A general health economics review of the hidden costs involved in discharging coeliac patients from hospital-based specialty clinics to community-based management.

Olivia Greenham, Luke Johnson, Matthew Johnson
{"title":"A general health economics review of the hidden costs involved in discharging coeliac patients from hospital-based specialty clinics to community-based management.","authors":"Olivia Greenham,&nbsp;Luke Johnson,&nbsp;Matthew Johnson","doi":"10.22037/ghfbb.v16i2.2715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this work was to highlight the impact and hidden costs incurred by the NHS in supporting this management process.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Coeliac disease (CD) is a common auto-immune condition which affects around 1% of the general population. In 2005 there was a drive by the government to discharge patients with CD from specialist hospital follow up to community-based management to improve cost efficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 1317 CD patients collected from a local coeliac database created between 2005 and 2016.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During these 12 years, CD patients accounted for 1965 hospital admissions with a total 5716 days spent within the hospital setting. There were 33150 adult and paediatric OPAs attended equating to 25.17 per coeliac patient, or 2.29 per person per year. The cost to the CCG totalled £5,167,396. A total of 527 lower GI procedures were undertaken with findings of microscopic colitis, melanosis coli, inflammatory bowel disease and colon cancer. 420 (29%) of the coeliac cohort were found to have IDA with just 4% (17/420) receiving an intravenous (IV) iron infusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It would appear that the government's attempts to reduce the cost of CD care within the NHS was not particularly effective, from a financial, or patient care perspective. A hospital-based, specialist nurse led, virtual management system (with consultant over-view) may prove to be a more efficient compromise, to help reduce down waiting times and costs, whilst still providing coeliac patients with the specialist and holistic input they require and deserve.</p>","PeriodicalId":12636,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench","volume":"16 2","pages":"173-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/45/a6/GHFBB-16-173.PMC10404825.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/ghfbb.v16i2.2715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this work was to highlight the impact and hidden costs incurred by the NHS in supporting this management process.

Background: Coeliac disease (CD) is a common auto-immune condition which affects around 1% of the general population. In 2005 there was a drive by the government to discharge patients with CD from specialist hospital follow up to community-based management to improve cost efficiency.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 1317 CD patients collected from a local coeliac database created between 2005 and 2016.

Results: During these 12 years, CD patients accounted for 1965 hospital admissions with a total 5716 days spent within the hospital setting. There were 33150 adult and paediatric OPAs attended equating to 25.17 per coeliac patient, or 2.29 per person per year. The cost to the CCG totalled £5,167,396. A total of 527 lower GI procedures were undertaken with findings of microscopic colitis, melanosis coli, inflammatory bowel disease and colon cancer. 420 (29%) of the coeliac cohort were found to have IDA with just 4% (17/420) receiving an intravenous (IV) iron infusion.

Conclusion: It would appear that the government's attempts to reduce the cost of CD care within the NHS was not particularly effective, from a financial, or patient care perspective. A hospital-based, specialist nurse led, virtual management system (with consultant over-view) may prove to be a more efficient compromise, to help reduce down waiting times and costs, whilst still providing coeliac patients with the specialist and holistic input they require and deserve.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一般卫生经济学回顾涉及将乳糜泻患者从医院为基础的专科诊所转移到社区管理的隐性成本。
目的:这项工作的目的是强调在支持这一管理过程中NHS所产生的影响和隐藏成本。背景:乳糜泻(CD)是一种常见的自身免疫性疾病,约占总人口的1%。2005年,政府推动乳糜泻患者从专科医院出院,接受社区管理,以提高成本效益。方法:回顾性分析从2005年至2016年建立的当地乳糜泻数据库中收集的1317例乳糜泻患者。结果:在这12年中,有1965例乳糜泻患者住院,总共住院5716天。共有33150名成人和儿科opa参加,相当于每名乳糜泻患者25.17名,或每人每年2.29名。CCG的总费用为5,167,396英镑。共有527例下消化道手术发现显微镜下结肠炎、大肠黑素病、炎症性肠病和结肠癌。在乳糜泻队列中,有420人(29%)被发现患有IDA,只有4%(17/420)接受了静脉(IV)铁输注。结论:从财政或患者护理的角度来看,政府试图在NHS内降低乳糜泻治疗成本的努力似乎并不是特别有效。一个以医院为基础,由专科护士领导的虚拟管理系统(有咨询师总览)可能被证明是一个更有效的折衷方案,有助于减少等待时间和成本,同时仍然为乳糜泻患者提供他们需要和应该得到的专科和整体输入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Posterior tibial nerve electrical stimulation in chronic constipation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Small fiber neuropathy in irritable bowel syndrome. Biguanides and glucagon like peptide 1 receptor agonists in the amelioration of post liver transplant weight gain; a scoping review of the mechanism of action, safety and efficacy. Design and development of a self-care application for patients with liver cirrhosis. Evaluation strategy of anti-mitochondrial antibodies M2-negative: the role of multiplex rodent tissues and related clinical implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1