interfacing; Bioelectronic medicines; Neuromodulation; Neural prostheses; Neural control; Neuro-rehabilitation; Neurorobotics; Optical neural engineering; Neural circuits: artificial & biological; Neuromorphic engineering; Neural tissue regeneration; Neural signal processing; Theoretical and computational neuroscience; Systems neuroscience; Translational neuroscience; Neuroimaging.
期刊最新文献
Building consensus on clinical outcome assessments for BCI devices. A summary of the 10th BCI society meeting 2023 workshop. o-CLEAN: a novel multi-stage algorithm for the ocular artifacts' correction from EEG data in out-of-the-lab applications. PDMS/CNT electrodes with bioamplifier for practical in-the-ear and conventional biosignal recordings. DOCTer: a novel EEG-based diagnosis framework for disorders of consciousness. I see artifacts: ICA-based EEG artifact removal does not improve deep network decoding across three BCI tasks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1