Machine learning-based approach reveals essential features for simplified TSPO PET quantification in ischemic stroke patients

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.11.008
Artem Zatcepin , Anna Kopczak , Adrien Holzgreve , Sandra Hein , Andreas Schindler , Marco Duering , Lena Kaiser , Simon Lindner , Martin Schidlowski , Peter Bartenstein , Nathalie Albert , Matthias Brendel , Sibylle I. Ziegler
{"title":"Machine learning-based approach reveals essential features for simplified TSPO PET quantification in ischemic stroke patients","authors":"Artem Zatcepin ,&nbsp;Anna Kopczak ,&nbsp;Adrien Holzgreve ,&nbsp;Sandra Hein ,&nbsp;Andreas Schindler ,&nbsp;Marco Duering ,&nbsp;Lena Kaiser ,&nbsp;Simon Lindner ,&nbsp;Martin Schidlowski ,&nbsp;Peter Bartenstein ,&nbsp;Nathalie Albert ,&nbsp;Matthias Brendel ,&nbsp;Sibylle I. Ziegler","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.11.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Neuroinflammation evaluation after acute ischemic stroke is a promising option for selecting an appropriate post-stroke treatment strategy. To assess neuroinflammation <em>in vivo</em>, translocator protein PET (TSPO PET) can be used. However, the gold standard TSPO PET quantification method includes a 90 min scan and continuous arterial blood sampling, which is challenging to perform on a routine basis. In this work, we determine what information is required for a simplified quantification approach using a machine learning algorithm.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>We analyzed data from 18 patients with ischemic stroke who received 0–90 min [<sup>18</sup>F]GE-180 PET as well as T1-weigted (T1w), FLAIR, and arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI scans. During PET scans, five manual venous blood samples at 5, 15, 30, 60, and 85 min post injection (p.i.) were drawn, and plasma activity concentration was measured. Total distribution volume (V<sub>T</sub>) was calculated using Logan plot with the full dynamic PET and an image-derived input function (IDIF) from the carotid arteries. IDIF was scaled by a calibration factor derived from all the measured plasma activity concentrations. The calculated V<sub>T</sub> values were used for training a random forest regressor. As input features for the model, we used three late PET frames (60–70, 70–80, and 80–90 min p.i.), the ASL image reflecting perfusion, the voxel coordinates, the lesion mask, and the five plasma activity concentrations. The algorithm was validated with the leave-one-out approach. To estimate the impact of the individual features on the algorithm’s performance, we used Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). Having determined that the three late PET frames and the plasma activity concentrations were the most important features, we tested a simplified quantification approach consisting of dividing a late PET frame by a plasma activity concentration. All the combinations of frames/samples were compared by means of concordance correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plots.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>When using all the input features, the algorithm predicted V<sub>T</sub> values with high accuracy (87.8 ± 8.3%) for both lesion and non-lesion voxels. The SHAP values demonstrated high impact of the late PET frames (60–70, 70–80, and 80–90 min p.i.) and plasma activity concentrations on the V<sub>T</sub> prediction, while the influence of the ASL-derived perfusion, voxel coordinates, and the lesion mask was low. Among all the combinations of the late PET frames and plasma activity concentrations, the 70–80 min p.i. frame divided by the 30 min p.i. plasma sample produced the closest V<sub>T</sub> estimate in the ischemic lesion.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Reliable TSPO PET quantification is achievable by using a single late PET frame divided by a late blood sample activity concentration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":"34 2","pages":"Pages 218-230"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922001283/pdfft?md5=f1499fef4d918f1109e5e15fcbad1787&pid=1-s2.0-S0939388922001283-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922001283","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Neuroinflammation evaluation after acute ischemic stroke is a promising option for selecting an appropriate post-stroke treatment strategy. To assess neuroinflammation in vivo, translocator protein PET (TSPO PET) can be used. However, the gold standard TSPO PET quantification method includes a 90 min scan and continuous arterial blood sampling, which is challenging to perform on a routine basis. In this work, we determine what information is required for a simplified quantification approach using a machine learning algorithm.

Materials and Methods

We analyzed data from 18 patients with ischemic stroke who received 0–90 min [18F]GE-180 PET as well as T1-weigted (T1w), FLAIR, and arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI scans. During PET scans, five manual venous blood samples at 5, 15, 30, 60, and 85 min post injection (p.i.) were drawn, and plasma activity concentration was measured. Total distribution volume (VT) was calculated using Logan plot with the full dynamic PET and an image-derived input function (IDIF) from the carotid arteries. IDIF was scaled by a calibration factor derived from all the measured plasma activity concentrations. The calculated VT values were used for training a random forest regressor. As input features for the model, we used three late PET frames (60–70, 70–80, and 80–90 min p.i.), the ASL image reflecting perfusion, the voxel coordinates, the lesion mask, and the five plasma activity concentrations. The algorithm was validated with the leave-one-out approach. To estimate the impact of the individual features on the algorithm’s performance, we used Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). Having determined that the three late PET frames and the plasma activity concentrations were the most important features, we tested a simplified quantification approach consisting of dividing a late PET frame by a plasma activity concentration. All the combinations of frames/samples were compared by means of concordance correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plots.

Results

When using all the input features, the algorithm predicted VT values with high accuracy (87.8 ± 8.3%) for both lesion and non-lesion voxels. The SHAP values demonstrated high impact of the late PET frames (60–70, 70–80, and 80–90 min p.i.) and plasma activity concentrations on the VT prediction, while the influence of the ASL-derived perfusion, voxel coordinates, and the lesion mask was low. Among all the combinations of the late PET frames and plasma activity concentrations, the 70–80 min p.i. frame divided by the 30 min p.i. plasma sample produced the closest VT estimate in the ischemic lesion.

Conclusion

Reliable TSPO PET quantification is achievable by using a single late PET frame divided by a late blood sample activity concentration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习的方法揭示了简化缺血性中风患者 TSPO PET 定量的基本特征。
简介急性缺血性中风后的神经炎症评估是选择适当的中风后治疗策略的一个很有前景的选择。要评估体内的神经炎症,可以使用转运蛋白 PET(TSPO PET)。然而,金标准 TSPO PET 定量方法包括 90 分钟扫描和连续动脉血采样,这对常规操作具有挑战性。在这项工作中,我们利用机器学习算法确定了简化量化方法所需的信息:我们分析了 18 位缺血性中风患者的数据,这些患者接受了 0-90 分钟[18F]GE-180 PET 以及 T1 权衡 (T1w)、FLAIR 和动脉自旋标记 (ASL) MRI 扫描。在 PET 扫描期间,分别在注射后 5、15、30、60 和 85 分钟(p.i.)手动抽取五份静脉血样本,并测量血浆活性浓度。总分布容积(VT)是通过全动态 PET Logan 图和颈动脉图像输入函数(IDIF)计算得出的。IDIF 根据所有测量的血浆活性浓度得出的校准因子进行缩放。计算出的 VT 值用于训练随机森林回归器。作为模型的输入特征,我们使用了三个晚期 PET 帧(60-70、70-80 和 80-90 分钟 p.i.)、反映灌注的 ASL 图像、体素坐标、病灶掩膜和五个血浆活性浓度。该算法通过 "留一弃一 "方法进行了验证。为了估计各个特征对算法性能的影响,我们使用了夏普利相加解释(SHAP)。在确定三个晚期 PET 帧和血浆活性浓度是最重要的特征后,我们测试了一种简化的量化方法,即用晚期 PET 帧除以血浆活性浓度。我们通过一致性相关系数和布兰-阿尔特曼图对所有帧/样本组合进行了比较:结果:当使用所有输入特征时,该算法预测病变和非病变体素的 VT 值的准确率都很高(87.8 ± 8.3%)。SHAP值显示晚期PET帧(60-70、70-80和80-90分钟p.i.)和血浆活性浓度对VT预测的影响较大,而ASL衍生灌注、体素坐标和病变掩膜的影响较小。在PET晚期帧和血浆活动浓度的所有组合中,70-80分钟p.i.帧除以30分钟p.i.血浆样本得出的缺血性病变VT估计值最接近:结论:通过使用单个晚期 PET 帧除以晚期血样活性浓度,可以实现可靠的 TSPO PET 定量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik (Journal of Medical Physics) is an official organ of the German and Austrian Society of Medical Physic and the Swiss Society of Radiobiology and Medical Physics.The Journal is a platform for basic research and practical applications of physical procedures in medical diagnostics and therapy. The articles are reviewed following international standards of peer reviewing. Focuses of the articles are: -Biophysical methods in radiation therapy and nuclear medicine -Dosimetry and radiation protection -Radiological diagnostics and quality assurance -Modern imaging techniques, such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography -Ultrasonography diagnostics, application of laser and UV rays -Electronic processing of biosignals -Artificial intelligence and machine learning in medical physics In the Journal, the latest scientific insights find their expression in the form of original articles, reviews, technical communications, and information for the clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents Source-detector trajectory optimization for CBCT metal artifact reduction based on PICCS reconstruction Reduction of patient specific quality assurance through plan complexity metrics for VMAT plans with an open-source TPS script Post-mastectomy radiotherapy: Impact of bolus thickness and irradiation technique on skin dose
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1