The Critical Care Society of Southern Africa Consensus Guideline on ICU Triage and Rationing (ConICTri).

G M Joynt, P D Gopalan, A Argent, S Chetty, R Wise, V K W Lai, E Hodgson, A Lee, I Joubert, S Mokgokong, S Tshukutsoane, G A Richards, C Menezes, L R Mathivha, B Espen, B Levy, K Asante, F Paruk
{"title":"The Critical Care Society of Southern Africa Consensus Guideline on ICU Triage and Rationing (ConICTri).","authors":"G M Joynt,&nbsp;P D Gopalan,&nbsp;A Argent,&nbsp;S Chetty,&nbsp;R Wise,&nbsp;V K W Lai,&nbsp;E Hodgson,&nbsp;A Lee,&nbsp;I Joubert,&nbsp;S Mokgokong,&nbsp;S Tshukutsoane,&nbsp;G A Richards,&nbsp;C Menezes,&nbsp;L R Mathivha,&nbsp;B Espen,&nbsp;B Levy,&nbsp;K Asante,&nbsp;F Paruk","doi":"10.7196/SAJCC.2019.v35i1b.380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In South Africa (SA), administrators and intensive care practitioners are faced with the challenge of resource scarcity as well as an increasing demand for intensive care unit (ICU) services. ICU services are expensive, and practitioners in low- to middle-income countries experience the consequences of limited resources daily. Critically limited resources necessitate that rationing and triage (prioritisation) decisions are routinely necessary in SA, particularly in the publicly funded health sector.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this guideline is to utilise the relevant recommendations of the associated consensus meeting document and other internationally accepted principles to develop a guideline to inform frontline triage policy and ensure the best utilisation of adult intensive care in SA, while maintaining the fair distribution of available resources.</p><p><strong>Recommendations: </strong>An overall conceptual framework for the triage process was developed. The components of the framework were developed on the basis that patients should be admitted preferentially when the likely incremental medical benefit derived from ICU admission justifies admission. An estimate of likely resource use should also form part of the triage decision, with those patients requiring relatively less resources to achieve substantial benefit receiving priority for admission. Thus, the triage system should maximise the benefits obtained from ICU resources available for the community. Where possible, practical examples of what the consensus group agreed would be considered appropriate practice under specified South African circumstances were provided, to assist clinicians with practical decision-making. It must be stressed that this guideline is not intended to be prescriptive for individual hospital or regional practice, and hospitals and regions are encouraged to develop specified local guidelines with locally relevant examples. The guideline should be reviewed and revised if appropriate within 5 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In recognition of the absolute need to limit patient access to ICU because of the lack of sufficient intensive care resources in public hospitals, this guideline has been developed to guide policy-making and assist frontline triage decision-making in SA. This document is not a complete plan for quality practice, but rather a template to support frontline clinicians, guide administrators and inform the public regarding appropriate triage decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":75194,"journal":{"name":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","volume":"35 1b","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.7196/SAJCC.2019.v35i1b.380","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2019.v35i1b.380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Background: In South Africa (SA), administrators and intensive care practitioners are faced with the challenge of resource scarcity as well as an increasing demand for intensive care unit (ICU) services. ICU services are expensive, and practitioners in low- to middle-income countries experience the consequences of limited resources daily. Critically limited resources necessitate that rationing and triage (prioritisation) decisions are routinely necessary in SA, particularly in the publicly funded health sector.

Purpose: The purpose of this guideline is to utilise the relevant recommendations of the associated consensus meeting document and other internationally accepted principles to develop a guideline to inform frontline triage policy and ensure the best utilisation of adult intensive care in SA, while maintaining the fair distribution of available resources.

Recommendations: An overall conceptual framework for the triage process was developed. The components of the framework were developed on the basis that patients should be admitted preferentially when the likely incremental medical benefit derived from ICU admission justifies admission. An estimate of likely resource use should also form part of the triage decision, with those patients requiring relatively less resources to achieve substantial benefit receiving priority for admission. Thus, the triage system should maximise the benefits obtained from ICU resources available for the community. Where possible, practical examples of what the consensus group agreed would be considered appropriate practice under specified South African circumstances were provided, to assist clinicians with practical decision-making. It must be stressed that this guideline is not intended to be prescriptive for individual hospital or regional practice, and hospitals and regions are encouraged to develop specified local guidelines with locally relevant examples. The guideline should be reviewed and revised if appropriate within 5 years.

Conclusion: In recognition of the absolute need to limit patient access to ICU because of the lack of sufficient intensive care resources in public hospitals, this guideline has been developed to guide policy-making and assist frontline triage decision-making in SA. This document is not a complete plan for quality practice, but rather a template to support frontline clinicians, guide administrators and inform the public regarding appropriate triage decision-making.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南部非洲重症监护学会ICU分诊和配给共识指南(ConICTri)。
背景:在南非,管理人员和重症监护从业者面临着资源短缺的挑战,以及对重症监护室服务日益增长的需求。重症监护室服务费用高昂,中低收入国家的从业者每天都会经历资源有限的后果。由于资源极其有限,SA通常需要做出定量配给和分诊(优先级)决定,特别是在公共资助的卫生部门。目的:本指南的目的是利用相关共识会议文件的相关建议和其他国际公认的原则,制定一项指南,为一线分诊政策提供信息,确保SA成人重症监护的最佳利用,同时保持可用资源的公平分配。建议:制定了分诊过程的总体概念框架。该框架的组成部分是在这样一个基础上制定的,即当ICU入院可能带来的医疗效益增加证明入院是合理的时,患者应优先入院。对可能的资源使用情况的估计也应成为分诊决定的一部分,那些需要相对较少资源才能获得实质性福利的患者优先入院。因此,分诊系统应最大限度地利用社区可用的重症监护室资源。在可能的情况下,提供了协商小组同意的在南非特定情况下被视为适当做法的实际例子,以帮助临床医生做出实际决策。必须强调的是,本指南并非针对个别医院或地区实践的规定,鼓励医院和地区制定具有当地相关示例的特定当地指南。如有必要,应在5年内对该准则进行审查和修订。结论:由于公立医院缺乏足够的重症监护资源,因此绝对需要限制患者进入重症监护室,因此制定本指南是为了指导决策并协助SA的一线分诊决策。本文件不是一个完整的质量实践计划,而是一个支持一线临床医生的模板,指导管理人员并告知公众适当的分流决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relevance and application of clinical practice guidelines in different settings. Deep medicine … Navigating the intersection of technology, cognition and ethics in the digital age of medicine. The missed art of care? Prevalence and independent predictors of in-hospital stroke among patients who developed acute alteration of consciousness in the medical intensive care unit: A retrospective case-control study. Carbon dioxide levels of ventilated adult critically ill post-operative patients on arrival at the intensive care unit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1