Need to rethink tDCS protocols for the treatment of alcohol use disorder: Insights from a randomized sham-controlled clinical trial among detoxified inpatients.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Journal of Addictive Diseases Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-14 DOI:10.1080/10550887.2023.2257106
Prabhoo Dayal, Gauri S Kaloiya, Rohit Verma, Nand Kumar
{"title":"Need to rethink tDCS protocols for the treatment of alcohol use disorder: Insights from a randomized sham-controlled clinical trial among detoxified inpatients.","authors":"Prabhoo Dayal, Gauri S Kaloiya, Rohit Verma, Nand Kumar","doi":"10.1080/10550887.2023.2257106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a chronic disorder with various health problems. Reduced functioning of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC) is associated with impaired regulation of alcohol-seeking behaviors and increased cravings in individuals with AUD. This study aimed to investigate whether 10 add-on sessions of tDCS, over the left DLPFC in detoxified inpatients with AUD could reduce cravings and increase abstinence rates at three months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Detoxified inpatients with AUD were randomly assigned to either treatment as usual (TAU) plus ten sessions of active tDCS over left DLPFC, or TAU plus ten sessions of sham tDCS treatment twice daily for five consecutive days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results from the generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) revealed that time had a significant effect on OCDS scores, but neither treatment nor interaction between these two factors had a significant effect on OCDS scores The Chi-square test in the intention- to- treat analysis did not show a significant difference in complete abstinence rates between the active treatment group and the sham treatment group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>we found that adding ten sessions of active tDCS over left DLPFC tDCS to the treatment as usual for AUD did not result in improved abstinence rates or reduced craving.</p>","PeriodicalId":47493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"544-550"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2023.2257106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a chronic disorder with various health problems. Reduced functioning of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC) is associated with impaired regulation of alcohol-seeking behaviors and increased cravings in individuals with AUD. This study aimed to investigate whether 10 add-on sessions of tDCS, over the left DLPFC in detoxified inpatients with AUD could reduce cravings and increase abstinence rates at three months.

Methods: Detoxified inpatients with AUD were randomly assigned to either treatment as usual (TAU) plus ten sessions of active tDCS over left DLPFC, or TAU plus ten sessions of sham tDCS treatment twice daily for five consecutive days.

Results: The results from the generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) revealed that time had a significant effect on OCDS scores, but neither treatment nor interaction between these two factors had a significant effect on OCDS scores The Chi-square test in the intention- to- treat analysis did not show a significant difference in complete abstinence rates between the active treatment group and the sham treatment group.

Conclusions: we found that adding ten sessions of active tDCS over left DLPFC tDCS to the treatment as usual for AUD did not result in improved abstinence rates or reduced craving.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
需要重新思考治疗酒精使用障碍的 tDCS 方案:一项针对戒毒住院患者的随机假对照临床试验的启示。
目标:酒精使用障碍(AUD)是一种慢性疾病,会带来各种健康问题。背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)功能减退与AUD患者觅酒行为的调节能力受损和渴求增加有关。本研究旨在探讨对已戒毒的 AUD 住院患者的左侧前额叶皮质进行 10 次额外的 tDCS 治疗是否能在三个月后减少渴求并提高戒断率:方法:对已戒毒的AUD住院患者进行随机分配,要么接受常规治疗(TAU),同时在左侧DLPFC上进行10次主动tDCS治疗;要么接受常规治疗,同时进行10次假tDCS治疗,每天两次,连续5天:结果:广义线性混合模型(GLMM)的结果显示,时间对OCDS评分有显著影响,但治疗或这两个因素之间的交互作用对OCDS评分均无显著影响;在意向治疗分析中,Chi-square检验未显示积极治疗组和假治疗组在完全戒断率方面存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of Addictive Diseases is an essential, comprehensive resource covering the full range of addictions for today"s addiction professional. This in-depth, practical journal helps you stay on top of the vital issues and the clinical skills necessary to ensure effective practice. The latest research, treatments, and public policy issues in addiction medicine are presented in a fully integrated, multi-specialty perspective. Top researchers and respected leaders in addiction issues share their knowledge and insights to keep you up-to-date on the most important research and practical applications.
期刊最新文献
Prospective study of long COVID-related psychological and biological outcomes in individuals with tobacco use disorder. Real-world deployment of machine learning models for opioid overdose and opioid use disorder: a systematic review of clinical and operational lessons for addiction medicine. Emergency department-initiated buprenorphine vs brief intervention for opioid use disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Fenethylline (Captagon) in West Asia: chemical profile, socio-political drivers, public health impact, and strategies for regional control. Opioid use disorder and concurrent benzodiazepine use: clinical risks and management strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1