Nomograms Based on Non-High-Density Lipoprotein to Predict Outcomes in Patients with Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/TCRM.S389694
Chuang Li, Kuizheng He, Yixing Yang, Kuibao Li, Mulei Chen, Lefeng Wang, Xiaorong Xu, Weiming Li
{"title":"Nomograms Based on Non-High-Density Lipoprotein to Predict Outcomes in Patients with Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.","authors":"Chuang Li,&nbsp;Kuizheng He,&nbsp;Yixing Yang,&nbsp;Kuibao Li,&nbsp;Mulei Chen,&nbsp;Lefeng Wang,&nbsp;Xiaorong Xu,&nbsp;Weiming Li","doi":"10.2147/TCRM.S389694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Non-high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) is a secondary therapeutic target in cardiovascular diseases and is used for residual risk assessment in patients with coronary artery syndrome (ACS). This study was designed to determine the association between non-HDL-C in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) with ACS and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 468 patients with prior CABG with ACS and categorized them into two groups based on the median non-HDL-C level. The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including cardiovascular death and recurrent myocardial infarction. Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox proportional-hazard regressions, and restricted cubic splines were used to determine the association between non-HDL-C and MACEs. The discrimination and reclassification of the nomogram based on non-HDL-C were assessed using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and net reclassification improvement (NRI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the average follow-up time of 744.5 days, non-HDL-C was independently associated with the occurrence of MACEs (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.65-15.24; <i>p</i> = 0.005) after adjusting for other lipid parameters. The spline curves indicated a linear relationship between non-HDL-C and MACEs (p-nonlinear: 0.863). The time-dependent areas under the ROC curves of prior-CABG-ACS nomograms containing non-HDL regarding MACEs in two consecutive years were 91.7 (95% CI: 85.5-97.9) and 91.5 (95% CI: 87.3-95.7), respectively. The NRI analysis indicated that the prior-CABG-ACS model improved the reclassification ability for 1- and 2-year MACEs (22.4% and 7%, <i>p</i> < 0.05, respectively).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Non-HDL is independently associated with the risk of MACEs in patients with prior CABG with ACS. The prior-CABG-ACS nomogram based on non-HDL-C and five convenient variables generates valid and stable predictions of MACE occurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":48769,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","volume":"19 ","pages":"15-26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9e/4d/tcrm-19-15.PMC9830084.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S389694","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Non-high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) is a secondary therapeutic target in cardiovascular diseases and is used for residual risk assessment in patients with coronary artery syndrome (ACS). This study was designed to determine the association between non-HDL-C in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) with ACS and clinical outcomes.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 468 patients with prior CABG with ACS and categorized them into two groups based on the median non-HDL-C level. The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including cardiovascular death and recurrent myocardial infarction. Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox proportional-hazard regressions, and restricted cubic splines were used to determine the association between non-HDL-C and MACEs. The discrimination and reclassification of the nomogram based on non-HDL-C were assessed using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and net reclassification improvement (NRI).

Results: During the average follow-up time of 744.5 days, non-HDL-C was independently associated with the occurrence of MACEs (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.65-15.24; p = 0.005) after adjusting for other lipid parameters. The spline curves indicated a linear relationship between non-HDL-C and MACEs (p-nonlinear: 0.863). The time-dependent areas under the ROC curves of prior-CABG-ACS nomograms containing non-HDL regarding MACEs in two consecutive years were 91.7 (95% CI: 85.5-97.9) and 91.5 (95% CI: 87.3-95.7), respectively. The NRI analysis indicated that the prior-CABG-ACS model improved the reclassification ability for 1- and 2-year MACEs (22.4% and 7%, p < 0.05, respectively).

Discussion: Non-HDL is independently associated with the risk of MACEs in patients with prior CABG with ACS. The prior-CABG-ACS nomogram based on non-HDL-C and five convenient variables generates valid and stable predictions of MACE occurrence.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于非高密度脂蛋白的图预测急性冠脉综合征冠状动脉搭桥术患者预后:一项单中心回顾性研究
简介:非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(non-HDL-C)是心血管疾病的次要治疗靶点,用于冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的剩余风险评估。本研究旨在确定既往冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者的非hdl - c与ACS和临床结果之间的关系。方法:我们回顾性分析468例既往冠脉搭桥合并ACS患者,并根据非hdl - c中位数水平将其分为两组。主要终点是主要不良心血管事件(mace),包括心血管死亡和复发性心肌梗死。Kaplan-Meier曲线、Cox比例风险回归和受限三次样条用于确定非hdl - c与mace之间的关系。采用随时间变化的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和净重分类改善(NRI)评估非hdl - c的nomogram辨析和重分类。结果:平均随访744.5天,非hdl - c与mace的发生独立相关(风险比[HR] = 5.01, 95%可信区间[CI] = 1.65 ~ 15.24;P = 0.005)。样条曲线显示非hdl - c与mace呈线性关系(p-非线性:0.863)。连续两年mace患者术前cabg - acs非hdl曲线下的时间依赖面积分别为91.7 (95% CI: 85.5-97.9)和91.5 (95% CI: 87.3-95.7)。NRI分析显示,先前的cabg - acs模型提高了1年和2年mace的再分类能力(分别为22.4%和7%,p < 0.05)。讨论:非高密度脂蛋白与既往冠脉搭桥合并ACS患者的mace风险独立相关。基于非hdl - c和5个方便变量的prior-CABG-ACS nomogram可对MACE的发生进行有效且稳定的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
139
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management is an international, peer-reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies in all therapeutic areas, outcomes, safety, and programs for the effective, safe, and sustained use of medicines, therapeutic and surgical interventions in all clinical areas. The journal welcomes submissions covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary. The journal will consider case reports but only if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. As of 18th March 2019, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
期刊最新文献
Emerging Treatment Options for Myelofibrosis: Focus on Anemia. Factors Affecting Radial Artery Occlusion After Right Transradial Artery Catheterization for Coronary Intervention and Procedures. Innovations in the Treatment of Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa (DEB): Current Landscape and Prospects. Effect of Tricalcium Phosphate on Healing of Non-Unions: An Observational Study of over 400 Non-Unions. Discontinuation of Antidepressants in Older Adults: A Literature Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1