Mitigating the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with multiple myeloma receiving immunomodulatory-based therapy.

IF 2.9 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program Pub Date : 2022-12-09 DOI:10.1182/hematology.2022000414
Fahrettin Covut, Kristen M Sanfilippo
{"title":"Mitigating the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with multiple myeloma receiving immunomodulatory-based therapy.","authors":"Fahrettin Covut,&nbsp;Kristen M Sanfilippo","doi":"10.1182/hematology.2022000414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have up to a 20-fold increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared with the general population, with most events occurring within the first 6 months of diagnosis. Treatment with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) is a strong risk factor for VTE in MM. In a meta-analysis of 2 large, randomized trials comparing anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis vs placebo in ambulatory patients with cancer at high risk of VTE based on a validated risk score, the risk of VTE decreased without increasing the risk of major bleeding. However, few patients with MM participated in these trials (1.1%). Initial guidance for risk-stratifying patients with MM resulted in persistent rates of VTE >10% and highlighted the need for improved VTE risk stratification in patients with MM. Three validated risk scores are now available to quantify risk of VTE in patients with MM: SAVED, IMPEDE VTE, and PRISM scores. Using best available data, thromboprophylaxis should be strongly considered in patients with MM assessed as high risk for VTE, especially newly diagnosed patients receiving IMiD-based combination therapies. However, prospective studies are needed to further validate available models and identify the optimal thromboprophylactic agent for each VTE risk category.</p>","PeriodicalId":12973,"journal":{"name":"Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program","volume":"2022 1","pages":"363-367"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9820182/pdf/hem.2022000414.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/hematology.2022000414","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have up to a 20-fold increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared with the general population, with most events occurring within the first 6 months of diagnosis. Treatment with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) is a strong risk factor for VTE in MM. In a meta-analysis of 2 large, randomized trials comparing anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis vs placebo in ambulatory patients with cancer at high risk of VTE based on a validated risk score, the risk of VTE decreased without increasing the risk of major bleeding. However, few patients with MM participated in these trials (1.1%). Initial guidance for risk-stratifying patients with MM resulted in persistent rates of VTE >10% and highlighted the need for improved VTE risk stratification in patients with MM. Three validated risk scores are now available to quantify risk of VTE in patients with MM: SAVED, IMPEDE VTE, and PRISM scores. Using best available data, thromboprophylaxis should be strongly considered in patients with MM assessed as high risk for VTE, especially newly diagnosed patients receiving IMiD-based combination therapies. However, prospective studies are needed to further validate available models and identify the optimal thromboprophylactic agent for each VTE risk category.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减轻接受免疫调节治疗的多发性骨髓瘤患者静脉血栓栓塞的风险。
与一般人群相比,多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者发生静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的风险增加了20倍,大多数事件发生在诊断后的前6个月内。免疫调节药物(IMiDs)治疗是MM静脉血栓栓塞的一个重要危险因素。在2项大型随机试验的荟萃分析中,基于有效的风险评分,比较静脉血栓栓塞高风险的癌症门诊患者抗凝血栓预防与安慰剂,静脉血栓栓塞风险降低,但未增加大出血风险。然而,很少有MM患者参加了这些试验(1.1%)。MM患者风险分层的初步指导导致VTE持续发生率>10%,并强调需要改善MM患者的VTE风险分层。目前有三个经过验证的风险评分可用于量化MM患者的VTE风险:SAVED、阻碍VTE和PRISM评分。根据现有的最佳数据,对于被评估为静脉血栓栓塞高风险的MM患者,特别是接受imid联合治疗的新诊断患者,应强烈考虑血栓预防。然而,需要前瞻性研究来进一步验证可用的模型,并为每个静脉血栓栓塞风险类别确定最佳的血栓预防药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program
Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-HEMATOLOGY
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Hematology, the ASH Education Program, is published annually by the American Society of Hematology (ASH) in one volume per year.
期刊最新文献
Atypical CML: diagnosis and treatment. Langerhans cell histiocytosis: promises and caveats of targeted therapies in high-risk and CNS disease. Multiple myeloma: a paradigm for blending community and academic care. The sum of the parts: what we can and cannot learn from comorbidity scores in allogeneic transplantation. Thrombopoietin receptor agonists for chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia: a new solution for an old problem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1