Barriers to Hepatitis C Virus Care and How Federally Qualified Health Centers Can Improve Patient Access to Treatment.

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastroenterology Research Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.14740/gr1568
David Lam, Robert J Wong, Adla Tessier, Yenice Zapata, Elsie Saldana, Robert G Gish
{"title":"Barriers to Hepatitis C Virus Care and How Federally Qualified Health Centers Can Improve Patient Access to Treatment.","authors":"David Lam,&nbsp;Robert J Wong,&nbsp;Adla Tessier,&nbsp;Yenice Zapata,&nbsp;Elsie Saldana,&nbsp;Robert G Gish","doi":"10.14740/gr1568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the availability of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment, disparities in HCV care and treatment persist for underserved populations due to demographic-based and insurance-based barriers. We aim to examine the effect of barriers on HCV treatment access for a federally qualified health center (FQHC) population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated medical records of adults diagnosed with chronic HCV at an FQHC clinic from 2016 to 2020 with follow-up through 2021. Univariate and bivariate analyses were used to describe the patient population and significant associations between predictors of linkage to HCV care and treatment access. Adjusted multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictors of starting HCV treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 279 total patients with chronic HCV, 162 patients started treatment (58%), 138 patients (50%) completed treatment, and 99 patients (35%) achieved sustained virological response (SVR). Of the total patients, 145 (52%) were seen by their primary care physician (PCP) for their HCV care and treatment, and 134 (48%) were seen by a provider that specializes in management and treatment of HCV (HCV provider). Patients seen by an HCV provider in addition to their PCP were more likely to have had their prior authorization requests for HCV treatment denied by their insurance providers than patients seen only by their PCP for HCV care (30% vs. 14%, P = 0.001). We believe that this discrepancy stems from two issues. One, prior authorizations are reviewed by insurance providers who are not specially trained in HCV management, so the verbiage used perplexes these reviewers, possibly causing them to issue denials. Two, insurance providers often require HCV genotype testing for DAA medication eligibility, and HCV providers order genotype tests for patients only when HCV treatments have failed to cure patients, so this requirement becomes another barrier to DAA medications. Patients who spoke a non-English language, lived in the USA for less than 10 years, and showed inability to pay for treatment had received treatment despite these characteristics being common barriers to HCV treatment. On multivariate regression, factors independently associated with patients starting treatment included prior denial for DAA medication (odds ratio (OR), 8.88; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.22 - 24.6; P < 0.001) and being seen by an HCV provider (OR, 24.8; 95% CI, 11.7 - 52.5; P < 0.001). However, the most significant barrier to HCV treatment access for the FQHC population was eligibility restrictions from insurance providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Demographic-based barriers (e.g., age, race, and income) often impede HCV care and treatment, but insurance-based barriers are the greatest challenge currently that affects treatment outcomes in our study population. Removing these restrictions would, in our opinion, help to increase treatment levels to underserved populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12461,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ad/77/gr-15-343.PMC9822664.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the availability of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment, disparities in HCV care and treatment persist for underserved populations due to demographic-based and insurance-based barriers. We aim to examine the effect of barriers on HCV treatment access for a federally qualified health center (FQHC) population.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated medical records of adults diagnosed with chronic HCV at an FQHC clinic from 2016 to 2020 with follow-up through 2021. Univariate and bivariate analyses were used to describe the patient population and significant associations between predictors of linkage to HCV care and treatment access. Adjusted multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictors of starting HCV treatment.

Results: Of 279 total patients with chronic HCV, 162 patients started treatment (58%), 138 patients (50%) completed treatment, and 99 patients (35%) achieved sustained virological response (SVR). Of the total patients, 145 (52%) were seen by their primary care physician (PCP) for their HCV care and treatment, and 134 (48%) were seen by a provider that specializes in management and treatment of HCV (HCV provider). Patients seen by an HCV provider in addition to their PCP were more likely to have had their prior authorization requests for HCV treatment denied by their insurance providers than patients seen only by their PCP for HCV care (30% vs. 14%, P = 0.001). We believe that this discrepancy stems from two issues. One, prior authorizations are reviewed by insurance providers who are not specially trained in HCV management, so the verbiage used perplexes these reviewers, possibly causing them to issue denials. Two, insurance providers often require HCV genotype testing for DAA medication eligibility, and HCV providers order genotype tests for patients only when HCV treatments have failed to cure patients, so this requirement becomes another barrier to DAA medications. Patients who spoke a non-English language, lived in the USA for less than 10 years, and showed inability to pay for treatment had received treatment despite these characteristics being common barriers to HCV treatment. On multivariate regression, factors independently associated with patients starting treatment included prior denial for DAA medication (odds ratio (OR), 8.88; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.22 - 24.6; P < 0.001) and being seen by an HCV provider (OR, 24.8; 95% CI, 11.7 - 52.5; P < 0.001). However, the most significant barrier to HCV treatment access for the FQHC population was eligibility restrictions from insurance providers.

Conclusions: Demographic-based barriers (e.g., age, race, and income) often impede HCV care and treatment, but insurance-based barriers are the greatest challenge currently that affects treatment outcomes in our study population. Removing these restrictions would, in our opinion, help to increase treatment levels to underserved populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丙型肝炎病毒治疗的障碍以及联邦合格医疗中心如何改善患者获得治疗的机会。
背景:尽管直接作用抗病毒药物(DAAs)可用于治疗丙型肝炎病毒(HCV),但由于人口和保险方面的障碍,在服务不足的人群中,丙型肝炎病毒的护理和治疗仍然存在差异。我们的目的是检查障碍对联邦合格健康中心(FQHC)人群HCV治疗可及性的影响。方法:回顾性评估2016年至2020年FQHC诊所诊断为慢性HCV的成人病历,随访至2021年。单变量和双变量分析用于描述患者群体以及与HCV护理和治疗可及性相关的预测因子之间的显著关联。采用调整后的多变量logistic回归分析来确定开始HCV治疗的预测因素。结果:279例慢性HCV患者中,162例患者开始治疗(58%),138例患者(50%)完成治疗,99例患者(35%)获得持续病毒学应答(SVR)。在所有患者中,145名(52%)患者接受了初级保健医生(PCP)的HCV护理和治疗,134名(48%)患者接受了专门从事HCV管理和治疗的提供者(HCV提供者)的治疗。与仅接受PCP治疗的HCV患者相比,接受PCP治疗的HCV患者更有可能被保险提供者拒绝其事先授权的HCV治疗请求(30%比14%,P = 0.001)。我们认为,这种差异源于两个问题。首先,事先的授权是由没有经过HCV管理专门培训的保险提供商审查的,因此使用的措辞使这些审查员感到困惑,可能导致他们发布拒绝。第二,保险公司通常要求进行HCV基因型检测以确定DAA的用药资格,而只有当HCV治疗无法治愈患者时,HCV供应商才会对患者进行基因型检测,因此这一要求成为DAA药物的另一个障碍。尽管这些特征是HCV治疗的常见障碍,但讲非英语语言、在美国居住不到10年、表现出无力支付治疗费用的患者仍接受了治疗。在多变量回归中,与患者开始治疗独立相关的因素包括先前拒绝使用DAA药物(优势比(OR), 8.88;95%置信区间(CI), 3.22 ~ 24.6;P < 0.001)和被HCV提供者看到(OR, 24.8;95% ci, 11.7 - 52.5;P < 0.001)。然而,FQHC人群获得HCV治疗的最大障碍是保险提供商的资格限制。结论:基于人口统计学的障碍(如年龄、种族和收入)经常阻碍HCV的护理和治疗,但基于保险的障碍是目前影响我们研究人群治疗结果的最大挑战。我们认为,取消这些限制将有助于提高对服务不足人口的治疗水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gastroenterology Research
Gastroenterology Research GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Adult-Onset Autoimmune Enteropathy Mimicking Disaccharidase Deficiency. Effect of Pemafibrate on the Lipid Profile, Liver Function, and Liver Fibrosis Among Patients With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease. Extraction Basket Entangled in Surgical Sutures in Common Bile Duct Forty-Five Years After Hepatobiliary Surgery: A Bizarre Adverse Event of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography. Pre-Cut Papillotomy Versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Rendezvous for Difficult Biliary Cannulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clinical Efficacy of Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined With Percutaneous Microwave Coagulation Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1