Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program最新文献

The care of the multiple myeloma (MM) patient is complex, with most patients requiring multiple lines of therapy over a span of many years to decades. Since the days when autologous stem cell transplantation became the standard of care for a large subset of patients, it was imperative that community practices and specialized academic centers work together to optimize the initial care of patients. Now, with the unprecedented number of treatment options and the introduction of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies and bispecific T-cell engagers, that collaboration has become even more important and stretches from the upfront treatment to the relapsed and refractory disease setting. I will discuss the unique safety profile and logistical aspects that pose challenges and opportunities for the safe and successful delivery of these therapies. Close interaction, communication, and established partnerships between the primary oncologist, the myeloma specialist, and the transplant or immune effector cell provider will be required to provide the optimal care longitudinally for each patient. This multidisciplinary approach to treating MM can serve as a paradigm for blending community and academic care.

Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) is included in the group of myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms by the International Consensus Classification and has been renamed as MDS/MPN with neutrophilia by the fifth edition of World Health Organization classification. It is always characterized by morphologic identification of granulocytic dysplasia with >10% circulating immature myeloid cells, 2 distinguished features that differentiate this disease among the others. Somatic mutations may help to diagnose but are not specifically pathognomonic of the disease, with the most detected including ASXL1, SETBP1, NRAS, KRAS, SRSF2, and TET2 and with low-frequency CBL, CSF3R, JAK2, and ETNK1. The genomic landscape of aCML has been recently unravelling, revealing that SETBP1 and ETNK1 are usually not ancestral but secondary events associated with disease progression. Unfortunately, until now, no consensus on risk stratification and treatment has been developed: Mayo Clinic prognostic score identified as adverse events age >67 years, hemoglobin level <10  g/dL, and TET2 mutations. Although some possible genetic markers have been identified, allogeneic transplant remains the only curative strategy.

Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare myeloid neoplasm driven by activating mutations in the MAPK pathway, most commonly BRAF-V600E and MAP2K1. It affects children and adults, with a wide spectrum of clinical presentations ranging from self-limited to multisystem (MS) life-threatening forms. LCH is defined by the accumulation of CD1a+/CD207+ cells in different organs, and patients with liver, spleen, or hematopoietic system involvement have a higher risk of mortality. Patients with neurodegeneration (ND) have devastating outcomes and are resistant to systemic therapies. MS-LCH is treated with risk-adapted therapy, but many patients require multiple salvage regimens that are myelosuppressive and expensive. MAPK inhibitors are increasingly being used, but most patients relapse upon discontinuation of therapy. Here, we review the management of central nervous system disease and how novel cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers might predict patients at high risk of ND who could benefit from early MAPK inhibition. Further, we discuss treatment strategies for refractory/relapsed (R/R) LCH, with a focus on MAPK inhibitors' efficacy and challenges (ie, the unknown): long-term toxicity in children, optimal duration, if they are curative, whether it is safe to combine them with chemotherapy, and their high price tag. Lastly, emerging strategies, such as the new panRAF inhibitor (Day 101) in patients with R/R LCH, ERK1/2 or CSF1R inhibition in patients with MEK1/2 inhibitor resistance, and targeting the microenvironment (checkpoint plus MEK inhibition) or senescent cells (mTOR or BCL-XL inhibitors) in R/R patients, are also examined.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) requires the comprehensive evaluation of patients across multiple dimensions. Among the factors considered, comorbidities hold great significance in the pretransplant assessment. As many as 40% of alloHCT recipients will have a high burden of comorbidities in contemporary cohorts. To ensure a standardized evaluation, several comorbidity scores have been developed; however, they exhibit variations in properties and performance. This review examines the strengths and weaknesses associated with these comorbidity scores, critically appraising these models and proposing a framework for their application in considering the alloHCT candidate. Furthermore, we introduce the concept that comorbidities may have specific effects depending on the chosen transplantation approach and outline the findings of key studies that consider the impact of individual comorbidities on alloHCT outcomes. We suggest that a personalized transplantation approach should not rely solely on the overall burden of comorbidities but should also take into account the individual comorbidities themselves, along with other patient, disease, and transplantation-related factors.

Marginal zone lymphomas (MZLs) represent about 7% of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas and include 3 different subtypes-namely, extranodal (EMZL), nodal, and splenic (SMZL). The initial assessment requires specific diagnostic and staging procedures depending on organ-related peculiarities. In particular, although positron emission tomography/computed tomography was not initially recommended, recent data have reassessed its role in the routine staging of MZL, especially when only localized treatment is planned or there is a suspicion of histologic transformation. Recent findings have improved the risk stratification of MZL patients, highlighting the association of early progression after frontline therapy with worse overall survival. A significant fraction of MZL cases may be related to specific bacterial (ie, Helicobacter pylori in gastric EMZL) or viral infections (hepatis C virus), and in the earlier phases of disease, a variable percentage of patients may respond to anti-infective therapy. Involved-site radiotherapy has a central role in the management of localized EMZL not amenable to or not responding to anti-infective therapy. Although rituximab-based treatments (bendamustine- rituximab in advanced EMZL or rituximab monotherapy in SMZL) have demonstrated favorable results, the current therapeutic scenario is predicted to rapidly change as emerging novel agents, especially Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, have demonstrated promising efficacy and safety profiles, leading to their approval in the relapsed setting. Moreover, a large variety of novel agents (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, bispecific antibodies) are being tested in MZL patients with encouraging preliminary results.

Numerous genetic discoveries and the advent of clinical telomere length testing have led to the recognition of a spectrum of telomere biology disorders (TBDs) beyond the classic dyskeratosis congenita (DC) triad of nail dysplasia, abnormal skin pigmentation, and oral leukoplakia occurring with pediatric bone marrow failure. Patients with DC/TBDs have very short telomeres for their age and are at high risk of bone marrow failure, cancer, pulmonary fibrosis (PF), pulmonary arteriovenous malformations, liver disease, stenosis of the urethra, esophagus, and/or lacrimal ducts, avascular necrosis of the hips and/or shoulders, and other medical problems. However, many patients with TBDs do not develop classic DC features; they may present in middle age and/or with just 1 feature, such as PF or aplastic anemia. TBD-associated clinical manifestations are progressive and attributed to aberrant telomere biology caused by the X-linked recessive, autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, or de novo occurrence of pathogenic germline variants in at least 18 different genes. This review describes the genetics and clinical manifestations of TBDs and highlights areas in need of additional clinical and basic science research.

Abnormal bleeding in patients with liver disease may result from elevated portal pressure and varix formation, reduced hepatic synthesis of coagulation proteins, qualitative platelet dysfunction, and/or thrombocytopenia. Major mechanisms of thrombocytopenia in liver disease include splenic sequestration and impaired platelet production due to reduced thrombopoietin production. Alcohol and certain viruses may induce marrow suppression. Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) may co-occur in patients with liver disease, particularly those with autoimmune liver disease or chronic hepatitis C. Drugs used for the treatment of liver disease or its complications, such as interferon, immunosuppressants, and antibiotics, may cause thrombocytopenia. Periprocedural management of thrombocytopenia of liver disease depends on both individual patient characteristics and the bleeding risk of the procedure. Patients with a platelet count higher than or equal to 50 000/µL and those requiring low-risk procedures rarely require platelet-directed therapy. For those with a platelet count below 50 000/µL who require a high-risk procedure, platelet-directed therapy should be considered, especially if the patient has other risk factors for bleeding, such as abnormal bleeding with past hemostatic challenges. We often target a platelet count higher than or equal to 50 000/µL in such patients. If the procedure is elective, we prefer treatment with a thrombopoietin receptor agonist; if it is urgent, we use platelet transfusion. In high-risk patients who have an inadequate response to or are otherwise unable to receive these therapies, other strategies may be considered, such as a trial of empiric ITP therapy, spleen-directed therapy, or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement.

Severe congenital neutropenias (SCNs) are rare diseases, and to date about 30 subtypes have been described according to their genetic causes. Standard care aims to prevent infections and limit the risk of leukemic transformation; however, several subtypes may have additional organ dysfunction(s), requiring specialized care. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are now the bedrock of standard care. Better understanding of SCN mechanisms now offers the possibility of adapted therapy for some entities. An inhibitor of sodium glucose cotransporter, an antidiabetic drug, may attenuate glycogen storage disease type Ib and glucose-6-phosphatase catalytic subunit 3 neutropenias by clearing 1,5-anhydroglucitol, the precursor of the phosphate ester responsible for these SCNs. Chemokine receptor CXCR4 inhibitors contribute to reversing the leukocyte defect in warts, hypoglobulinemia, infections, and myelokathexis syndrome. All these new approaches use oral drugs, which notably improve quality of life. Additionally, improved research into clonal evolution has highlighted some ways to potentially prevent leukemia, such as stimulating somatic genetic rescue, a physiological process that might limit the risk of leukemic transformation.

Long-term survivors of pediatric hematologic malignancies are at elevated risk for neurocognitive impairment. Such impairment manifests in different ways at different times during survivorship, with deficits in processing speed, attention, and memory often appearing before deficits in executive function, intelligence, and academics. Survivors exposed to therapies that directly target the central nervous system (CNS), as is the case in acute lymphoblastic leukemia, may demonstrate subtle deficits during frontline therapy, and these deficits may grow and evolve over time. Survivors who do not receive CNS-directed therapies (eg, Hodgkin lymphoma) are also at elevated risk for neurocognitive impairment, although the influence on brain function is indirect through cancer therapy impact on systemic organ function vital to brain health (eg, cardiopulmonary morbidity). Over the course of the survivor's life span, the presence and impact of neurocognitive deficits will be determined by a complex interaction between premorbid development and environment, cancer therapy and clinical care, and posttreatment recovery and health. The timing and type of these treatment and health events will dictate the approach to screening and monitoring for neurocognitive impairment.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation plays a central role in the management of fit adults with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete morphologic remission (CR1). Advances in both donor selection and transplant technology have both dramatically increased accessibility of transplant and led to significant reductions in transplant-related mortality over the past 2 decades. There has, however, been no concomitant reduction in the risk of disease relapse, which remains the major cause of transplant failure. Pivotal to the design of innovative strategies with the potential to reduce relapse risk is accurate identification of patients at the highest risk of disease recurrence. Multiple retrospective studies have identified an increased risk of disease relapse in patients allografted for AML in CR1 with evidence of pretransplant measurable residual disease (MRD). The prognostic significance of pretransplant MRD has been confirmed recently in prospective analyses. The optimal management of patients with evidence of pretransplant MRD remains a matter of conjecture with regard to 2 key issues. First, should the presence of pretransplant MRD delay a decision to proceed to transplant, allowing time for delivery of additional MRD-directed therapy prior to transplant? Second, to what extent can the intensity of the conditioning regimen or the magnitude of the graft-vs-leukemia effect be manipulated to improve the outcome of such patients?