A comparison of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) to biomarker testing for staging fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

IF 3 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine Translational gastroenterology and hepatology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.21037/tgh-22-27
Joseph M Kaplan, Jamil Alexis, Gregory Grimaldi, Mohammed Islam, Stephanie M Izard, Tai-Ping Lee
{"title":"A comparison of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) to biomarker testing for staging fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).","authors":"Joseph M Kaplan,&nbsp;Jamil Alexis,&nbsp;Gregory Grimaldi,&nbsp;Mohammed Islam,&nbsp;Stephanie M Izard,&nbsp;Tai-Ping Lee","doi":"10.21037/tgh-22-27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the world's most prevalent chronic liver disease. In advanced stages, it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and scoring panels Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) and NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS) are useful noninvasive alternatives to liver biopsy for fibrosis staging. Our study aimed to determine how well MRE corresponds with both FIB-4 and NFS at different stages of fibrosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective chart review of patients age ≥18 with NAFLD as their only known liver disease who underwent MRE within six months of a lab draw. MRE stratified patients into fibrosis stages using kPa values. FIB-4 categorized patients as Advanced Fibrosis Excluded, Further Investigation Needed or Advanced Fibrosis Likely. NFS categorized them as F0-2, Indeterminate or F3-4. MRE fibrosis staging was compared to FIB-4 and NFS for both ruling out advanced fibrosis and identifying advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 193 patients met inclusion criteria. Our statistical analysis included calculating positive predictive values (PPVs) and negative predictive values (NPVs), which are the proportions of positive and negative fibrosis screening results that correspond to positive and negative MRE results respectively. NPV for FIB-4 (0.84) and NFS (0.89) in the 'rule out advanced fibrosis' category signify that 84% and 89% of respective biomarker scores correspond to MRE in early stage disease. The PPV for FIB-4 and NFS in the 'identify advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis' category signify 63% and 72% of respective biomarker scores correspond to MRE in late stage disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FIB-4 and NFS scores indicating little to no fibrosis correspond extremely well with MRE, while scores suggesting advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis correspond less convincingly. MRE shows promise as an effective alternative to liver biopsy, however our study suggests FIB-4 and NFS alone may be sufficient for fibrosis staging, particularly in early stage NAFLD.</p>","PeriodicalId":23267,"journal":{"name":"Translational gastroenterology and hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/42/2b/tgh-08-22-27.PMC9813653.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational gastroenterology and hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tgh-22-27","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the world's most prevalent chronic liver disease. In advanced stages, it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and scoring panels Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) and NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS) are useful noninvasive alternatives to liver biopsy for fibrosis staging. Our study aimed to determine how well MRE corresponds with both FIB-4 and NFS at different stages of fibrosis.

Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients age ≥18 with NAFLD as their only known liver disease who underwent MRE within six months of a lab draw. MRE stratified patients into fibrosis stages using kPa values. FIB-4 categorized patients as Advanced Fibrosis Excluded, Further Investigation Needed or Advanced Fibrosis Likely. NFS categorized them as F0-2, Indeterminate or F3-4. MRE fibrosis staging was compared to FIB-4 and NFS for both ruling out advanced fibrosis and identifying advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis.

Results: Overall, 193 patients met inclusion criteria. Our statistical analysis included calculating positive predictive values (PPVs) and negative predictive values (NPVs), which are the proportions of positive and negative fibrosis screening results that correspond to positive and negative MRE results respectively. NPV for FIB-4 (0.84) and NFS (0.89) in the 'rule out advanced fibrosis' category signify that 84% and 89% of respective biomarker scores correspond to MRE in early stage disease. The PPV for FIB-4 and NFS in the 'identify advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis' category signify 63% and 72% of respective biomarker scores correspond to MRE in late stage disease.

Conclusions: FIB-4 and NFS scores indicating little to no fibrosis correspond extremely well with MRE, while scores suggesting advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis correspond less convincingly. MRE shows promise as an effective alternative to liver biopsy, however our study suggests FIB-4 and NFS alone may be sufficient for fibrosis staging, particularly in early stage NAFLD.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
磁共振弹性成像(MRE)与非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)纤维化分期的生物标志物检测的比较
背景:非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)是世界上最常见的慢性肝病。在晚期,它与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。磁共振弹性成像(MRE)和评分面板纤维化-4 (FIB-4)和NAFLD纤维化评分(NFS)是有用的无创肝活检纤维化分期替代方案。我们的研究旨在确定MRE在纤维化的不同阶段与FIB-4和NFS的对应程度。方法:我们对年龄≥18岁的NAFLD患者进行了回顾性图表回顾,NAFLD是他们唯一已知的肝脏疾病,在实验室抽检后6个月内接受了MRE。MRE用kPa值将患者按纤维化分期进行分层。FIB-4将患者分为排除晚期纤维化、需要进一步调查或可能发生晚期纤维化。NFS将其分类为F0-2、不确定或F3-4。将MRE纤维化分期与FIB-4和NFS进行比较,以排除晚期纤维化和确定晚期纤维化/肝硬化。结果:总体而言,193例患者符合纳入标准。我们的统计分析包括计算阳性预测值(positive predictive values, PPVs)和阴性预测值(negative predictive values, npv),即纤维化筛查结果阳性和阴性分别对应MRE阳性和阴性结果的比例。FIB-4(0.84)和NFS(0.89)在“排除晚期纤维化”类别中的NPV表明各自生物标志物评分的84%和89%对应于早期疾病的MRE。FIB-4和NFS在“确定晚期纤维化/肝硬化”类别中的PPV表明各自生物标志物评分的63%和72%对应于晚期疾病的MRE。结论:FIB-4和NFS评分显示很少或无纤维化与MRE非常吻合,而显示晚期纤维化/肝硬化的评分则不太令人信服。MRE有望成为肝活检的有效替代方案,但我们的研究表明,FIB-4和NFS单独可能足以用于纤维化分期,特别是早期NAFLD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol; TGH; Online ISSN 2415-1289) is an open-access, peer-reviewed online journal that focuses on cutting-edge findings in the field of translational research in gastroenterology and hepatology and provides current and practical information on diagnosis, prevention and clinical investigations of gastrointestinal, pancreas, gallbladder and hepatic diseases. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, multimodality therapy, biomarkers, imaging, biology, pathology, and technical advances related to gastrointestinal and hepatic diseases. Contributions pertinent to gastroenterology and hepatology are also included from related fields such as nutrition, surgery, public health, human genetics, basic sciences, education, sociology, and nursing.
期刊最新文献
A fucoidan plant drink reduces Helicobacter pylori load in the stomach: a real-world study Risk of second cancer in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma survivors: a population-based analysis in SEER dataset Application and effectiveness of an improved endoscopically guided nasojejunal tube placement technique in critically ill patients: a retrospective cohort study The real efficacy of microbiota restoration following standard of care antimicrobial in patients with recurrent Clostridiodes difficile Therapeutic advancement in inflammatory bowel disease by incorporating plant-based diet
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1