Biomechanics analysis of seven Tai Chi movements

IF 2.3 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Medicine and Health Science Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.smhs.2022.06.002
Nok-Yeung Law, Jing Xian Li
{"title":"Biomechanics analysis of seven Tai Chi movements","authors":"Nok-Yeung Law,&nbsp;Jing Xian Li","doi":"10.1016/j.smhs.2022.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examined the maximum joint angles and moments, and electromyography (EMG) activity of the lower limbs in an experienced Tai Chi (TC) practitioner in performing four dynamic (Repulse Monkey, Wave-hand in Clouds, Brush Knee Twist Step, and Lateral Forward Step) and three static TC movements (Starting Form, Hero Touch Sky, and Push Hand Back) and compared them with the measures from walking. Integrated EMG (iEMG) and peak EMG of the rectus femoris, adductor longus, tibialis anterior, semitendinosus, erector spinae, gluteus medius, tensor fasciae latae, medial and lateral gastrocnemius muscles were analyzed. One-way analysis of variance showed that compared with walking, TC presented 1) significantly larger hip flexion (71.4° vs. 42.2°) and abduction angles (11.9° vs. 5.3°), smaller knee flexion (45.2° vs. 71.1°) and abduction angles (13.0° vs. 27.7°), larger ankle dorsiflexion (41.4° vs. 11.3°) and abduction angles (8.8° vs. 7.2°); 2) hip flexion moment and knee flexion and abduction moment were significantly larger. Ankle dorsiflexion moment were significantly smaller, whereas ankle abduction moment was significantly larger in two TC movements; and 3) the EMG activity of the muscles in TC varied from 10% to 610% of walking. The knee extensors, hip adductors and abductors had significantly higher peak EMG (430% ​± ​40%, 240% ​± ​30%, and 320% ​± ​90%) and iEMG values (610% ​± ​30%, 311% ​± ​30%, and 1.4% ​± ​20%), respectively. The findings suggested that these TC movements could be a good option for the improvement of muscle strength and range of motion of the lower limbs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33620,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine and Health Science","volume":"4 4","pages":"Pages 245-252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fe/02/main.PMC9806716.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine and Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666337622000385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study examined the maximum joint angles and moments, and electromyography (EMG) activity of the lower limbs in an experienced Tai Chi (TC) practitioner in performing four dynamic (Repulse Monkey, Wave-hand in Clouds, Brush Knee Twist Step, and Lateral Forward Step) and three static TC movements (Starting Form, Hero Touch Sky, and Push Hand Back) and compared them with the measures from walking. Integrated EMG (iEMG) and peak EMG of the rectus femoris, adductor longus, tibialis anterior, semitendinosus, erector spinae, gluteus medius, tensor fasciae latae, medial and lateral gastrocnemius muscles were analyzed. One-way analysis of variance showed that compared with walking, TC presented 1) significantly larger hip flexion (71.4° vs. 42.2°) and abduction angles (11.9° vs. 5.3°), smaller knee flexion (45.2° vs. 71.1°) and abduction angles (13.0° vs. 27.7°), larger ankle dorsiflexion (41.4° vs. 11.3°) and abduction angles (8.8° vs. 7.2°); 2) hip flexion moment and knee flexion and abduction moment were significantly larger. Ankle dorsiflexion moment were significantly smaller, whereas ankle abduction moment was significantly larger in two TC movements; and 3) the EMG activity of the muscles in TC varied from 10% to 610% of walking. The knee extensors, hip adductors and abductors had significantly higher peak EMG (430% ​± ​40%, 240% ​± ​30%, and 320% ​± ​90%) and iEMG values (610% ​± ​30%, 311% ​± ​30%, and 1.4% ​± ​20%), respectively. The findings suggested that these TC movements could be a good option for the improvement of muscle strength and range of motion of the lower limbs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
太极拳七种动作的生物力学分析
本研究检测了一位有经验的太极拳练习者在进行四种动态动作(反扑猴、云中挥手、刷膝扭步、横向向前步)和三种静态动作(起跑、英雄触天、推手后退)时下肢的最大关节角、关节力矩和肌电活动,并将其与步行的测量结果进行了比较。分析股直肌、长内收肌、胫前肌、半腱肌、竖脊肌、臀中肌、阔筋膜张肌、腓肠肌内外侧肌的综合肌电信号(iEMG)和峰值肌电信号。单向方差分析显示,与步行相比,TC的髋关节屈曲度(71.4°比42.2°)和外展角(11.9°比5.3°)明显增大,膝关节屈曲度(45.2°比71.1°)和外展角(13.0°比27.7°)明显减小,踝关节背屈度(41.4°比11.3°)和外展角(8.8°比7.2°)明显增大;2)髋屈曲力矩、膝关节屈曲外展力矩明显增大。两组患者踝关节背屈力矩均显著小于外展力矩,踝关节外展力矩均显著大于外展力矩;③TC组肌肉肌电活动在步行的10% ~ 610%之间变化。膝关节伸肌、髋关节内收肌和外展肌的EMG峰值分别为430%±40%、240%±30%和320%±90%,iEMG峰值分别为610%±30%、311%±30%和1.4%±20%。研究结果表明,这些TC运动可能是改善肌肉力量和下肢活动范围的一个很好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Medicine and Health Science
Sports Medicine and Health Science Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
55 days
期刊最新文献
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cardiovascular health in sedentary and athletes: Consensus, uncertainties, and ways for mitigation The effects of prolonged sitting behavior on resting-state brain functional connectivity in college students post-COVID-19 rehabilitation: A study based on fNIRS technology Effects of COVID-19 on the cardiovascular system: A mendelian randomization study Relationship between infection, physical and mental health and exercise habits of some Chinese residents after recovery from COVID-19 Changes in physical activity and sleep following the COVID-19 pandemic on a university campus: Perception versus reality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1