Protocolized approach saves the limb in peripheral arterial injury: A decade experience

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Chinese Journal of Traumatology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cjtee.2022.12.010
Pratyusha Priyadarshini, Supreet Kaur, Komal Gupta, Abhinav Kumar, Junaid Alam, Dinesh Bagaria, Narender Choudhary, Amit Gupta, Sushma Sagar, Biplab Mishra, Subodh Kumar
{"title":"Protocolized approach saves the limb in peripheral arterial injury: A decade experience","authors":"Pratyusha Priyadarshini,&nbsp;Supreet Kaur,&nbsp;Komal Gupta,&nbsp;Abhinav Kumar,&nbsp;Junaid Alam,&nbsp;Dinesh Bagaria,&nbsp;Narender Choudhary,&nbsp;Amit Gupta,&nbsp;Sushma Sagar,&nbsp;Biplab Mishra,&nbsp;Subodh Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.cjtee.2022.12.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Outcomes of peripheral arterial injury (PAI) depend on various factors, such as warm ischemia time and concomitant injuries. Suboptimal prehospital care may lead to delayed presentation, and a lack of dedicated trauma system may lead to poorer outcome. Also, there are few reports of these outcomes. The study aims to review our experience of PAI management for more than a decade, and identify the predictors of limb loss in these patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained database of trauma admissions at a level I trauma center from January 2008 to December 2019. Patients with acute upper limb arterial injuries or lower limb arterial injuries at or above the level of popliteal artery were included. Association of limb loss with ischemia time, mechanism of injury, and concomitant injuries was studied using multiple logistic regressions. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA version 15.0 (Stata Corp LLC, Texas).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 716 patients with PAI, the majority (91.9%) were young males. Blunt trauma was the most common mechanism of injury. Median ischemia time was 4 h (interquartile range 2–7 h). Brachial artery (28.5%) was the most common injured vessel followed by popliteal artery (17.5%) and femoral artery (17.3%). Limb salvage rate was 78%. Out of them, 158 (22.1%) patients needed amputation, and 53 (7.4%) had undergone primary amputation. The majority (88.6%) of patients who required primary or secondary amputations had blunt trauma. On multivariate analysis, blunt trauma, ischemia time more than 6 h and concomitant venous, skeletal, and soft tissue injuries were associated with higher odds of amputation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Over all limb salvage rates was 77.9% in our series. Blunt mechanism of injury and associated skeletal and soft tissue injury, ischemia time more than 6 h portend a poor prognosis. Injury prevention, robust prehospital care, and rapid referral to specialized trauma center are few efficient measures, which can decrease the morbidity associated with vascular injury.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51555,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Traumatology","volume":"28 1","pages":"Pages 62-68"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127522001407","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Outcomes of peripheral arterial injury (PAI) depend on various factors, such as warm ischemia time and concomitant injuries. Suboptimal prehospital care may lead to delayed presentation, and a lack of dedicated trauma system may lead to poorer outcome. Also, there are few reports of these outcomes. The study aims to review our experience of PAI management for more than a decade, and identify the predictors of limb loss in these patients.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained database of trauma admissions at a level I trauma center from January 2008 to December 2019. Patients with acute upper limb arterial injuries or lower limb arterial injuries at or above the level of popliteal artery were included. Association of limb loss with ischemia time, mechanism of injury, and concomitant injuries was studied using multiple logistic regressions. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA version 15.0 (Stata Corp LLC, Texas).

Results

Out of 716 patients with PAI, the majority (91.9%) were young males. Blunt trauma was the most common mechanism of injury. Median ischemia time was 4 h (interquartile range 2–7 h). Brachial artery (28.5%) was the most common injured vessel followed by popliteal artery (17.5%) and femoral artery (17.3%). Limb salvage rate was 78%. Out of them, 158 (22.1%) patients needed amputation, and 53 (7.4%) had undergone primary amputation. The majority (88.6%) of patients who required primary or secondary amputations had blunt trauma. On multivariate analysis, blunt trauma, ischemia time more than 6 h and concomitant venous, skeletal, and soft tissue injuries were associated with higher odds of amputation.

Conclusion

Over all limb salvage rates was 77.9% in our series. Blunt mechanism of injury and associated skeletal and soft tissue injury, ischemia time more than 6 h portend a poor prognosis. Injury prevention, robust prehospital care, and rapid referral to specialized trauma center are few efficient measures, which can decrease the morbidity associated with vascular injury.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挽救外周动脉损伤肢体的规程化方法:十年经验
目的:外周动脉损伤(PAI)的预后取决于多种因素,如温暖缺血时间和并发损伤。不理想的院前护理可能会导致病情延误,而缺乏专门的创伤系统可能会导致较差的预后。此外,有关这些结果的报道也很少。本研究旨在回顾我们十多年来处理 PAI 的经验,并确定这些患者肢体缺失的预测因素:本研究对一家一级创伤中心自 2008 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间收治的创伤患者的前瞻性数据库进行了回顾性分析。研究对象包括急性上肢动脉损伤或腘动脉水平或以上的下肢动脉损伤患者。采用多重逻辑回归法研究了肢体缺失与缺血时间、损伤机制和伴随损伤的关系。统计分析使用 STATA 15.0 版(Stata Corp LLC,德克萨斯州)进行:在 716 名 PAI 患者中,大多数(92%)为年轻男性。钝性创伤是最常见的损伤机制。缺血时间中位数为 4 小时(四分位间范围为 2-7 小时)。肱动脉(28%)是最常见的受伤血管,其次是腘动脉(18%)和股动脉(17%)。肢体抢救率为 78%。其中,158 名(22%)患者需要截肢,53 名(7%)患者进行了初次截肢。大部分(86%)需要初次或二次截肢的患者都有钝器伤。多变量分析显示,钝器创伤、缺血时间超过6小时以及同时伴有静脉、骨骼和软组织损伤的患者截肢的几率更高:在我们的系列研究中,肢体总抢救率为78%。钝器致伤、伴有骨骼和软组织损伤、缺血时间超过 6 小时预示着预后不良。预防损伤、强有力的院前护理和快速转诊至专业的创伤中心是几项有效的措施,可降低与血管损伤相关的发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1707
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Traumatology (CJT, ISSN 1008-1275) was launched in 1998 and is a peer-reviewed English journal authorized by Chinese Association of Trauma, Chinese Medical Association. It is multidisciplinary and designed to provide the most current and relevant information for both the clinical and basic research in the field of traumatic medicine. CJT primarily publishes expert forums, original papers, case reports and so on. Topics cover trauma system and management, surgical procedures, acute care, rehabilitation, post-traumatic complications, translational medicine, traffic medicine and other related areas. The journal especially emphasizes clinical application, technique, surgical video, guideline, recommendations for more effective surgical approaches.
期刊最新文献
Multidetector computed tomography angiography for diagnosis of traumatic aneurysms associated with penetrating head injuries. Efficacy and safety of conventional biplanar and triangulation method for sacroiliac screw placement in the treatment of unstable posterior pelvic ring fractures: A real-world retrospective cohort study. How does attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder affect driving behavior components? Baseline findings from Persian traffic cohort. Multiomics analysis elucidated the role of inflammatory response and bile acid metabolism disturbance in electric shock-induced liver injury in mice. Protocolized approach saves the limb in peripheral arterial injury: A decade experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1