A Southeast Asian collaborative Delphi consensus on surveying risk factors for head and neck cancer screening and prevention.

Global surgery (London) Pub Date : 2022-01-01
D R Pan, E Juhlin, A N Tran, Q Wei, S Tang, A T Bui, N G Iyer, W T Lee
{"title":"A Southeast Asian collaborative Delphi consensus on surveying risk factors for head and neck cancer screening and prevention.","authors":"D R Pan,&nbsp;E Juhlin,&nbsp;A N Tran,&nbsp;Q Wei,&nbsp;S Tang,&nbsp;A T Bui,&nbsp;N G Iyer,&nbsp;W T Lee","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to determine high value questions for early detection and prevention of head and neck cancer by querying content experts on patient risk factors relevant to local communities in Southeast Asia (i.e., Vietnam, Laos, China, and Singapore). The Delphi method was employed using three rounds of asynchronous surveying which included participants among five different collaborating medical centers. 60 total survey items were assessed for consensus defined by a priori measures on the relative level of value of these questions for use in head and neck cancer screening. 77% of items reached a consensus and no items were concluded to be of low value despite differences in conclusions regarding relative importance. Survey items focused on patient demographic information and physical examination were examined across variables such as expert department affiliation, academic designation, and years of experience and found to be without statistically significant differences. However, with consensus items related to social risk factors, it was determined that participants who had 15 or more years of experience or identified as otolaryngologists rated these items at a relatively lower value than their peers with less experience (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0017) or outside the field of otolaryngology (p = 0.0101). This study explicitly identifies patient variables to consider in head and neck cancer screening that have not previously been comprehensively or methodically assessed in current literature. Increasing awareness of these risk factors may benefit the design and implementation of future head and neck cancer early detection and prevention programs in Southeast Asia and beyond as well as positively impact head and neck cancer outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73175,"journal":{"name":"Global surgery (London)","volume":"8 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9770631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global surgery (London)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine high value questions for early detection and prevention of head and neck cancer by querying content experts on patient risk factors relevant to local communities in Southeast Asia (i.e., Vietnam, Laos, China, and Singapore). The Delphi method was employed using three rounds of asynchronous surveying which included participants among five different collaborating medical centers. 60 total survey items were assessed for consensus defined by a priori measures on the relative level of value of these questions for use in head and neck cancer screening. 77% of items reached a consensus and no items were concluded to be of low value despite differences in conclusions regarding relative importance. Survey items focused on patient demographic information and physical examination were examined across variables such as expert department affiliation, academic designation, and years of experience and found to be without statistically significant differences. However, with consensus items related to social risk factors, it was determined that participants who had 15 or more years of experience or identified as otolaryngologists rated these items at a relatively lower value than their peers with less experience (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0017) or outside the field of otolaryngology (p = 0.0101). This study explicitly identifies patient variables to consider in head and neck cancer screening that have not previously been comprehensively or methodically assessed in current literature. Increasing awareness of these risk factors may benefit the design and implementation of future head and neck cancer early detection and prevention programs in Southeast Asia and beyond as well as positively impact head and neck cancer outcomes.

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
东南亚合作德尔菲共识调查头颈癌筛查和预防的危险因素。
本研究的目的是通过询问东南亚(即越南、老挝、中国和新加坡)当地社区相关患者风险因素的内容专家,确定头颈癌早期发现和预防的高价值问题。采用德尔菲法,在五个不同的合作医疗中心进行了三轮异步调查。对60个调查项目进行评估,以确定这些问题在头颈癌筛查中使用的相对价值水平的先验措施。77%的项目达成共识,尽管在相对重要性方面的结论存在差异,但没有项目被认为是低价值的。关注患者人口统计信息和体格检查的调查项目跨专家部门隶属关系、学术指定和经验年限等变量进行了检查,发现没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,对于与社会风险因素相关的共识项目,确定具有15年或以上经验或被确定为耳鼻喉科医生的参与者对这些项目的评价相对低于经验较少的同龄人(p < 0.0001, p = 0.0017)或耳鼻喉科以外的人(p = 0.0101)。本研究明确确定了头颈癌筛查中需要考虑的患者变量,这些变量在当前文献中尚未得到全面或系统的评估。提高对这些风险因素的认识可能有利于东南亚及其他地区未来头颈癌早期检测和预防项目的设计和实施,并对头颈癌的预后产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Southeast Asian collaborative Delphi consensus on surveying risk factors for head and neck cancer screening and prevention A Southeast Asian collaborative Delphi consensus on surveying risk factors for head and neck cancer screening and prevention. Case series and outcomes of hyperbaric oxygen treatment of acute cerebral gas embolism The impact of delayed acute diverticulitis presentations during the COVID-19 pandemic on acuity and surgical complexity in the long-term Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy: A Quick Guide for Physicians and Surgeons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1