Apremilast Long-Term Safety Up to 5 Years from 15 Pooled Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Studies of Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Behçet’s Syndrome

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY American Journal of Clinical Dermatology Pub Date : 2023-06-14 DOI:10.1007/s40257-023-00783-7
Philip J. Mease, Gülen Hatemi, Maria Paris, Sue Cheng, Peter Maes, Wendy Zhang, Rebecca Shi, Andrea Flower, Hernan Picard, Linda Stein Gold
{"title":"Apremilast Long-Term Safety Up to 5 Years from 15 Pooled Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Studies of Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Behçet’s Syndrome","authors":"Philip J. Mease,&nbsp;Gülen Hatemi,&nbsp;Maria Paris,&nbsp;Sue Cheng,&nbsp;Peter Maes,&nbsp;Wendy Zhang,&nbsp;Rebecca Shi,&nbsp;Andrea Flower,&nbsp;Hernan Picard,&nbsp;Linda Stein Gold","doi":"10.1007/s40257-023-00783-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Since US FDA approval in 2014, apremilast has consistently demonstrated a favorable benefit–risk profile in 706,585 patients (557,379 patient-years of exposure) worldwide across approved indications of plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and Behçet’s syndrome; however, long-term exposure across these indications has not been reported.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to conduct a pooled analysis of apremilast data from 15 clinical studies with open-label extension phases, focusing on long-term safety.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We analyzed longer-term safety and tolerability of apremilast 30 mg twice daily across three indications for up to 5 years, focusing on adverse events of special interest, including thrombotic events, malignancies, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), serious infections, and depression. Data were pooled across 15 randomized, placebo-controlled studies and divided into placebo-controlled or all-apremilast-exposure groups. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 4183 patients were exposed to apremilast (6788 patient-years). Most TEAEs were mild to moderate in the placebo-controlled period (96.6%) and throughout all apremilast exposure (91.6%). TEAE rates of special interest were similar between treatment groups in the placebo-controlled period and remained low throughout all apremilast exposure. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates per 100 patient-years during all apremilast exposure were MACE, 0.30; thrombotic events, 0.10; malignancies, 1.0; serious infections, 1.10; serious opportunistic infections, 0.21; and depression, 1.78. Safety findings were consistent across indications and regions. No new safety signals were identified.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The incidence of serious TEAEs and TEAEs of special interest was low despite long-term exposure, further establishing apremilast as a safe oral option for long-term use across indications with a favorable benefit–risk profile.</p><h3>Clinical Trial Registration</h3><p>NCT00773734, NCT01194219, NCT01232283, NCT01690299, NCT01988103, NCT02425826, NCT03123471, NCT03721172, NCT01172938, NCT01212757, NCT01212770, NCT01307423, NCT01925768, NCT00866359, NCT02307513.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n <div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/08/b9/40257_2023_Article_783.PMC10266699.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40257-023-00783-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

Since US FDA approval in 2014, apremilast has consistently demonstrated a favorable benefit–risk profile in 706,585 patients (557,379 patient-years of exposure) worldwide across approved indications of plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and Behçet’s syndrome; however, long-term exposure across these indications has not been reported.

Objective

The aim of this study was to conduct a pooled analysis of apremilast data from 15 clinical studies with open-label extension phases, focusing on long-term safety.

Methods

We analyzed longer-term safety and tolerability of apremilast 30 mg twice daily across three indications for up to 5 years, focusing on adverse events of special interest, including thrombotic events, malignancies, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), serious infections, and depression. Data were pooled across 15 randomized, placebo-controlled studies and divided into placebo-controlled or all-apremilast-exposure groups. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed.

Results

Overall, 4183 patients were exposed to apremilast (6788 patient-years). Most TEAEs were mild to moderate in the placebo-controlled period (96.6%) and throughout all apremilast exposure (91.6%). TEAE rates of special interest were similar between treatment groups in the placebo-controlled period and remained low throughout all apremilast exposure. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates per 100 patient-years during all apremilast exposure were MACE, 0.30; thrombotic events, 0.10; malignancies, 1.0; serious infections, 1.10; serious opportunistic infections, 0.21; and depression, 1.78. Safety findings were consistent across indications and regions. No new safety signals were identified.

Conclusions

The incidence of serious TEAEs and TEAEs of special interest was low despite long-term exposure, further establishing apremilast as a safe oral option for long-term use across indications with a favorable benefit–risk profile.

Clinical Trial Registration

NCT00773734, NCT01194219, NCT01232283, NCT01690299, NCT01988103, NCT02425826, NCT03123471, NCT03721172, NCT01172938, NCT01212757, NCT01212770, NCT01307423, NCT01925768, NCT00866359, NCT02307513.

Graphical Abstract

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Apremlast对银屑病、银屑病关节炎和Behçet综合征的15项随机安慰剂对照研究的5年长期安全性
背景自2014年美国食品药品监督管理局批准以来,阿普司特在全球706585名患者(557379名患者-年暴露)中,在斑块型银屑病、银屑病关节炎和Behçet综合征的批准适应症中,一直显示出良好的获益-风险状况;然而,这些适应症的长期暴露尚未报道。目的本研究的目的是对15项具有开放标签扩展阶段的临床研究的阿普司特数据进行汇总分析,重点关注长期安全性。方法我们分析了阿普司特30 mg,每日两次,在三种适应症中持续5年的长期安全性和耐受性,重点关注特别关注的不良事件,包括血栓性事件、恶性肿瘤、主要心脏不良事件(MACE)、严重感染和抑郁。数据集中在15项随机、安慰剂对照研究中,并分为安慰剂对照组或所有阿普司特暴露组。评估治疗突发不良事件(TEAE)。结果4183例患者(6788例-年)暴露于阿普司特。在安慰剂对照期(96.6%)和所有阿普司特暴露期间(91.6%),大多数TEAE为轻度至中度。在安慰剂对照期间,治疗组之间特别感兴趣的TEAE发生率相似,并且在所有阿普司特暴露期间保持较低。在所有四月暴露期间,每100名患者年的暴露调整后发病率为MACE,0.30;血栓性事件,0.10;恶性肿瘤,1.0;严重感染1.10;严重机会性感染0.21;抑郁症1.78。各适应症和区域的安全性结果一致。没有发现新的安全信号。结论尽管长期暴露,但严重的TEAE和特别感兴趣的TEAE的发生率较低,这进一步证明了阿培司特是一种安全的口服选择,可在各种适应症中长期使用,具有良好的获益-风险状况。临床试验注册NCT00773734、NCT01194219、NCT01232283、NCT01690299、NCTO1988103、NCTO2425826、NCT03123471、NCT03721172、NCT01172938、NCT01212757、NCT0121 2770、NCT01307423、NCTO 1925768、NCTO 0866359、NCT02307513。图形摘要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
84
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Clinical Dermatology is dedicated to evidence-based therapy and effective patient management in dermatology. It publishes critical review articles and clinically focused original research covering comprehensive aspects of dermatological conditions. The journal enhances visibility and educational value through features like Key Points summaries, plain language summaries, and various digital elements, ensuring accessibility and depth for a diverse readership.
期刊最新文献
Disseminated Superficial Actinic Porokeratosis: A Systematic Treatment Review. Patient-Reported Hair Loss and Its Impacts as Measured by the Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes Instrument in Patients Treated with Ritlecitinib: The ALLEGRO Phase 2b/3 Randomized Clinical Trial. From Compression to Itch: Exploring the Link Between Nerve Compression and Neuropathic Pruritus. Authors’ Reply to Wang et al., “Comment on ‘Efficacy and Safety of Brodalumab, an Anti‑interleukin‑17 Receptor A Monoclonal Antibody, for Palmoplantar Pustulosis: 16‑Week Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial’” Comment on “Efficacy and Safety of Brodalumab, an Anti‑interleukin‑17 Receptor A Monoclonal Antibody, for Palmoplantar Pustulosis: 16‑Week Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1