Simon Lamothe, Masa Peric, Jonathan N Glickman, Yael K Heher
{"title":"Erroneous Patient Tissue Contaminants in 1574 Surgical Pathology Slides: Impact on Diagnostic Error and a Novel Framework for Floater Management.","authors":"Simon Lamothe, Masa Peric, Jonathan N Glickman, Yael K Heher","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2022-0265-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Tissue contaminants on histology slides represent a serious risk of diagnostic error. Despite their pervasive presence, published peer-reviewed criteria defining contaminants are lacking. The absence of a standardized diagnostic workup algorithm for contaminants contributes to variation in management, including investigation and reporting by pathologists.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To study the frequency and type of tissue contaminants on microscopic slides using standardized criteria. Using these data, we propose a taxonomy and algorithm for pathologists on \"floater\" management, including identification, workup, and reporting, with an eye on patient safety.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>A retrospective study arm of 1574 histologic glass slides as well as a prospective study arm of 50 slide contamination events was performed. Using these data we propose a structured classification taxonomy and guidelines for the workup and resolution of tissue contamination events.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>In the retrospective arm of the study, we identified reasonably sized benign tissue contaminants on 52 of 1574 slides (3.3%). We found size to be an important parameter for evaluation, among other visual features including location on the slide, folding, ink, and tissue of origin. The prospective arm of the study suggested that overall, pathologists tend to use similar features when determining management of potentially actionable contaminants. We also report successfully used case-based ancillary testing strategies, including fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of chromosomes and DNA fingerprinting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Tissue contamination events are underreported and represent a patient safety risk. Use of a reproducible classification taxonomy and a standardized algorithm for contaminant workup, management, and reporting may aid pathologists in understanding and reducing risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":8305,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1413-1421"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2022-0265-OA","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context.—: Tissue contaminants on histology slides represent a serious risk of diagnostic error. Despite their pervasive presence, published peer-reviewed criteria defining contaminants are lacking. The absence of a standardized diagnostic workup algorithm for contaminants contributes to variation in management, including investigation and reporting by pathologists.
Objective.—: To study the frequency and type of tissue contaminants on microscopic slides using standardized criteria. Using these data, we propose a taxonomy and algorithm for pathologists on "floater" management, including identification, workup, and reporting, with an eye on patient safety.
Design.—: A retrospective study arm of 1574 histologic glass slides as well as a prospective study arm of 50 slide contamination events was performed. Using these data we propose a structured classification taxonomy and guidelines for the workup and resolution of tissue contamination events.
Results.—: In the retrospective arm of the study, we identified reasonably sized benign tissue contaminants on 52 of 1574 slides (3.3%). We found size to be an important parameter for evaluation, among other visual features including location on the slide, folding, ink, and tissue of origin. The prospective arm of the study suggested that overall, pathologists tend to use similar features when determining management of potentially actionable contaminants. We also report successfully used case-based ancillary testing strategies, including fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of chromosomes and DNA fingerprinting.
Conclusions.—: Tissue contamination events are underreported and represent a patient safety risk. Use of a reproducible classification taxonomy and a standardized algorithm for contaminant workup, management, and reporting may aid pathologists in understanding and reducing risk.
期刊介绍:
Welcome to the website of the Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (APLM). This monthly, peer-reviewed journal of the College of American Pathologists offers global reach and highest measured readership among pathology journals.
Published since 1926, ARCHIVES was voted in 2009 the only pathology journal among the top 100 most influential journals of the past 100 years by the BioMedical and Life Sciences Division of the Special Libraries Association. Online access to the full-text and PDF files of APLM articles is free.