T L Magwali, E Butrick, A E Ayadi, E Bergel, L Gibbons, N T Huong, M Merialdi, V Mambo, S Miller
{"title":"A cluster randomized controlled trial of the non-pneumatic anti-shock garment for obstetric haemorrhage: sub-analysis of the Zimbabwean Arm.","authors":"T L Magwali, E Butrick, A E Ayadi, E Bergel, L Gibbons, N T Huong, M Merialdi, V Mambo, S Miller","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine whether earlier application of the Non-pneumatic Anti-Shock Garment (NASG) at clinic level compared to the referral hospital level reduces maternal morbidity and mortality and recovery time from shock due to severe Obstetric Haemorrhage (OH) and to determine the safety of the NASG when applied at clinic level.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Harare and Parirenyatwa Referral Hospitals (RH) in Harare and the twelve Harare City Council clinics that offer maternity care.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Women who had suffered severe OH at clinic level and were being transferred to a Referral Hospital (RH).</p><p><strong>Iterventions: </strong>The clinics were randomized into two groups. In the early NASG group eligible women were given the standard management for OH and had the NASG applied at the clinic level before transport to RH. In the control group, eligible women were given the standard management for OH at the clinic level, transferred to the RH, and received the NASG at the RH. All women received equivalent OH/hypovolemic shock management at the RH.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The main outcome measures were maternal mortality and morbidity, blood loss, recovery from shock and the occurrence of side effects whilst in the NASG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were few maternal deaths and morbidities, and no statistically significant differences between the two groups were noted. Women in the early NASG group spent a statistically significant shorter time in the NASG at referral hospital level (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.52 - 0.79, p < 0.001) and had a non-significant 40% faster recovery from shock (HR 1.39; 95% CI 0.98-1.97, p=0.07). There were no differences in reported side effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Earlier NASG application at the clinic level was associated with faster recovery from shock in women who had suffered severe OH and appears safe to use.</p>","PeriodicalId":74979,"journal":{"name":"The Central African journal of medicine","volume":"61 5-8","pages":"27-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Central African journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To determine whether earlier application of the Non-pneumatic Anti-Shock Garment (NASG) at clinic level compared to the referral hospital level reduces maternal morbidity and mortality and recovery time from shock due to severe Obstetric Haemorrhage (OH) and to determine the safety of the NASG when applied at clinic level.
Design: A cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
Setting: Harare and Parirenyatwa Referral Hospitals (RH) in Harare and the twelve Harare City Council clinics that offer maternity care.
Subjects: Women who had suffered severe OH at clinic level and were being transferred to a Referral Hospital (RH).
Iterventions: The clinics were randomized into two groups. In the early NASG group eligible women were given the standard management for OH and had the NASG applied at the clinic level before transport to RH. In the control group, eligible women were given the standard management for OH at the clinic level, transferred to the RH, and received the NASG at the RH. All women received equivalent OH/hypovolemic shock management at the RH.
Main outcome measures: The main outcome measures were maternal mortality and morbidity, blood loss, recovery from shock and the occurrence of side effects whilst in the NASG.
Results: There were few maternal deaths and morbidities, and no statistically significant differences between the two groups were noted. Women in the early NASG group spent a statistically significant shorter time in the NASG at referral hospital level (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.52 - 0.79, p < 0.001) and had a non-significant 40% faster recovery from shock (HR 1.39; 95% CI 0.98-1.97, p=0.07). There were no differences in reported side effects.
Conclusion: Earlier NASG application at the clinic level was associated with faster recovery from shock in women who had suffered severe OH and appears safe to use.
目的:确定与转诊医院水平相比,早期在临床水平应用非气动抗休克服(NASG)是否能降低产妇发病率和死亡率以及因严重产科出血(OH)引起的休克恢复时间,并确定NASG在临床水平应用时的安全性。设计:集群随机对照试验(RCT)环境:哈拉雷的哈拉雷和Parirenyatwa转诊医院(RH)以及哈拉雷市议会提供产科护理的12家诊所。受试者:在诊所水平患有严重OH并被转移到转诊医院(RH)的妇女。干预措施:临床随机分为两组。在早期的NASG组中,符合条件的妇女给予OH的标准管理,并在转到RH之前在临床水平上应用NASG。在对照组中,符合条件的妇女在临床层面给予OH的标准管理,转移到RH,并在RH接受NASG。所有妇女在RH接受同等的OH/低血容量性休克管理。主要结局指标:主要结局指标为产妇死亡率和发病率、失血量、休克恢复情况和不良反应发生情况。结果:两组产妇死亡率和发病率均较低,差异无统计学意义。早期接受NASG治疗的女性在转诊医院接受NASG治疗的时间较短(OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.52 - 0.79, p < 0.001),休克恢复速度快40% (HR 1.39;95% CI 0.98-1.97, p=0.07)。报告的副作用没有差异。结论:在临床水平上早期应用NASG与患有严重OH的妇女休克恢复更快有关,并且使用NASG似乎是安全的。