Diagnostic efficiency of the FilmArray blood culture identification (BCID) panel: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY Journal of medical microbiology Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1099/jmm.0.001608
Mei Yang, Chuanmin Tao
{"title":"Diagnostic efficiency of the FilmArray blood culture identification (BCID) panel: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mei Yang,&nbsp;Chuanmin Tao","doi":"10.1099/jmm.0.001608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>. The FilmArray blood culture identification panel (BCID) panel is a multiplex PCR assay with high sensitivity and specificity to identify the most common pathogens in bloodstream infections (BSIs).<b>Hypothesis</b>. We hypothesize that the BCID panel has good diagnostic performance for BSIs and can be popularized in clinical application.<b>Aim:</b> To provide summarized evidence for the diagnostic accuracy of the BCID panel for the identification of positive blood cultures.<b>Methodology.</b> We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases through March 2021 and assessed the efficacy of the diagnostic test of the BCID panel. We performed a meta-analysis and calculated the summary sensitivity and specificity of the BCID panel. Systematic review protocols were registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (registration number CRD42021239176).<b>Results</b>. A total of 16 full-text articles were eligible for analysis. The overall sensitivities of the BCID panel on Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria and fungi were 97 % (95 % CI, 0.96-0.98), 100 % (95 % CI, 0.98-01.00) and 99 % (95 % CI, 0.87-1.00), respectively. The pooled diagnostic specificities were 99 % (95 % CI, 0.97-1.00), 100 % (95 % CI, 1.00-1.00) and 100 % (95 % CI, 1.00-1.00) for Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria and fungi, respectively.<b>Conclusions</b>. The BCID panel has high rule-in value for the early detection of BSI patients. The BCID panel can still provide valuable information for ruling out bacteremia or fungemia in populations with low pretest probability.</p>","PeriodicalId":16343,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical microbiology","volume":"72 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001608","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction. The FilmArray blood culture identification panel (BCID) panel is a multiplex PCR assay with high sensitivity and specificity to identify the most common pathogens in bloodstream infections (BSIs).Hypothesis. We hypothesize that the BCID panel has good diagnostic performance for BSIs and can be popularized in clinical application.Aim: To provide summarized evidence for the diagnostic accuracy of the BCID panel for the identification of positive blood cultures.Methodology. We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases through March 2021 and assessed the efficacy of the diagnostic test of the BCID panel. We performed a meta-analysis and calculated the summary sensitivity and specificity of the BCID panel. Systematic review protocols were registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (registration number CRD42021239176).Results. A total of 16 full-text articles were eligible for analysis. The overall sensitivities of the BCID panel on Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria and fungi were 97 % (95 % CI, 0.96-0.98), 100 % (95 % CI, 0.98-01.00) and 99 % (95 % CI, 0.87-1.00), respectively. The pooled diagnostic specificities were 99 % (95 % CI, 0.97-1.00), 100 % (95 % CI, 1.00-1.00) and 100 % (95 % CI, 1.00-1.00) for Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria and fungi, respectively.Conclusions. The BCID panel has high rule-in value for the early detection of BSI patients. The BCID panel can still provide valuable information for ruling out bacteremia or fungemia in populations with low pretest probability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FilmArray血培养鉴定(BCID)小组的诊断效率:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
介绍。FilmArray血培养鉴定面板(BCID)面板是一种多重PCR检测方法,具有高灵敏度和特异性,用于鉴定血液感染(bsi)中最常见的病原体。我们假设BCID面板对脑损伤有较好的诊断效果,可在临床推广应用。目的:为BCID小组鉴别阳性血培养的诊断准确性提供总结证据。我们检索了截至2021年3月的MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库,并评估了BCID小组诊断测试的有效性。我们进行了荟萃分析,并计算了BCID组的总敏感性和特异性。系统评价方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价登记册(PROSPERO)注册(注册号CRD42021239176)。共有16篇全文文章符合分析条件。BCID面板对革兰氏阳性菌、革兰氏阴性菌和真菌的总体敏感性分别为97% (95% CI, 0.96 ~ 0.98)、100% (95% CI, 0.98 ~ 1.00)和99% (95% CI, 0.87 ~ 1.00)。革兰氏阳性菌、革兰氏阴性菌和真菌的合并诊断特异性分别为99% (95% CI, 0.97-1.00)、100% (95% CI, 1.00-1.00)和100% (95% CI, 1.00-1.00)。BCID面板对BSI患者的早期发现具有很高的规则价值。BCID小组仍然可以提供有价值的信息,以排除菌血症或真菌血症在低检测前概率的人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of medical microbiology
Journal of medical microbiology 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
143
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Microbiology provides comprehensive coverage of medical, dental and veterinary microbiology, and infectious diseases. We welcome everything from laboratory research to clinical trials, including bacteriology, virology, mycology and parasitology. We publish articles under the following subject categories: Antimicrobial resistance; Clinical microbiology; Disease, diagnosis and diagnostics; Medical mycology; Molecular and microbial epidemiology; Microbiome and microbial ecology in health; One Health; Pathogenesis, virulence and host response; Prevention, therapy and therapeutics
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic efficiency of the FilmArray blood culture identification (BCID) panel: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Erratum: Utility of in-house and commercial PCR assay in diagnosis of Covid-19 associated mucormycosis in an emergency setting in a tertiary care center. A modified Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion (mKB) method for accurately testing tigecycline susceptibility: a nation-wide multicenter comparative study. Evaluation of the efficacy of tongue swab and saliva as samples for testing COVID-19 infection in symptomatic cases in comparison with nasopharyngeal swab. Hidden bugs in a newly opened hospital: the distribution of skin microbiota among healthcare workers in a newly opened teaching hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1