Haley Hayashi, Michelle Gravier, Kristen Gustavson, Ellen Bernstein-Ellis
{"title":"Perspectives of U.S. speech-language pathologists on supporting the psychosocial health of individuals with aphasia","authors":"Haley Hayashi, Michelle Gravier, Kristen Gustavson, Ellen Bernstein-Ellis","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2023.106365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Individuals living with aphasia (IWA) are more likely than stroke survivors without aphasia to experience depression, anxiety, stress, and social isolation due to communication difficulties, social and life barriers, and neurobiological changes (Hilari, 2011). Researchers in the U.K., Australia, and elsewhere have surveyed speech-language pathologists (SLPs) to ascertain their training and confidence in addressing the psychosocial well-being of IWA (Northcott et al., 2017; Sekhon et al., 2015). To date, no similar survey has been performed in the U.S. The aim of this study was to survey the perspectives of U.S. SLPs on addressing the psychosocial well-being of IWA.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The survey questions were drawn from Northcott et al. (2017), with adjustments for a U.S. audience and additional questions. We conducted a Qualtrics survey which remained open from November 2021 through May 2022 and collected 101 responses. Responses to the closed questions were analyzed using descriptive statistics and open-ended responses were analyzed with qualitative content analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Some of the most significant findings of this survey include the low levels of confidence in addressing psychological health, lack of training among SLPs, and rarity of successful collaboration with mental health professionals. In comparison to surveys conducted in other countries, many overarching themes were similar, but there was some variation in specific responses and patterns. Categories emerging from the open-ended responses included the need for more trained mental health professionals, improved collaboration, and emphasis on the importance of the topic.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This research highlights the necessity of increased training, as well as improved interprofessional collaboration between SLPs and mental health professionals. Limitations of the study include the potential bias of respondents, as well as the number and scope of the questions and responses. Future studies can employ interviews, trial models for collaboration, and partner with IWA to explore their experiences with psychosocial health support and services.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 106365"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021992423000655","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Introduction
Individuals living with aphasia (IWA) are more likely than stroke survivors without aphasia to experience depression, anxiety, stress, and social isolation due to communication difficulties, social and life barriers, and neurobiological changes (Hilari, 2011). Researchers in the U.K., Australia, and elsewhere have surveyed speech-language pathologists (SLPs) to ascertain their training and confidence in addressing the psychosocial well-being of IWA (Northcott et al., 2017; Sekhon et al., 2015). To date, no similar survey has been performed in the U.S. The aim of this study was to survey the perspectives of U.S. SLPs on addressing the psychosocial well-being of IWA.
Methods
The survey questions were drawn from Northcott et al. (2017), with adjustments for a U.S. audience and additional questions. We conducted a Qualtrics survey which remained open from November 2021 through May 2022 and collected 101 responses. Responses to the closed questions were analyzed using descriptive statistics and open-ended responses were analyzed with qualitative content analysis.
Results
Some of the most significant findings of this survey include the low levels of confidence in addressing psychological health, lack of training among SLPs, and rarity of successful collaboration with mental health professionals. In comparison to surveys conducted in other countries, many overarching themes were similar, but there was some variation in specific responses and patterns. Categories emerging from the open-ended responses included the need for more trained mental health professionals, improved collaboration, and emphasis on the importance of the topic.
Conclusions
This research highlights the necessity of increased training, as well as improved interprofessional collaboration between SLPs and mental health professionals. Limitations of the study include the potential bias of respondents, as well as the number and scope of the questions and responses. Future studies can employ interviews, trial models for collaboration, and partner with IWA to explore their experiences with psychosocial health support and services.
由于沟通困难、社会和生活障碍以及神经生物学变化,失语症患者比没有失语症的中风幸存者更有可能经历抑郁、焦虑、压力和社会孤立(Hilari, 2011)。英国、澳大利亚和其他地方的研究人员对言语语言病理学家(slp)进行了调查,以确定他们在解决IWA的社会心理健康方面的训练和信心(Northcott等人,2017;Sekhon et al., 2015)。到目前为止,在美国还没有进行过类似的调查。本研究的目的是调查美国slp在解决IWA心理社会健康方面的观点。调查问题来自Northcott等人(2017),并针对美国受众和其他问题进行了调整。我们从2021年11月到2022年5月进行了一项质量调查,收集了101份回复。对封闭式问题的回答采用描述性统计分析,开放式问题的回答采用定性内容分析分析。结果本调查的一些最重要的发现包括解决心理健康问题的信心水平低,slp缺乏培训,以及与心理健康专业人员成功合作的罕见。与在其他国家进行的调查相比,许多总体主题是相似的,但在具体答复和模式方面有一些差异。从开放式答复中产生的类别包括需要更多训练有素的精神卫生专业人员、改进协作以及强调该专题的重要性。结论:本研究强调了加强培训的必要性,以及改善精神卫生专业人员与精神卫生专业人员之间的跨专业合作。该研究的局限性包括受访者的潜在偏见,以及问题和回答的数量和范围。未来的研究可以采用访谈、合作试验模型,并与IWA合作,探索他们在社会心理健康支持和服务方面的经验。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Communication Disorders publishes original articles on topics related to disorders of speech, language and hearing. Authors are encouraged to submit reports of experimental or descriptive investigations (research articles), review articles, tutorials or discussion papers, or letters to the editor ("short communications"). Please note that we do not accept case studies unless they conform to the principles of single-subject experimental design. Special issues are published periodically on timely and clinically relevant topics.