A two-year follow-up: Twitter activity regarding misinformation about spinal manipulation, chiropractic care and boosting immunity during the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Chiropractic & Manual Therapies Pub Date : 2023-01-23 DOI:10.1186/s12998-022-00469-7
Gregory Neil Kawchuk, Steen Harsted, Jan Hartvigsen, Luana Nyirö, Casper Glissmann Nim
{"title":"A two-year follow-up: Twitter activity regarding misinformation about spinal manipulation, chiropractic care and boosting immunity during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Gregory Neil Kawchuk, Steen Harsted, Jan Hartvigsen, Luana Nyirö, Casper Glissmann Nim","doi":"10.1186/s12998-022-00469-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is offered by many health professions, most often by chiropractors. While SMT can be effective for some musculoskeletal disorders, there is no evidence that SMT improves human immunity in a clinically meaningful way. Despite this, we showed previously that Twitter misinformation about chiropractic/SMT  improving immunity increased sharply at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we perform a two-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We previously employed specialized software (i.e. Talkwalker) to search the entirety of Twitter activity in the  months before and after the COVID-19 pandemic was declared (March 11, 2020). In this paper, we conducted follow-up searches over two successive 12 month periods using terms related to SMT, immunity and chiropractic. The resulting tweets were then coded into those promoting/refuting a relation between SMT and immunity (tone) and messaging about chiropractic/interventions (content). Further analyses were performed to subcategorize tweet content, tally likes, retweets and followers, and evaluate refuting tweets and the country of origin. Finally, we created a chronology of Twitter activity superimposed with dates of promoting or refuting activities undertaken by chiropractic organizations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the 27 month study period, Twitter activity peaked on March 31, 2020 then declined continuously. As in our first paper, our follow-up data showed that (1) the ratio of refuting/promoting tweets remained constant and (2) tweets that refuted a relationship between SMT and immunity were substantially more liked, retweeted and followed than those promoting. We also observed that promoting tweets suggesting that SMT improves immunity decreased more rapidly. Overwhelmingly, promoting tweets originated in the USA while refuting tweets originated in Canada, Europe and Australia. The timing of the decline in peak Twitter activity, together with a parallel decline in tweets claiming that SMT improves immunity, was coincident with initiatives by chiropractic organizations and regulators targeting misinformation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overwhelmingly, Twitter activity during the COVID-19 pandemic focussed on refuting a relation between chiropractic/SMT and immunity. A decline in Twitter activity promoting a relation between SMT and immunity was observed to coincide with initiatives from chiropractic organizations and regulators to refute these claims. The majority of misinformation about this topic is generated in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":48572,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","volume":"31 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9870654/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-022-00469-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is offered by many health professions, most often by chiropractors. While SMT can be effective for some musculoskeletal disorders, there is no evidence that SMT improves human immunity in a clinically meaningful way. Despite this, we showed previously that Twitter misinformation about chiropractic/SMT  improving immunity increased sharply at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we perform a two-year follow-up.

Methods: We previously employed specialized software (i.e. Talkwalker) to search the entirety of Twitter activity in the  months before and after the COVID-19 pandemic was declared (March 11, 2020). In this paper, we conducted follow-up searches over two successive 12 month periods using terms related to SMT, immunity and chiropractic. The resulting tweets were then coded into those promoting/refuting a relation between SMT and immunity (tone) and messaging about chiropractic/interventions (content). Further analyses were performed to subcategorize tweet content, tally likes, retweets and followers, and evaluate refuting tweets and the country of origin. Finally, we created a chronology of Twitter activity superimposed with dates of promoting or refuting activities undertaken by chiropractic organizations.

Results: Over the 27 month study period, Twitter activity peaked on March 31, 2020 then declined continuously. As in our first paper, our follow-up data showed that (1) the ratio of refuting/promoting tweets remained constant and (2) tweets that refuted a relationship between SMT and immunity were substantially more liked, retweeted and followed than those promoting. We also observed that promoting tweets suggesting that SMT improves immunity decreased more rapidly. Overwhelmingly, promoting tweets originated in the USA while refuting tweets originated in Canada, Europe and Australia. The timing of the decline in peak Twitter activity, together with a parallel decline in tweets claiming that SMT improves immunity, was coincident with initiatives by chiropractic organizations and regulators targeting misinformation.

Conclusion: Overwhelmingly, Twitter activity during the COVID-19 pandemic focussed on refuting a relation between chiropractic/SMT and immunity. A decline in Twitter activity promoting a relation between SMT and immunity was observed to coincide with initiatives from chiropractic organizations and regulators to refute these claims. The majority of misinformation about this topic is generated in the United States.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为期两年的跟踪调查:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,推特上关于脊柱推拿、脊椎按摩护理和提高免疫力的错误信息。
背景:脊柱推拿疗法(SMT)由许多医疗行业提供,最常见的是由脊骨神经科医生提供。虽然脊柱推拿疗法对某些肌肉骨骼疾病有一定疗效,但没有证据表明脊柱推拿疗法能有效提高人体免疫力。尽管如此,我们之前的研究表明,在 COVID-19 大流行之初,推特上关于脊椎按摩/SMT 可提高免疫力的错误信息急剧增加。在此,我们进行了为期两年的跟踪调查:我们曾使用专业软件(即 Talkwalker)搜索了 COVID-19 大流行宣布(2020 年 3 月 11 日)前后几个月的全部 Twitter 活动。在本文中,我们使用与 SMT、免疫力和脊椎按摩相关的术语对连续两个 12 个月的推特活动进行了跟踪搜索。随后,我们将搜索到的推文编码为促进/反驳 SMT 与免疫力之间关系的推文(语气)和有关整脊/干预的推文(内容)。通过进一步分析,我们对推文内容进行了细分,统计了点赞、转发和粉丝数,并对反驳推文和来源国进行了评估。最后,我们创建了推特活动年表,并与脊骨神经科组织开展的宣传或反驳活动的日期相叠加:在 27 个月的研究期间,推特活动在 2020 年 3 月 31 日达到顶峰,随后持续下降。与第一篇论文一样,我们的后续数据显示:(1)反驳/宣传推文的比例保持不变;(2)反驳 SMT 与免疫力之间关系的推文的点赞、转发和关注量远高于宣传推文。我们还观察到,宣传 SMT 可提高免疫力的推文减少得更快。绝大多数推广推文都来自美国,而反驳推文则来自加拿大、欧洲和澳大利亚。推特活动峰值下降的时间,与声称 SMT 可提高免疫力的推文同时下降的时间,与脊骨神经科组织和监管机构针对错误信息采取的措施不谋而合:结论:在COVID-19大流行期间,Twitter上的绝大多数活动都集中在驳斥脊骨神经医学/SMT与免疫力之间的关系上。在脊骨神经科组织和监管机构主动驳斥这些说法的同时,推特上宣传 SMT 与免疫力之间关系的活动也有所减少。关于这一话题的大部分错误信息都是在美国产生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
48
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies publishes manuscripts on all aspects of evidence-based information that is clinically relevant to chiropractors, manual therapists and related health care professionals. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies is an open access journal that aims to provide chiropractors, manual therapists and related health professionals with clinically relevant, evidence-based information. Chiropractic and other manual therapies share a relatively broad diagnostic practice and treatment scope, emphasizing the structure and function of the body''s musculoskeletal framework (especially the spine). The practices of chiropractic and manual therapies are closely associated with treatments including manipulation, which is a key intervention. The range of services provided can also include massage, mobilisation, physical therapies, dry needling, lifestyle and dietary counselling, plus a variety of other associated therapeutic and rehabilitation approaches. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies continues to serve as a critical resource in this field, and as an open access publication, is more readily available to practitioners, researchers and clinicians worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Public perception of chiropractic in the Taiwanese population: a cross-sectional survey. Development and preliminary validation of the Danish headache questionnaire. A multi-level implementation strategy to increase adoption of chiropractic care for low back pain in primary care clinics: a randomized stepped-wedge pilot study protocol. Insights into how manual therapists incorporate the biopsychosocial-enactive model in the care of individuals with CLBP: a qualitative study. Preliminary insights into the effects of spinal manipulation therapy of different force magnitudes on blood biomarkers of oxidative stress and pro-resolution of inflammation mediators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1