Multicriteria decision making and goal programming for determination of electric automobile aimed at sustainable green environment: a case study.

Mustafa Hamurcu, Tamer Eren
{"title":"Multicriteria decision making and goal programming for determination of electric automobile aimed at sustainable green environment: a case study.","authors":"Mustafa Hamurcu,&nbsp;Tamer Eren","doi":"10.1007/s10669-022-09878-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this paper, we consider the problem of automobile selection for transportation in inner city using a hybrid multicriteria decision making approach. The electric automobiles that are a relatively new concept in the world of the automotive industry, are widely viewed as attractive among its alternatives day by day. Fuel-vehicles produce a lot of carbon emissions that are ejected into our natural atmosphere, leaving us vulnerable to things like pollution and greenhouse gases. So, electric vehicle and automobiles have emerged as a more efficient alternative and these vehicles have been a great step forward to help positively the environment with zero emissions and total energy consumption in their lifecycle. Many companies focus on electric vehicle production with the development of electric vehicle technology. Therefore, the selection process emerges among the various electric automobile technologies for the users. The selection process includes several conflicting factors which are such as economic, technical and technological factors. In the present study, we propose a hybrid approach for electric automobile selection that combines analytic hierarchy process (AHP), technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and goal programming (GP) is used to determine the weights to assign to the factors that go into these selection decisions and TOPSIS method is used for preference ranking. These weights founded by AHP are inputted into a GP model to determine the best alternative among the electric automobiles. Finally, the study used three methods TOPSIS, AHP- TOPSIS and AHP-GP for better comparison and evaluation. The most suitable electric automobile is selected among their alternatives by using analytic methods and goal programming.</p>","PeriodicalId":72928,"journal":{"name":"Environment systems & decisions","volume":"43 2","pages":"211-231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9468252/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment systems & decisions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-022-09878-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the problem of automobile selection for transportation in inner city using a hybrid multicriteria decision making approach. The electric automobiles that are a relatively new concept in the world of the automotive industry, are widely viewed as attractive among its alternatives day by day. Fuel-vehicles produce a lot of carbon emissions that are ejected into our natural atmosphere, leaving us vulnerable to things like pollution and greenhouse gases. So, electric vehicle and automobiles have emerged as a more efficient alternative and these vehicles have been a great step forward to help positively the environment with zero emissions and total energy consumption in their lifecycle. Many companies focus on electric vehicle production with the development of electric vehicle technology. Therefore, the selection process emerges among the various electric automobile technologies for the users. The selection process includes several conflicting factors which are such as economic, technical and technological factors. In the present study, we propose a hybrid approach for electric automobile selection that combines analytic hierarchy process (AHP), technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and goal programming (GP) is used to determine the weights to assign to the factors that go into these selection decisions and TOPSIS method is used for preference ranking. These weights founded by AHP are inputted into a GP model to determine the best alternative among the electric automobiles. Finally, the study used three methods TOPSIS, AHP- TOPSIS and AHP-GP for better comparison and evaluation. The most suitable electric automobile is selected among their alternatives by using analytic methods and goal programming.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以可持续绿色环境为目标的电动汽车多准则决策与目标规划研究。
本文采用一种混合多准则决策方法来研究市中心交通车辆选择问题。电动汽车在世界汽车工业中是一个相对较新的概念,在其替代品中日益被广泛认为是有吸引力的。燃油汽车产生大量的碳排放,排放到我们的自然大气中,使我们容易受到污染和温室气体等问题的影响。因此,电动汽车和汽车已经成为一种更高效的替代方案,这些汽车已经向前迈出了一大步,在其生命周期内实现零排放和总能耗,对环境有积极的帮助。随着电动汽车技术的发展,许多企业开始关注电动汽车的生产。因此,用户在各种电动汽车技术中出现了选择过程。选择过程包括经济、技术和工艺等几个相互冲突的因素。在本研究中,我们提出了一种混合的电动汽车选择方法,该方法结合了层次分析法(AHP)、理想解相似性偏好排序技术(TOPSIS)和目标规划(GP)来确定这些选择决策中各因素的权重,并使用TOPSIS方法进行偏好排序。将AHP建立的这些权重输入到GP模型中,以确定电动汽车中的最佳替代方案。最后采用TOPSIS、AHP- TOPSIS和AHP- gp三种方法进行比较和评价。运用分析方法和目标规划的方法,从备选方案中选择出最合适的电动汽车。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Structured decision making remains underused in ecological restoration despite opportunities A generalized framework for designing open-source natural hazard parametric insurance A self-adaptation-based approach to resilience improvement of complex internets of utility systems A performance comparison of machine learning models for wildfire occurrence risk prediction in the Brazilian Federal District region Climate labels and the restaurant industry: a qualitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1