Prevalence of dental implant positioning errors: A cross-sectional study.

IF 1.7 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Imaging Science in Dentistry Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.5624/isd.20220059
Gabriel Rizzo, Mayara Colpo Prado, Lilian Rigo
{"title":"Prevalence of dental implant positioning errors: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Gabriel Rizzo,&nbsp;Mayara Colpo Prado,&nbsp;Lilian Rigo","doi":"10.5624/isd.20220059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the prevalence of dental implant positioning errors and the most frequently affected oral regions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A sample was obtained of CBCT images of 590 dental implants from 230 individuals who underwent diagnosis at a radiology center using cone-beam computed tomography from 2017 to 2020. The following variables were considered: thread exposure, violation of the minimum distance between 2 adjacent implants and between the implant and tooth, and implant contact with anatomical structures. Descriptive data analysis and the Pearson chi-square test (<i>P</i><0.05) were performed to compare findings according to mouth regions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most (74.4%) of the 590 implants were poorly positioned, with the posterior region of the maxilla being the region most frequently affected by errors. Among the variables analyzed, the most prevalent was thread exposure (54.7%), followed by implant contact with anatomical structures, violation of the recommended distance between 2 implants and violation of the recommended distance between the implant and teeth. Thread exposure was significantly associated with the anterior region of the mandible (<i>P</i><0.05). The anterior region of the maxilla was associated with violation of the recommended tooth-implant distance (<i>P</i><0.05) and the recommended distance between 2 adjacent implants (<i>P</i><0.05). Implant contact with anatomical structures was significantly more likely to occur in the posterior region of the maxilla (<i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many implants were poorly positioned in the posterior region of the maxilla. Thread exposure was particularly frequent and was significantly associated with the anterior region of the mandible.</p>","PeriodicalId":51714,"journal":{"name":"Imaging Science in Dentistry","volume":"52 4","pages":"343-350"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e1/83/isd-52-343.PMC9807798.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging Science in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.20220059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the prevalence of dental implant positioning errors and the most frequently affected oral regions.

Materials and methods: A sample was obtained of CBCT images of 590 dental implants from 230 individuals who underwent diagnosis at a radiology center using cone-beam computed tomography from 2017 to 2020. The following variables were considered: thread exposure, violation of the minimum distance between 2 adjacent implants and between the implant and tooth, and implant contact with anatomical structures. Descriptive data analysis and the Pearson chi-square test (P<0.05) were performed to compare findings according to mouth regions.

Results: Most (74.4%) of the 590 implants were poorly positioned, with the posterior region of the maxilla being the region most frequently affected by errors. Among the variables analyzed, the most prevalent was thread exposure (54.7%), followed by implant contact with anatomical structures, violation of the recommended distance between 2 implants and violation of the recommended distance between the implant and teeth. Thread exposure was significantly associated with the anterior region of the mandible (P<0.05). The anterior region of the maxilla was associated with violation of the recommended tooth-implant distance (P<0.05) and the recommended distance between 2 adjacent implants (P<0.05). Implant contact with anatomical structures was significantly more likely to occur in the posterior region of the maxilla (P<0.05).

Conclusion: Many implants were poorly positioned in the posterior region of the maxilla. Thread exposure was particularly frequent and was significantly associated with the anterior region of the mandible.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙种植体定位错误的普遍性:一项横断面研究。
目的:本研究评估种植体定位错误的流行程度和最常受影响的口腔区域。材料和方法:从2017年至2020年在放射学中心使用锥束计算机断层扫描诊断的230名患者中获得590颗牙种植体的CBCT图像样本。考虑以下变量:螺纹暴露,违反相邻种植体之间和种植体与牙齿之间的最小距离,种植体与解剖结构的接触。描述性数据分析和Pearson卡方检验(结果:590个种植体中大多数(74.4%)定位不佳,上颌后区是最常受错误影响的区域。在分析的变量中,最常见的是螺纹暴露(54.7%),其次是种植体与解剖结构的接触,违反2个种植体之间的推荐距离以及违反种植体与牙齿之间的推荐距离。结论:许多种植体在上颌骨后区定位不良。螺纹暴露尤其频繁,并与下颌骨前区显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Imaging Science in Dentistry
Imaging Science in Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
Classification of mandibular molar furcation involvement in periapical radiographs by deep learning. Clinical validity and precision of deep learning-based cone-beam computed tomography automatic landmarking algorithm. Combination of metal artifact reduction and sharpening filter application for horizontal root fracture diagnosis in teeth adjacent to a zirconia implant. Erratum to: McCune-Albright syndrome with acromegaly: A case report with characteristic radiographic features of fibrous dysplasia. Evaluation of deep learning and convolutional neural network algorithms for mandibular fracture detection using radiographic images: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1