Internet use and cohort change in social connectedness among older adults

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 Medicine Advances in Life Course Research Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.alcr.2022.100514
Shannon Ang
{"title":"Internet use and cohort change in social connectedness among older adults","authors":"Shannon Ang","doi":"10.1016/j.alcr.2022.100514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Social connections are an integral part of living in society, and trends in social connectedness are thus closely scrutinized. The phenomenon of networked individualism argues that densely knit communities organized around formal social groups such as households and workplaces are becoming less common. Due to advances in technology, individuals are able to develop personalized communities that are more diverse and less geographically-bound. The objective of this study was to determine how both average levels and the variability of social connectedness have changed across cohorts, and how much of this is due to increased internet use. Data from 2006, 2008, 2016, and 2018 waves of the Health and Retirement Study were used to investigate cohort changes in various indicators of social connectedness. The analytical sample consisted of older adults aged 58–69 from the Silent Generation (born 1920–1947) and Baby </span>Boomers (born 1948–1965). Heteroscedastic regression models and </span>decomposition methods were used to investigate the role of increased internet use in driving some of these changes. Findings suggest that increases in internet use was associated with increases in the variance of social participation (i.e., contact with friends and family) in the United States. However, evidence around more subjective measures of social connectedness (i.e., social support, loneliness) was less clear. Future research should seek to understand how cohort change in technological use may affect objective and subjective aspects of social connectedness in different ways.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47126,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Life Course Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Life Course Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040260822000545","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Social connections are an integral part of living in society, and trends in social connectedness are thus closely scrutinized. The phenomenon of networked individualism argues that densely knit communities organized around formal social groups such as households and workplaces are becoming less common. Due to advances in technology, individuals are able to develop personalized communities that are more diverse and less geographically-bound. The objective of this study was to determine how both average levels and the variability of social connectedness have changed across cohorts, and how much of this is due to increased internet use. Data from 2006, 2008, 2016, and 2018 waves of the Health and Retirement Study were used to investigate cohort changes in various indicators of social connectedness. The analytical sample consisted of older adults aged 58–69 from the Silent Generation (born 1920–1947) and Baby Boomers (born 1948–1965). Heteroscedastic regression models and decomposition methods were used to investigate the role of increased internet use in driving some of these changes. Findings suggest that increases in internet use was associated with increases in the variance of social participation (i.e., contact with friends and family) in the United States. However, evidence around more subjective measures of social connectedness (i.e., social support, loneliness) was less clear. Future research should seek to understand how cohort change in technological use may affect objective and subjective aspects of social connectedness in different ways.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
互联网使用和老年人社会联系的群体变化
社会联系是社会生活的一个组成部分,因此社会联系的趋势受到密切关注。网络个人主义现象认为,围绕正式社会团体(如家庭和工作场所)组织起来的紧密联系的社区正变得越来越不常见。由于技术的进步,个人能够发展更多样化和更少地域限制的个性化社区。这项研究的目的是确定社会联系的平均水平和可变性在人群中是如何变化的,以及这在多大程度上是由于互联网使用的增加。研究人员使用了2006年、2008年、2016年和2018年健康与退休研究的数据,调查了社会联系各指标的队列变化。分析样本包括58-69岁的老年人,他们来自沉默的一代(生于1920-1947年)和婴儿潮一代(生于1948-1965年)。使用异方差回归模型和分解方法来调查互联网使用增加在推动这些变化中的作用。研究结果表明,在美国,互联网使用的增加与社会参与(即与朋友和家人的联系)差异的增加有关。然而,关于社会联系的更主观的衡量标准(即社会支持,孤独感)的证据不太清楚。未来的研究应设法了解技术使用的群体变化如何以不同的方式影响社会联系的客观和主观方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Life Course Research
Advances in Life Course Research SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Advances in Life Course Research publishes articles dealing with various aspects of the human life course. Seeing life course research as an essentially interdisciplinary field of study, it invites and welcomes contributions from anthropology, biosocial science, demography, epidemiology and statistics, gerontology, economics, management and organisation science, policy studies, psychology, research methodology and sociology. Original empirical analyses, theoretical contributions, methodological studies and reviews accessible to a broad set of readers are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Childhood poverty trajectories and trajectories of healthcare contacts in adolescence and young adulthood Complex nexus: Economic development, rural-to-urban migration, and transition to adulthood in China Editorial Board How the size and structure of egocentric networks change during a life transition The long-term consequences of school suspension and expulsion on depressive symptoms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1