Live-streaming Activity and Relaxation Breaks: a (Home-)Office-Compatible Approach to Promote Break Recovery, Mood, and Attention?

IF 1.6 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Occupational Health Science Pub Date : 2023-01-12 DOI:10.1007/s41542-022-00141-9
Elisabeth Maria Riedl, Annabel Müller, Johanna Perzl, Joachim Thomas
{"title":"Live-streaming Activity and Relaxation Breaks: a (Home-)Office-Compatible Approach to Promote Break Recovery, Mood, and Attention?","authors":"Elisabeth Maria Riedl, Annabel Müller, Johanna Perzl, Joachim Thomas","doi":"10.1007/s41542-022-00141-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study is to investigate whether short, live-streaming activity and relaxation lunch breaks have positive associations with office workers' mood (calmness, valence, and energetic arousal), back pain, and attention after break and whether these associations are mediated by better break recovery. Additionally, we considered the two respite interventions as resources possibly buffering the effects of elevated situational job demands. Ten-minute break exercises were conducted during lunch breaks via Zoom live-stream, and data on those days were compared with data on days on which participants spent their breaks as usual. Our sample of 34 office workers provided data for 277 work days (209 in the home office and 68 on site at the company). Multilevel path models revealed positive total associations of both respite interventions with the mood dimension of calmness. Activity breaks additionally showed a positive association with the energetic arousal dimension of mood, while relaxation breaks were positively related to objectively measured cognitive performance. Interestingly, activity breaks moderated the relationships of job demands with calmness and valence, indicating their function as a stress-buffering resource. There were no significant associations between the two respite interventions and back pain. Supplemented by participants' feedback, the findings of this study suggest that offering short virtually guided break exercises may represent a feasible and office-compatible approach to promote break recovery, mood and functionality at work, especially regarding home-office work. Possible advantages and disadvantages of the live-streaming format are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":29938,"journal":{"name":"Occupational Health Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9834677/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-022-00141-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate whether short, live-streaming activity and relaxation lunch breaks have positive associations with office workers' mood (calmness, valence, and energetic arousal), back pain, and attention after break and whether these associations are mediated by better break recovery. Additionally, we considered the two respite interventions as resources possibly buffering the effects of elevated situational job demands. Ten-minute break exercises were conducted during lunch breaks via Zoom live-stream, and data on those days were compared with data on days on which participants spent their breaks as usual. Our sample of 34 office workers provided data for 277 work days (209 in the home office and 68 on site at the company). Multilevel path models revealed positive total associations of both respite interventions with the mood dimension of calmness. Activity breaks additionally showed a positive association with the energetic arousal dimension of mood, while relaxation breaks were positively related to objectively measured cognitive performance. Interestingly, activity breaks moderated the relationships of job demands with calmness and valence, indicating their function as a stress-buffering resource. There were no significant associations between the two respite interventions and back pain. Supplemented by participants' feedback, the findings of this study suggest that offering short virtually guided break exercises may represent a feasible and office-compatible approach to promote break recovery, mood and functionality at work, especially regarding home-office work. Possible advantages and disadvantages of the live-streaming format are discussed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直播活动和放松休息:促进休息恢复、情绪和注意力的(家庭)办公室兼容方法?
本研究的目的是调查短时间的现场直播活动和放松午休是否与上班族的情绪(平静、情绪价值和精力唤醒)、背痛和休息后的注意力有积极的联系,以及这些联系是否通过更好的休息恢复来调节。此外,我们还将这两项休息干预措施视为可能缓冲情景工作要求升高影响的资源。在午餐休息时间,我们通过 Zoom 实时流进行了十分钟的休息练习,并将这些休息日的数据与参与者正常休息日的数据进行了比较。我们的样本中有 34 名上班族,他们提供了 277 个工作日的数据(209 个在家庭办公室,68 个在公司现场)。多层次路径模型显示,两种休息干预措施都与平静的情绪维度呈正相关。此外,活动休息时间还与情绪的精力唤醒维度呈正相关,而放松休息时间则与客观测量的认知表现呈正相关。有趣的是,活动时间调节了工作要求与平静和情绪之间的关系,这表明活动时间具有缓冲压力的功能。两种休息干预措施与背痛之间没有明显关联。根据参与者的反馈,本研究结果表明,提供虚拟指导的短暂休息练习可能是一种可行的、与办公室兼容的方法,可以促进休息恢复、情绪和工作功能,特别是在家庭办公室工作方面。本研究还讨论了直播形式可能存在的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
9.70%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Workplace Substance Use Programs, Policies, and Practices on Current Substance Use Among A National Sample of Low-Income Workers: Differences by Race/Ethnicity and Education Level An Evaluation of Indoor Sex Workers’ Psychosocial Occupational Health and Safety in Metro Vancouver, Canada Office Openess Affects Stress Regulation and Teamwork: A Neurophysiological Field Study Identifying Different Patterns of Citizenship Motives: A Latent Profile Analysis Methodological and Demographic Variation in Estimates of Economic Dependence Across Two Types of Gig Work
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1