Factors associated with clinician treatment recommendations for patients with a new diagnosis of opioid use disorder

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108827
Lewei (Allison) Lin , Victoria D. Powell , Colin Macleod , Amy S.B. Bohnert , Pooja Lagisetty
{"title":"Factors associated with clinician treatment recommendations for patients with a new diagnosis of opioid use disorder","authors":"Lewei (Allison) Lin ,&nbsp;Victoria D. Powell ,&nbsp;Colin Macleod ,&nbsp;Amy S.B. Bohnert ,&nbsp;Pooja Lagisetty","doi":"10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study examined factors associated with treatment recommendations for patients with a new diagnosis of opioid use disorder (OUD), comparing recommendations for patients with clear signs of OUD versus those with lower likelihood of OUD.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>The study conducted a retrospective medical chart review in a randomly selected national sample of 520 Veteran Health Administration patients with a new opioid-related electronic health record (EHR) diagnosis from 2012 to 2017. The study categorized patients as having “high likelihood” or “lower likelihood of OUD” based on the presence or absence of clinician documentation in </span>medical records of specific qualifying criteria (e.g., clinician documentation of patient meeting diagnostic criteria for OUD, etc). Analyses examined the association between baseline demographic and clinical characteristics with recommendations for medication and other treatments for OUD.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among patients with a new diagnosis of OUD, 28.7 % (n = 149) were recommended medication treatment, 52.5 % (n = 273) were recommended specialty substance use disorder (SUD) treatment, and 41.9 % (n = 218) were recommended treatment in non-SUD mental health<span> settings. In adjusted models, high likelihood of OUD (AOR 8.31, 95 % CI 4.81–15.03) was strongly associated with the clinician recommending medications for OUD, while age 56–75 (compared to &lt;35, AOR 0.36, 95 % CI 0.18–0.69), stimulant use disorder (AOR 0.28, 95 % CI 0.15–0.53), and rural residence (AOR 0.51, 95 % CI 0.30–0.85) were associated with lower likelihood of being recommended medication treatment.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Differentiating among patients with EHR diagnoses of OUD to identify the subset with higher likelihood of underlying OUD is important to accurately understand OUD treatment rates and disparities. However, even among patients with a clear diagnosis of OUD, medication treatment is still recommended less often than other treatments, suggesting interventions are needed to encourage clinicians to prioritize medication treatment as a first-line treatment, especially for older, rural patients and those with polysubstance use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17148,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 108827"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074054722200109X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background

This study examined factors associated with treatment recommendations for patients with a new diagnosis of opioid use disorder (OUD), comparing recommendations for patients with clear signs of OUD versus those with lower likelihood of OUD.

Methods

The study conducted a retrospective medical chart review in a randomly selected national sample of 520 Veteran Health Administration patients with a new opioid-related electronic health record (EHR) diagnosis from 2012 to 2017. The study categorized patients as having “high likelihood” or “lower likelihood of OUD” based on the presence or absence of clinician documentation in medical records of specific qualifying criteria (e.g., clinician documentation of patient meeting diagnostic criteria for OUD, etc). Analyses examined the association between baseline demographic and clinical characteristics with recommendations for medication and other treatments for OUD.

Results

Among patients with a new diagnosis of OUD, 28.7 % (n = 149) were recommended medication treatment, 52.5 % (n = 273) were recommended specialty substance use disorder (SUD) treatment, and 41.9 % (n = 218) were recommended treatment in non-SUD mental health settings. In adjusted models, high likelihood of OUD (AOR 8.31, 95 % CI 4.81–15.03) was strongly associated with the clinician recommending medications for OUD, while age 56–75 (compared to <35, AOR 0.36, 95 % CI 0.18–0.69), stimulant use disorder (AOR 0.28, 95 % CI 0.15–0.53), and rural residence (AOR 0.51, 95 % CI 0.30–0.85) were associated with lower likelihood of being recommended medication treatment.

Conclusions

Differentiating among patients with EHR diagnoses of OUD to identify the subset with higher likelihood of underlying OUD is important to accurately understand OUD treatment rates and disparities. However, even among patients with a clear diagnosis of OUD, medication treatment is still recommended less often than other treatments, suggesting interventions are needed to encourage clinicians to prioritize medication treatment as a first-line treatment, especially for older, rural patients and those with polysubstance use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与临床医生对阿片类药物使用障碍新诊断患者的治疗建议相关的因素
本研究考察了与阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)新诊断患者的治疗建议相关的因素,比较了有明显OUD迹象的患者和发生OUD可能性较低的患者的建议。方法对2012年至2017年全国随机抽取520例阿片类药物相关电子健康记录(EHR)新诊断的退伍军人卫生管理局患者进行回顾性病历回顾。该研究将患者分为“高可能性”或“低可能性”,基于医疗记录中是否存在特定资格标准的临床医生文件(例如,临床医生文件证明患者符合OUD的诊断标准等)。分析检查了基线人口统计学和临床特征与OUD药物治疗和其他治疗建议之间的关系。结果在新诊断为OUD的患者中,28.7% (n = 149)推荐药物治疗,52.5% (n = 273)推荐特殊物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗,41.9% (n = 218)推荐非SUD精神卫生机构治疗。在调整后的模型中,患OUD的高可能性(AOR 8.31, 95% CI 4.81-15.03)与临床医生推荐OUD药物的可能性密切相关,而56-75岁(与35岁相比,AOR 0.36, 95% CI 0.18-0.69)、兴奋剂使用障碍(AOR 0.28, 95% CI 0.15-0.53)和农村居住(AOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.30-0.85)与推荐药物治疗的可能性较低相关。结论在EHR诊断为OUD的患者中进行区分,以确定潜在OUD可能性较高的亚群,对于准确了解OUD治疗率和差异具有重要意义。然而,即使在明确诊断为OUD的患者中,药物治疗的推荐率仍然低于其他治疗方法,这表明需要采取干预措施,鼓励临床医生优先考虑药物治疗作为一线治疗,特别是对于老年人,农村患者和多物质使用患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
220
期刊介绍: The Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (JSAT) features original reviews, training and educational articles, special commentary, and especially research articles that are meaningful to the treatment of alcohol, heroin, marijuana, and other drugs of dependence. JSAT is directed toward treatment practitioners from all disciplines (medicine, nursing, social work, psychology, and counseling) in both private and public sectors, including those involved in schools, health centers, community agencies, correctional facilities, and individual practices. The editors emphasize that JSAT articles should address techniques and treatment approaches that can be used directly by contemporary practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Not in my treatment center: Leadership's perception of barriers to MOUD adoption Peer support to reduce readmission in Medicaid-enrolled adults with substance use disorder National trends in buprenorphine prescribing before and during the COVID-19 pandemic A qualitative analysis of barriers to opioid agonist treatment for racial/ethnic minoritized populations An intervention pilot to facilitate harm reduction service decentralization in Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1