首页 > 最新文献

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Pancreaticobiliary Cytology Practice in 2021: Results of a College of American Pathologists Survey. 2021 年的胰胆细胞学实践:美国病理学家学会调查结果。
IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0167-CP
Zaibo Li, Sana O Tabbara, Ann Nwosu, Rhona J Souers, Abha Goyal, Elizabeth M Kurian, Xiaoqi Lin, Christopher VandenBussche, Lananh N Nguyen

Context.—: The College of American Pathologists (CAP) surveys provide national benchmarks of pathology practice.

Objective.—: To investigate pancreaticobiliary cytology practice in domestic and international laboratories in 2021.

Design.—: We analyzed data from the CAP Pancreaticobiliary Cytology Practice Supplemental Questionnaire that was distributed to laboratories participating in the 2021 CAP Nongynecologic Cytopathology Education Program.

Results.—: Ninety-three percent (567 of 612) of respondent laboratories routinely evaluated pancreaticobiliary cytology specimens. Biliary brushing (85%) was the most common pancreaticobiliary cytology specimen evaluated, followed by pancreatic fine-needle aspiration (79%). The most used sampling methods reported by 235 laboratories were 22-gauge needle for fine-needle aspiration (62%) and SharkCore needle for fine-needle biopsy (27%). Cell block was the most used slide preparation method (76%), followed by liquid-based cytology (59%) for pancreatic cystic lesions. Up to 95% (303 of 320) of laboratories performed rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) on pancreatic solid lesions, while 56% (180 of 320) performed ROSE for cystic lesions. Thirty-six percent (193 of 530) of laboratories used the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology in 2021. Among all institution types, significant differences in specimen volume, specimen type, ROSE practice, and case sign-out were identified. Additionally, significant differences in specimen type, slide preparation, and ROSE practice were found.

Conclusions.—: This is the first survey from the CAP to investigate pancreaticobiliary cytology practice. The findings reveal significant differences among institution types and between domestic and international laboratories. These data provide a baseline for future studies in a variety of practice settings.

背景美国病理学家学会(CAP)的调查提供了病理学实践的国家基准:调查 2021 年国内外实验室的胰胆管细胞学实践:我们分析了CAP胰胆细胞学实践补充问卷中的数据,该问卷已分发给参与2021年CAP非妇科细胞病理学教育计划的实验室:93%的受访实验室(612 家实验室中的 567 家)对胰胆管细胞学标本进行常规评估。胆道刷片(85%)是最常用的胰胆细胞学标本,其次是胰腺细针穿刺(79%)。235 家实验室报告的最常用取样方法是 22 号针细针穿刺(62%)和鲨鱼芯针细针活检(27%)。细胞块是胰腺囊性病变最常用的切片制备方法(76%),其次是液基细胞学(59%)。高达 95% 的实验室(320 家实验室中的 303 家)对胰腺实体病变进行了快速现场评估 (ROSE),而 56% 的实验室(320 家实验室中的 180 家)对胰腺囊性病变进行了 ROSE。36%的实验室(530 家中的 193 家)在 2021 年使用了巴氏细胞病理学会的胰胆管细胞学报告系统。在所有机构类型中,标本量、标本类型、ROSE实践和病例签出均存在显著差异。此外,在标本类型、玻片制备和ROSE实践方面也发现了明显差异:这是 CAP 首次对胰胆细胞学实践进行调查。结论:这是 CAP 首次对胰胆管细胞学实践进行调查,调查结果显示了不同机构类型之间以及国内外实验室之间的显著差异。这些数据为今后在各种实践环境中开展研究提供了基线。
{"title":"Pancreaticobiliary Cytology Practice in 2021: Results of a College of American Pathologists Survey.","authors":"Zaibo Li, Sana O Tabbara, Ann Nwosu, Rhona J Souers, Abha Goyal, Elizabeth M Kurian, Xiaoqi Lin, Christopher VandenBussche, Lananh N Nguyen","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0167-CP","DOIUrl":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0167-CP","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>The College of American Pathologists (CAP) surveys provide national benchmarks of pathology practice.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To investigate pancreaticobiliary cytology practice in domestic and international laboratories in 2021.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>We analyzed data from the CAP Pancreaticobiliary Cytology Practice Supplemental Questionnaire that was distributed to laboratories participating in the 2021 CAP Nongynecologic Cytopathology Education Program.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>Ninety-three percent (567 of 612) of respondent laboratories routinely evaluated pancreaticobiliary cytology specimens. Biliary brushing (85%) was the most common pancreaticobiliary cytology specimen evaluated, followed by pancreatic fine-needle aspiration (79%). The most used sampling methods reported by 235 laboratories were 22-gauge needle for fine-needle aspiration (62%) and SharkCore needle for fine-needle biopsy (27%). Cell block was the most used slide preparation method (76%), followed by liquid-based cytology (59%) for pancreatic cystic lesions. Up to 95% (303 of 320) of laboratories performed rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) on pancreatic solid lesions, while 56% (180 of 320) performed ROSE for cystic lesions. Thirty-six percent (193 of 530) of laboratories used the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology in 2021. Among all institution types, significant differences in specimen volume, specimen type, ROSE practice, and case sign-out were identified. Additionally, significant differences in specimen type, slide preparation, and ROSE practice were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>This is the first survey from the CAP to investigate pancreaticobiliary cytology practice. The findings reveal significant differences among institution types and between domestic and international laboratories. These data provide a baseline for future studies in a variety of practice settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":8305,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10215365","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Implementation of Nongynecologic Reporting Systems in Cytopathology Laboratories Is Highly Variable: Analysis of Data From a 2020 Supplemental Survey of Participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytology. 细胞病理学实验室非妇科报告系统的实施情况千差万别:美国病理学家学会非妇科细胞学实验室间比较计划 2020 年参与者补充调查数据分析》(College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytology)。
IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 Health Professions Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0010-CP
Christopher J VandenBussche, Ann Nwosu, Rhona Souers, Kaitlin E Sundling, Jennifer Brainard, Abha Goyal, Xiaoqi Lin, Shala Masood, Lananh Nguyen, Janie Roberson, Sana O Tabbara, Christine Booth

Context: In recent years, several reporting systems have been developed by national and international cytopathology organizations to standardize the evaluation of specific cytopathology specimen types.

Objective: To assess the current implementation rates, implementation methods, and barriers to implementation of commonly used nongynecologic reporting systems in cytopathology laboratories.

Design: Data were analyzed from a survey developed by the College of American Pathologists Cytopathology Committee and distributed to participants in the College of American Pathologists Nongynecologic Cytopathology Education Program mailing.

Results: Nongynecologic reporting systems with the highest rate of adoption were the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology, 2nd edition (74.1%; 552 of 745); the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (53.9%; 397 of 736); and the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (29.1%; 200 of 688). The most common reason given for not adopting a reporting system was satisfaction with a laboratory's current system. Implementation varied among laboratories with regard to which stakeholders were involved in deciding to implement a system and the amount of education provided during the implementation process.

Conclusions: The implementation of nongynecologic reporting systems in cytopathology laboratories was highly variable.

背景:近年来,国内和国际细胞病理学组织开发了多种报告系统,以规范对特定细胞病理学标本类型的评估:目的:评估目前细胞病理学实验室常用的非妇科报告系统的实施率、实施方法和实施障碍:数据由美国病理学家学会细胞病理学委员会制定,并分发给美国病理学家学会非妇科细胞病理学教育计划邮件的参与者:非妇科细胞病理学报告系统采用率最高的是贝塞斯达甲状腺细胞病理学报告系统第 2 版(74.1%;745 例中的 552 例)、巴黎泌尿系统细胞病理学报告系统(53.9%;736 例中的 397 例)和米兰唾液腺细胞病理学报告系统(29.1%;688 例中的 200 例)。不采用报告系统的最常见原因是对实验室现有系统的满意度。各实验室的实施情况各不相同,这与哪些利益相关者参与了实施系统的决定以及在实施过程中提供的教育程度有关:结论:细胞病理实验室非妇科报告系统的实施情况差异很大。
{"title":"The Implementation of Nongynecologic Reporting Systems in Cytopathology Laboratories Is Highly Variable: Analysis of Data From a 2020 Supplemental Survey of Participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytology.","authors":"Christopher J VandenBussche, Ann Nwosu, Rhona Souers, Kaitlin E Sundling, Jennifer Brainard, Abha Goyal, Xiaoqi Lin, Shala Masood, Lananh Nguyen, Janie Roberson, Sana O Tabbara, Christine Booth","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0010-CP","DOIUrl":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0010-CP","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>In recent years, several reporting systems have been developed by national and international cytopathology organizations to standardize the evaluation of specific cytopathology specimen types.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the current implementation rates, implementation methods, and barriers to implementation of commonly used nongynecologic reporting systems in cytopathology laboratories.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Data were analyzed from a survey developed by the College of American Pathologists Cytopathology Committee and distributed to participants in the College of American Pathologists Nongynecologic Cytopathology Education Program mailing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nongynecologic reporting systems with the highest rate of adoption were the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology, 2nd edition (74.1%; 552 of 745); the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (53.9%; 397 of 736); and the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (29.1%; 200 of 688). The most common reason given for not adopting a reporting system was satisfaction with a laboratory's current system. Implementation varied among laboratories with regard to which stakeholders were involved in deciding to implement a system and the amount of education provided during the implementation process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of nongynecologic reporting systems in cytopathology laboratories was highly variable.</p>","PeriodicalId":8305,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10096357","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Reassessment of the Impact and Significance of Social Media to Pathology. 重新评估社交媒体对病理学的影响和意义。
IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 Health Professions Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2022-0463-RA
Stephanie J T Chen, Megan I Samuelson, Anand Rajan Kd

Context: Social media (SM) use in pathology and medicine today is widespread, receives active advocacy, and is said to bring a host of benefits. In latter days, the harmful effects of SM have received attention, but they have yet been followed by greater encouragement of professionalized SM usage. SM use in medicine has seen adoption in parallel to its general ascendancy, even though the platforms are products with purposes misaligned with the practice of medicine.

Objective: To (1) characterize premises and forces that propel professional SM platform adoption and use, and (2) examine wide-ranging literature, both medical and nonmedical, that substantiates the premises and to find counteracting perspectives and evidence.

Data sources: Review of the literature using relevant keyword searches in PubMed, Google Scholar, Dimensions, and Web of Science for articles that study/describe professional SM use in pathology and medicine. Additionally, we examined business, technology, and social sciences literature and high-quality gray literature (newspapers, books, blogs) that addressed questions in relation to the topic of professional SM adoption.

Conclusions: We identified 6 major premises as motivators of professional SM use and highlight significant counteracting factors. We conclude that the harms of professionalized SM use have not been fully considered in the medical literature and that a change in direction and the creation of new communication platforms would be beneficial.

背景:如今,病理学和医学界对社交媒体(SM)的使用非常普遍,并得到了积极的倡导,据说能带来诸多益处。近来,社交媒体的有害影响受到关注,但随之而来的是对社交媒体专业化使用的更大鼓励。尽管这些平台是与医学实践目的不符的产品,但在医学中使用 SM 的情况与 SM 的普遍兴起并行不悖:目的:(1) 描述推动专业 SM 平台采纳和使用的前提和力量,(2) 研究证实这些前提的医学和非医学方面的大量文献,并寻找反驳观点和证据:通过在 PubMed、Google Scholar、Dimensions 和 Web of Science 中搜索相关关键词,查阅研究/描述病理学和医学专业 SM 使用情况的文献。此外,我们还研究了商业、技术和社会科学文献以及高质量的灰色文献(报纸、书籍、博客),这些文献都涉及了与专业 SM 应用主题相关的问题:我们确定了专业 SM 使用动机的 6 个主要前提,并强调了重要的抵消因素。我们的结论是,医学文献尚未充分考虑专业化 SM 使用的危害,改变方向和创建新的交流平台将是有益的。
{"title":"A Reassessment of the Impact and Significance of Social Media to Pathology.","authors":"Stephanie J T Chen, Megan I Samuelson, Anand Rajan Kd","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2022-0463-RA","DOIUrl":"10.5858/arpa.2022-0463-RA","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Social media (SM) use in pathology and medicine today is widespread, receives active advocacy, and is said to bring a host of benefits. In latter days, the harmful effects of SM have received attention, but they have yet been followed by greater encouragement of professionalized SM usage. SM use in medicine has seen adoption in parallel to its general ascendancy, even though the platforms are products with purposes misaligned with the practice of medicine.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To (1) characterize premises and forces that propel professional SM platform adoption and use, and (2) examine wide-ranging literature, both medical and nonmedical, that substantiates the premises and to find counteracting perspectives and evidence.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Review of the literature using relevant keyword searches in PubMed, Google Scholar, Dimensions, and Web of Science for articles that study/describe professional SM use in pathology and medicine. Additionally, we examined business, technology, and social sciences literature and high-quality gray literature (newspapers, books, blogs) that addressed questions in relation to the topic of professional SM adoption.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified 6 major premises as motivators of professional SM use and highlight significant counteracting factors. We conclude that the harms of professionalized SM use have not been fully considered in the medical literature and that a change in direction and the creation of new communication platforms would be beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":8305,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10101803","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correlation of Red Blood Cell Casts With Renal Dysfunction in Patients With Infection-Related Glomerulonephritis. 感染性肾小球肾炎患者红细胞铸型与肾功能障碍的相关性
IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 Health Professions Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2022-0514-OA
Mineaki Kitamura, Laura Biederman, Dalia Ibrahim, Tibor Nadasdy, Sergey V Brodsky, Anjali A Satoskar

Context: Infection-related glomerulonephritis (IRGN) usually manifests as a proliferative immune-complex glomerulonephritis. The degree of renal dysfunction at presentation can vary. Association with histologic features on kidney biopsy remains unknown.

Objective: To study the correlation between renal function in IRGN at the time of biopsy and the severity of histologic features.

Design: Culture-proven IRGN cases at our facility were included and divided based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 15 ml/min/1.73 m2. Patients' demographic and pathologic findings were obtained from electronic medical records and kidney biopsy reports.

Results: In total, 104 cases were diagnosed with IRGN on biopsy (mean age, 55.6 ± 15.6 years; male, n = 79 [76%]; median eGFR, 14.5 mL/min/1.73 m2), and 51 of 104 showed eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2. Among all the histologic features assessed, only percent tubules with red blood cell (RBC) casts showed statistical difference, being significantly higher in the lower-eGFR group (P = .004). Multivariable logistic regression analysis also showed that %tubules with RBC casts were associated with lower eGFR (odds ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.24; P = .01). Patients with 5% or more RBC casts (n = 31) showed a lower eGFR (P = .02) and a higher %cellular crescent (P < .001) compared with those with less than 5% RBC casts. Patients with concomitant anticoagulant therapy (n = 11) showed higher percentages of RBC casts than those without anticoagulants (P = .02).

Conclusions: Particular attention to the extent of RBC casts on kidney biopsy is recommended in patients with IRGN because these portend worse renal dysfunction, more so in patients requiring anticoagulation (including for hemodialysis) because they are especially vulnerable to developing anticoagulant-related nephropathy.

背景:感染相关性肾小球肾炎(IRGN)通常表现为增殖性免疫复合物性肾小球肾炎。发病时肾功能不全的程度各不相同。其与肾活检组织学特征的关系尚不清楚:研究IRGN活检时肾功能与组织学特征严重程度之间的相关性:设计:纳入我院经培养证实的 IRGN 病例,并根据估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)15 ml/min/1.73 m2 进行划分。从电子病历和肾活检报告中获取患者的人口统计学和病理学结果:结果:共有 104 例经活检确诊为 IRGN(平均年龄为 55.6 ± 15.6 岁;男性,n = 79 [76%];eGFR 中位数为 14.5 mL/min/1.73 m2),104 例中有 51 例得出了 eGFR 结论:建议IRGN患者特别注意肾活检中红细胞铸型的程度,因为这些铸型预示着更严重的肾功能障碍,尤其是需要抗凝治疗(包括血液透析)的患者,因为他们特别容易发生与抗凝剂相关的肾病。
{"title":"Correlation of Red Blood Cell Casts With Renal Dysfunction in Patients With Infection-Related Glomerulonephritis.","authors":"Mineaki Kitamura, Laura Biederman, Dalia Ibrahim, Tibor Nadasdy, Sergey V Brodsky, Anjali A Satoskar","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2022-0514-OA","DOIUrl":"10.5858/arpa.2022-0514-OA","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Infection-related glomerulonephritis (IRGN) usually manifests as a proliferative immune-complex glomerulonephritis. The degree of renal dysfunction at presentation can vary. Association with histologic features on kidney biopsy remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the correlation between renal function in IRGN at the time of biopsy and the severity of histologic features.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Culture-proven IRGN cases at our facility were included and divided based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 15 ml/min/1.73 m2. Patients' demographic and pathologic findings were obtained from electronic medical records and kidney biopsy reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 104 cases were diagnosed with IRGN on biopsy (mean age, 55.6 ± 15.6 years; male, n = 79 [76%]; median eGFR, 14.5 mL/min/1.73 m2), and 51 of 104 showed eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2. Among all the histologic features assessed, only percent tubules with red blood cell (RBC) casts showed statistical difference, being significantly higher in the lower-eGFR group (P = .004). Multivariable logistic regression analysis also showed that %tubules with RBC casts were associated with lower eGFR (odds ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.24; P = .01). Patients with 5% or more RBC casts (n = 31) showed a lower eGFR (P = .02) and a higher %cellular crescent (P < .001) compared with those with less than 5% RBC casts. Patients with concomitant anticoagulant therapy (n = 11) showed higher percentages of RBC casts than those without anticoagulants (P = .02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Particular attention to the extent of RBC casts on kidney biopsy is recommended in patients with IRGN because these portend worse renal dysfunction, more so in patients requiring anticoagulation (including for hemodialysis) because they are especially vulnerable to developing anticoagulant-related nephropathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8305,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10124079","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Atypical Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Patterns That Indicate Uncommon but Clinically Actionable EGFR Mutations in Lung Cancer. 非典型液滴数字聚合酶链反应模式表明肺癌中的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变并不常见,但在临床上却具有可操作性。
IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 Health Professions Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0088-OA
Adam Lechner, Anooja Rai, Vanesa Rojas-Rudilla, Yanan Kuang, Cloud P Paweletz, Lynette M Sholl, Fei Dong

Context: Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) is a sensitive method to detect common pathogenic EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Although targeted assays have not been specifically designed to detect them, uncommon EGFR mutations have been linked to response to targeted therapy.

Objective: To describe atypical ddPCR patterns that correspond to uncommon but clinically actionable EGFR mutations.

Design: A cohort of 1134 consecutive non-small cell lung cancers that underwent targeted next-generation sequencing was reviewed. Uncommon EGFR mutations involving probe binding sites were evaluated by ddPCR.

Results: Two hundred fifty-five of 1134 cancers (22.5%) harbored pathogenic EGFR mutations. One hundred eighty-six of 255 (72.9%) had canonical EGFR exon 19 deletion or exon 21 p.L858R variants designed for detection by ddPCR. An additional 25 of 255 cases (9.8%) had uncommon EGFR mutations within the probe-binding site, including 1 case with concurrent uncommon mutations in both exon 19 and exon 21. These mutations included uncommon EGFR exon 19 deletions (n = 6), EGFR exon 19 substitutions p.L747P (n = 3) and p.L747A (n = 1), dinucleotide substitutions leading to EGFR p.L858R (n = 5), EGFR exon 21 substitutions p.K860I (n = 1) and p.L861Q (n = 9), and EGFR p.[L858R;K860I] (n = 1). Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction generated atypical but reproducible signal for each of these uncommon variants.

Conclusions: Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction analysis of uncommon pathogenic EGFR variants can yield unique and reproducible results. Recognition of atypical patterns in EGFR ddPCR testing can prompt confirmatory molecular testing and aid appropriate targeted therapy selection for patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

背景:液滴数字聚合酶链反应(ddPCR)是检测非小细胞肺癌中常见表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)致病突变的灵敏方法。虽然还没有专门用于检测这些突变的靶向测定,但不常见的表皮生长因子受体突变与靶向治疗的反应有关:目的:描述与不常见但临床上可行的表皮生长因子受体突变相对应的非典型 ddPCR 模式:设计:研究人员回顾了1134例连续接受新一代靶向测序的非小细胞肺癌患者。通过 ddPCR 评估了涉及探针结合位点的不常见表皮生长因子受体突变:结果:1134 例癌症中有 255 例(22.5%)存在致病性表皮生长因子受体突变。255例癌症中有186例(72.9%)存在典型的表皮生长因子受体第19外显子缺失或第21外显子p.L858R变异,可通过ddPCR进行检测。在 255 个病例中,另有 25 个病例(9.8%)在探针结合位点内发生了不常见的表皮生长因子受体突变,其中 1 个病例的第 19 号外显子和第 21 号外显子同时发生了不常见的突变。这些突变包括不常见的表皮生长因子受体第19外显子缺失(n = 6)、表皮生长因子受体第19外显子置换p.L747P(n = 3)和p.L747A(n = 1)、导致表皮生长因子受体p.L858R的二核苷酸置换(n = 5)、表皮生长因子受体第21外显子置换p.K860I(n = 1)和p.L861Q(n = 9)以及表皮生长因子受体p.[L858R;K860I](n = 1)。液滴数字聚合酶链反应为这些不常见的变异产生了非典型但可重复的信号:结论:对不常见的致病性表皮生长因子受体变体进行液滴数字聚合酶链反应分析可产生独特且可重复的结果。识别表皮生长因子受体 ddPCR 检测中的非典型模式可促使进行确证分子检测,帮助非小细胞肺癌患者选择适当的靶向治疗。
{"title":"Atypical Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Patterns That Indicate Uncommon but Clinically Actionable EGFR Mutations in Lung Cancer.","authors":"Adam Lechner, Anooja Rai, Vanesa Rojas-Rudilla, Yanan Kuang, Cloud P Paweletz, Lynette M Sholl, Fei Dong","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0088-OA","DOIUrl":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0088-OA","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) is a sensitive method to detect common pathogenic EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Although targeted assays have not been specifically designed to detect them, uncommon EGFR mutations have been linked to response to targeted therapy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe atypical ddPCR patterns that correspond to uncommon but clinically actionable EGFR mutations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cohort of 1134 consecutive non-small cell lung cancers that underwent targeted next-generation sequencing was reviewed. Uncommon EGFR mutations involving probe binding sites were evaluated by ddPCR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred fifty-five of 1134 cancers (22.5%) harbored pathogenic EGFR mutations. One hundred eighty-six of 255 (72.9%) had canonical EGFR exon 19 deletion or exon 21 p.L858R variants designed for detection by ddPCR. An additional 25 of 255 cases (9.8%) had uncommon EGFR mutations within the probe-binding site, including 1 case with concurrent uncommon mutations in both exon 19 and exon 21. These mutations included uncommon EGFR exon 19 deletions (n = 6), EGFR exon 19 substitutions p.L747P (n = 3) and p.L747A (n = 1), dinucleotide substitutions leading to EGFR p.L858R (n = 5), EGFR exon 21 substitutions p.K860I (n = 1) and p.L861Q (n = 9), and EGFR p.[L858R;K860I] (n = 1). Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction generated atypical but reproducible signal for each of these uncommon variants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction analysis of uncommon pathogenic EGFR variants can yield unique and reproducible results. Recognition of atypical patterns in EGFR ddPCR testing can prompt confirmatory molecular testing and aid appropriate targeted therapy selection for patients with non-small cell lung cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":8305,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10483879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical Performance of the Line Immunoassay, Digital Liquid Chip Method, and Chemiluminescent Immunoassay for Detecting Specific Antinuclear Antibodies. 检测特异性抗核抗体的线性免疫测定法、数字液体芯片法和化学发光免疫测定法的临床表现。
IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 Health Professions Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2022-0331-OA
Zhenzhen Su, Li Wang, Xuedan Gao, Zhuochun Huang, Jing Hu, Bin Yang

Context: Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) against certain antigens are useful for identifying autoimmune disorders. Although new solid phase-based immunoassays have been developed for evaluating ANAs, the conventional line immunoassay (LIA) is commonly used in clinical practice.

Objective: To compare the clinical performance of 2 newly developed methods for detecting specific ANAs with LIA.

Design: Six hundred ninety-six serum samples were collected from 559 patients with autoimmune disease (AID) and 137 controls. The samples were screened by using the LIA, digital liquid chip method (DLCM), and chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) for specific ANAs. The agreement across assays and the clinical performance of each assay in diagnosing ANA-associated rheumatic diseases (AARDs) were evaluated.

Results: Almost perfect agreement was observed among all assays for anti-centromere protein B (κ = 0.85-0.97), anti-ribosome P (κ = 0.85-0.88), anti-SSA 52 (κ = 0.86-0.89), and anti-SSA 60 (κ = 0.89-0.91); moderate to substantial agreement was detected for the autoantibodies against Sm, Jo-1, ribonucleoprotein, Scl-70, and SSB (κ = 0.55-0.80). LIA exhibited better sensitivity for diagnosing AARDs, while DLCM and CLIA demonstrated higher specificity. In the subset of AIDs, especially systemic lupus erythematosus, antibody positive percentages varied greatly between assays.

Conclusions: The 3 assays showed comparable qualitative agreement; however, the standardization of testing for ANAs remains challenging owing to intermanufacturer variations. Moreover, DLCM and CLIA exhibited better specificity in distinguishing non-AID individuals, whereas LIA was more sensitive in diagnosing AARDs.

背景:针对某些抗原的抗核抗体(ANAs)有助于鉴别自身免疫性疾病。尽管目前已开发出新的固相免疫测定法来评估 ANA,但传统的线性免疫测定法(LIA)在临床实践中仍被普遍使用:比较两种新开发的检测特异性 ANA 的方法与 LIA 的临床性能:从 559 名自身免疫性疾病 (AID) 患者和 137 名对照组患者中采集了 696 份血清样本。采用 LIA、数字液体芯片法 (DLCM) 和化学发光免疫分析法 (CLIA) 对样本进行了特异性 ANA 筛选。评估了各种检测方法之间的一致性以及每种检测方法在诊断 ANA 相关风湿性疾病(AARDs)方面的临床表现:结果:在抗中心粒蛋白B(κ = 0.85-0.97)、抗核糖体P(κ = 0.85-0.88)、抗SSA 52(κ = 0.86-0.89)和抗SSA 60(κ = 0.89-0.91)方面,所有检测方法几乎完全一致;在抗Sm、Jo-1、核糖核蛋白、Scl-70和SSB的自身抗体(κ = 0.55-0.80)方面,检测结果基本一致。LIA 在诊断 AARDs 方面表现出更高的灵敏度,而 DLCM 和 CLIA 则表现出更高的特异性。在艾滋病子集中,尤其是系统性红斑狼疮,不同检测方法的抗体阳性率差异很大:结论:三种检测方法显示出相似的定性一致性;然而,由于生产商之间的差异,ANA 检测的标准化仍具有挑战性。此外,DLCM 和 CLIA 在区分非艾滋病患者方面表现出更好的特异性,而 LIA 在诊断 AARDs 方面更为敏感。
{"title":"Clinical Performance of the Line Immunoassay, Digital Liquid Chip Method, and Chemiluminescent Immunoassay for Detecting Specific Antinuclear Antibodies.","authors":"Zhenzhen Su, Li Wang, Xuedan Gao, Zhuochun Huang, Jing Hu, Bin Yang","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2022-0331-OA","DOIUrl":"10.5858/arpa.2022-0331-OA","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) against certain antigens are useful for identifying autoimmune disorders. Although new solid phase-based immunoassays have been developed for evaluating ANAs, the conventional line immunoassay (LIA) is commonly used in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the clinical performance of 2 newly developed methods for detecting specific ANAs with LIA.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Six hundred ninety-six serum samples were collected from 559 patients with autoimmune disease (AID) and 137 controls. The samples were screened by using the LIA, digital liquid chip method (DLCM), and chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) for specific ANAs. The agreement across assays and the clinical performance of each assay in diagnosing ANA-associated rheumatic diseases (AARDs) were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Almost perfect agreement was observed among all assays for anti-centromere protein B (κ = 0.85-0.97), anti-ribosome P (κ = 0.85-0.88), anti-SSA 52 (κ = 0.86-0.89), and anti-SSA 60 (κ = 0.89-0.91); moderate to substantial agreement was detected for the autoantibodies against Sm, Jo-1, ribonucleoprotein, Scl-70, and SSB (κ = 0.55-0.80). LIA exhibited better sensitivity for diagnosing AARDs, while DLCM and CLIA demonstrated higher specificity. In the subset of AIDs, especially systemic lupus erythematosus, antibody positive percentages varied greatly between assays.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 3 assays showed comparable qualitative agreement; however, the standardization of testing for ANAs remains challenging owing to intermanufacturer variations. Moreover, DLCM and CLIA exhibited better specificity in distinguishing non-AID individuals, whereas LIA was more sensitive in diagnosing AARDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8305,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10082588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
RNA Sequencing for Solid Tumor Fusion Gene Detection: Proficiency Testing Practice and Performance Comparison. 用于实体瘤融合基因检测的 RNA 测序:能力验证实践与性能比较。
IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 Health Professions Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0047-CP
Julia A Bridge, Kevin C Halling, Joel T Moncur, Rhona J Souers, Meera R Hameed, Helen Fernandes, Angshumoy Roy, Lea Surrey, Laura J Tafe, Patricia Vasalos, Dolores H Lopez-Terrada

Context: Next-generation sequencing-based approaches using RNA have increasingly been used by clinical laboratories for the detection of fusion genes, intragenic rearrangements, and exon-skipping events. Correspondingly, the College of American Pathologists (CAP) has advanced RNA sequencing proficiency testing (PT) to ensure optimal performance of these assays.

Objective: To report on laboratory performance and practices of RNA sequencing for the detection of fusion genes, intragenic rearrangements, and exon-skipping events using CAP PT data from 8 mailings (2018-A through 2021-B).

Design: CAP PT RNA sequencing program results from 153 laboratories across 24 proficiency test specimens, interrogating 22 distinct engineered fusion transcripts, were analyzed for correct identification of the fusion event, associated performance variables, and laboratory practices.

Results: Overall, the 4-year program detection rate (sensitivity) was 95.5% (1486 of 1556 results). False-negative rates were 3.6% (53 of 1463) and 18.3% (17 of 93) for fusion gene and intragenic rearrangement/exon-skipping events, respectively. Only 19 false-positive results were reported among the 8 PT mailings, and most were likely the result of preanalytical or postanalytical errors. There were no practice characteristics (eg, instrumentation, sequencing method) significantly associated with the fusion detection results.

Conclusions: These data reveal a high overall sensitivity and specificity for fusion gene detection by participating laboratories using clinical RNA sequencing. Performance was comparable across all laboratories, regardless of methodology. The fraction of false-negative results for intragenic rearrangement/exon-skipping events was greater than that for the chimeric fusion genes. False-negative results could not be attributed to any specific practice characteristics.

背景:临床实验室越来越多地使用基于下一代RNA测序的方法来检测融合基因、基因内重排和外显子缺失事件。相应地,美国病理学家学会(CAP)推进了 RNA 测序能力验证(PT),以确保这些检测方法的最佳性能:利用 8 次邮件(2018-A 至 2021-B)中的 CAP PT 数据,报告用于检测融合基因、基因内重排和外显子跳断事件的 RNA 测序的实验室性能和实践:对来自 153 个实验室的 24 份能力验证样本的 CAP PT RNA 测序项目结果进行了分析,其中涉及 22 个不同的工程融合转录本,分析了融合事件的正确识别、相关性能变量和实验室实践:总体而言,4 年计划的检测率(灵敏度)为 95.5%(1556 项结果中的 1486 项)。融合基因和基因内重排/外显子缺失事件的假阴性率分别为 3.6%(1463 项中的 53 项)和 18.3%(93 项中的 17 项)。在 8 份 PT 邮件中,仅报告了 19 个假阳性结果,其中大部分可能是分析前或分析后出错所致。没有任何实践特征(如仪器、测序方法)与融合检测结果显著相关:这些数据显示,参与研究的实验室使用临床RNA测序法检测融合基因的总体灵敏度和特异性都很高。无论采用哪种方法,所有实验室的检测结果都具有可比性。基因内重排/外显子缺失事件的假阴性结果比例高于嵌合型融合基因。假阴性结果不能归因于任何特定的实践特点。
{"title":"RNA Sequencing for Solid Tumor Fusion Gene Detection: Proficiency Testing Practice and Performance Comparison.","authors":"Julia A Bridge, Kevin C Halling, Joel T Moncur, Rhona J Souers, Meera R Hameed, Helen Fernandes, Angshumoy Roy, Lea Surrey, Laura J Tafe, Patricia Vasalos, Dolores H Lopez-Terrada","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0047-CP","DOIUrl":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0047-CP","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Next-generation sequencing-based approaches using RNA have increasingly been used by clinical laboratories for the detection of fusion genes, intragenic rearrangements, and exon-skipping events. Correspondingly, the College of American Pathologists (CAP) has advanced RNA sequencing proficiency testing (PT) to ensure optimal performance of these assays.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To report on laboratory performance and practices of RNA sequencing for the detection of fusion genes, intragenic rearrangements, and exon-skipping events using CAP PT data from 8 mailings (2018-A through 2021-B).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>CAP PT RNA sequencing program results from 153 laboratories across 24 proficiency test specimens, interrogating 22 distinct engineered fusion transcripts, were analyzed for correct identification of the fusion event, associated performance variables, and laboratory practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the 4-year program detection rate (sensitivity) was 95.5% (1486 of 1556 results). False-negative rates were 3.6% (53 of 1463) and 18.3% (17 of 93) for fusion gene and intragenic rearrangement/exon-skipping events, respectively. Only 19 false-positive results were reported among the 8 PT mailings, and most were likely the result of preanalytical or postanalytical errors. There were no practice characteristics (eg, instrumentation, sequencing method) significantly associated with the fusion detection results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data reveal a high overall sensitivity and specificity for fusion gene detection by participating laboratories using clinical RNA sequencing. Performance was comparable across all laboratories, regardless of methodology. The fraction of false-negative results for intragenic rearrangement/exon-skipping events was greater than that for the chimeric fusion genes. False-negative results could not be attributed to any specific practice characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":8305,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9933558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Loose Tumor Cells in Pulmonary Arteries of Lung Adenocarcinoma Resection Specimens: No Correlation With Survival, Despite High Prevalence. 肺腺癌切除标本肺动脉中的松散肿瘤细胞:尽管发病率很高,但与存活率无关
IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 Health Professions Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0009-OA
Hans Blaauwgeers, Federica Filipello, Birgit Lissenberg-Witte, Claudio Doglioni, Teodora Radonic, Idris Bahce, Yuko Minami, Andreas Schonau, Julien P L Vincenten, Adrianus A J Smit, Chris Dickhoff, Erik Thunnissen

Context: Loose tumor cells and tumor cell clusters can be recognized in the lumen of intratumoral pulmonary arteries of resected non-small cell lung cancer specimens. It is unclear whether these should be considered tumor-emboli, and as such could predict a worsened prognosis.

Objective: To investigate the nature and prognostic impact of pulmonary artery intraluminal tumor cells.

Design: This multicenter study involved an exploratory pilot study and a validation study from 3 institutions. For the exploratory pilot study, a retrospective pulmonary resection cohort of primary adenocarcinomas, diagnosed between November 2007 and November 2010, were scored for the presence of tumor cells, as well as potentially other cells in the intravascular spaces, using hematoxylin-eosin and cytokeratin 7 (CK7) stains. In the validation part, 2 retrospective cohorts of resected pulmonary adenocarcinomas, between January 2011 and December 2016, were included. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) data were collected.

Results: In the pilot study, CK7+ intravascular cells, mainly tumor cells, were present in 23 of 33 patients (69.7%). The 5-year OS for patients with intravascular tumor cells was 61%, compared with 40% for patients without intravascular tumor cells (P = .19). In the validation study, CK7+ intravascular tumor cells were present in 41 of 70 patients (58.6%). The 5-year RFS for patients with intravascular tumor cells was 80.0%, compared with 80.6% in patients without intravascular tumor cells (P = .52). The 5-year OS rates were, respectively, 82.8% and 71.6% (P = .16).

Conclusions: Loose tumor cells in pulmonary arterial lumina were found in most non-small cell lung cancer resection specimens and were not associated with a worse RFS or OS. Therefore, most probably they represent an artifact.

背景:在切除的非小细胞肺癌标本的瘤内肺动脉管腔中可发现松散的肿瘤细胞和肿瘤细胞簇。目前尚不清楚这些是否应被视为肿瘤栓子,并因此可预测预后恶化:研究肺动脉腔内肿瘤细胞的性质及其对预后的影响:这项多中心研究包括一项探索性试验研究和一项验证研究,分别来自 3 家机构。在探索性试点研究中,采用苏木精-伊红和细胞角蛋白7(CK7)染色法,对2007年11月至2010年11月期间确诊的原发性腺癌的回顾性肺切除队列中是否存在肿瘤细胞以及血管内间隙中可能存在的其他细胞进行评分。在验证部分,纳入了 2011 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月间切除的肺腺癌的两个回顾性队列。研究收集了无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)数据:在试点研究中,33例患者中有23例(69.7%)存在CK7+血管内细胞,主要是肿瘤细胞。有血管内肿瘤细胞的患者的5年生存率为61%,而没有血管内肿瘤细胞的患者的5年生存率为40%(P = .19)。在验证研究中,70 例患者中有 41 例(58.6%)存在 CK7+ 血管内肿瘤细胞。有血管内肿瘤细胞的患者的5年RFS为80.0%,而无血管内肿瘤细胞的患者为80.6%(P = .52)。5年OS率分别为82.8%和71.6%(P = .16):结论:大多数非小细胞肺癌切除标本中都发现了肺动脉管腔内的松散肿瘤细胞,但它们与较差的RFS或OS无关。因此,它们很可能是一种假象。
{"title":"Loose Tumor Cells in Pulmonary Arteries of Lung Adenocarcinoma Resection Specimens: No Correlation With Survival, Despite High Prevalence.","authors":"Hans Blaauwgeers, Federica Filipello, Birgit Lissenberg-Witte, Claudio Doglioni, Teodora Radonic, Idris Bahce, Yuko Minami, Andreas Schonau, Julien P L Vincenten, Adrianus A J Smit, Chris Dickhoff, Erik Thunnissen","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0009-OA","DOIUrl":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0009-OA","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Loose tumor cells and tumor cell clusters can be recognized in the lumen of intratumoral pulmonary arteries of resected non-small cell lung cancer specimens. It is unclear whether these should be considered tumor-emboli, and as such could predict a worsened prognosis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the nature and prognostic impact of pulmonary artery intraluminal tumor cells.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This multicenter study involved an exploratory pilot study and a validation study from 3 institutions. For the exploratory pilot study, a retrospective pulmonary resection cohort of primary adenocarcinomas, diagnosed between November 2007 and November 2010, were scored for the presence of tumor cells, as well as potentially other cells in the intravascular spaces, using hematoxylin-eosin and cytokeratin 7 (CK7) stains. In the validation part, 2 retrospective cohorts of resected pulmonary adenocarcinomas, between January 2011 and December 2016, were included. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) data were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the pilot study, CK7+ intravascular cells, mainly tumor cells, were present in 23 of 33 patients (69.7%). The 5-year OS for patients with intravascular tumor cells was 61%, compared with 40% for patients without intravascular tumor cells (P = .19). In the validation study, CK7+ intravascular tumor cells were present in 41 of 70 patients (58.6%). The 5-year RFS for patients with intravascular tumor cells was 80.0%, compared with 80.6% in patients without intravascular tumor cells (P = .52). The 5-year OS rates were, respectively, 82.8% and 71.6% (P = .16).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Loose tumor cells in pulmonary arterial lumina were found in most non-small cell lung cancer resection specimens and were not associated with a worse RFS or OS. Therefore, most probably they represent an artifact.</p>","PeriodicalId":8305,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10459255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Don't Fear the Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning for Prostate Cancer Detection in Pathology. 不要惧怕人工智能:病理学中前列腺癌检测机器学习的系统回顾。
IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 Health Professions Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2022-0460-RA
Aaryn Frewing, Alexander B Gibson, Richard Robertson, Paul M Urie, Dennis Della Corte

Context: Automated prostate cancer detection using machine learning technology has led to speculation that pathologists will soon be replaced by algorithms. This review covers the development of machine learning algorithms and their reported effectiveness specific to prostate cancer detection and Gleason grading.

Objective: To examine current algorithms regarding their accuracy and classification abilities. We provide a general explanation of the technology and how it is being used in clinical practice. The challenges to the application of machine learning algorithms in clinical practice are also discussed.

Data sources: The literature for this review was identified and collected using a systematic search. Criteria were established prior to the sorting process to effectively direct the selection of studies. A 4-point system was implemented to rank the papers according to their relevancy. For papers accepted as relevant to our metrics, all cited and citing studies were also reviewed. Studies were then categorized based on whether they implemented binary or multi-class classification methods. Data were extracted from papers that contained accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), or κ values in the context of prostate cancer detection. The results were visually summarized to present accuracy trends between classification abilities.

Conclusions: It is more difficult to achieve high accuracy metrics for multiclassification tasks than for binary tasks. The clinical implementation of an algorithm that can assign a Gleason grade to clinical whole slide images (WSIs) remains elusive. Machine learning technology is currently not able to replace pathologists but can serve as an important safeguard against misdiagnosis.

背景:使用机器学习技术进行前列腺癌自动检测已引发了病理学家很快将被算法取代的猜测。本综述涉及机器学习算法的发展及其在前列腺癌检测和格里森分级方面的有效性:目的:研究当前算法的准确性和分类能力。我们将对该技术及其在临床实践中的应用进行总体解释。我们还讨论了在临床实践中应用机器学习算法所面临的挑战:本综述的文献是通过系统搜索确定和收集的。在分类过程之前,我们制定了标准,以有效指导研究的选择。根据论文的相关性,我们采用了一个 4 点系统对论文进行排序。对于被认为与我们的衡量标准相关的论文,我们还审查了所有被引用和引用的研究。然后,根据研究是否采用了二元或多类分类方法对其进行分类。从包含前列腺癌检测准确率、曲线下面积(AUC)或κ值的论文中提取数据。对结果进行了直观总结,以呈现不同分类能力之间的准确率趋势:结论:与二元任务相比,多重分类任务更难获得高准确度指标。能够为临床全切片图像(WSI)分配格里森分级的算法的临床实施仍然遥遥无期。机器学习技术目前还不能取代病理学家,但可以作为防止误诊的重要保障。
{"title":"Don't Fear the Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning for Prostate Cancer Detection in Pathology.","authors":"Aaryn Frewing, Alexander B Gibson, Richard Robertson, Paul M Urie, Dennis Della Corte","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2022-0460-RA","DOIUrl":"10.5858/arpa.2022-0460-RA","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Automated prostate cancer detection using machine learning technology has led to speculation that pathologists will soon be replaced by algorithms. This review covers the development of machine learning algorithms and their reported effectiveness specific to prostate cancer detection and Gleason grading.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine current algorithms regarding their accuracy and classification abilities. We provide a general explanation of the technology and how it is being used in clinical practice. The challenges to the application of machine learning algorithms in clinical practice are also discussed.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>The literature for this review was identified and collected using a systematic search. Criteria were established prior to the sorting process to effectively direct the selection of studies. A 4-point system was implemented to rank the papers according to their relevancy. For papers accepted as relevant to our metrics, all cited and citing studies were also reviewed. Studies were then categorized based on whether they implemented binary or multi-class classification methods. Data were extracted from papers that contained accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), or κ values in the context of prostate cancer detection. The results were visually summarized to present accuracy trends between classification abilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is more difficult to achieve high accuracy metrics for multiclassification tasks than for binary tasks. The clinical implementation of an algorithm that can assign a Gleason grade to clinical whole slide images (WSIs) remains elusive. Machine learning technology is currently not able to replace pathologists but can serve as an important safeguard against misdiagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8305,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10082587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Cognitive Framework Behind Modern Neuropathology. 现代神经病理学背后的认知框架。
IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 Health Professions Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0209-RA
José Javier Otero

Context: In 2021 the World Health Organization distributed a new classification of central nervous system tumors that incorporated modern testing modalities in the diagnosis. Although universally accepted as a scientifically superior system, this schema has created controversy because its deployment globally is challenging in the best of circumstances and impossible in resource-poor health care ecosystems. Compounding this problem is the significant challenge that neuropathologists with expertise in central nervous system tumors are rare.

Objective: To demonstrate diagnostic use of simple unsupervised machine learning techniques using publicly available data sets. I also discuss some potential solutions to the deployment of neuropathology classification in health care ecosystems burdened by this classification schema.

Data sources: The Cancer Genome Atlas RNA sequencing data from low-grade and high-grade gliomas.

Conclusions: Methylation-based classification will be unable to solve all diagnostic problems in neuropathology. Information theory quantifications generate focused workflows in pathology, resulting in prevention of ordering unnecessary tests and identifying biomarkers that facilitate diagnosis.

背景:2021 年,世界卫生组织发布了新的中枢神经系统肿瘤分类法,将现代检测模式纳入诊断。尽管该分类法被普遍认为是科学上更优越的系统,但却引发了争议,因为在最好的情况下,在全球范围内采用该分类法具有挑战性,而在资源匮乏的医疗保健生态系统中则是不可能的。使这一问题更加复杂的是,具有中枢神经系统肿瘤专业知识的神经病理学家非常罕见:目的:利用公开数据集展示简单的无监督机器学习技术在诊断中的应用。我还将讨论一些潜在的解决方案,以便在受这种分类模式影响的医疗保健生态系统中部署神经病理学分类:癌症基因组图谱》(Cancer Genome Atlas)中低级别和高级别胶质瘤的 RNA 测序数据:基于甲基化的分类无法解决神经病理学中的所有诊断问题。信息论量化可生成病理学中重点突出的工作流程,从而避免开具不必要的检验单,并确定有助于诊断的生物标记物。
{"title":"The Cognitive Framework Behind Modern Neuropathology.","authors":"José Javier Otero","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0209-RA","DOIUrl":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0209-RA","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>In 2021 the World Health Organization distributed a new classification of central nervous system tumors that incorporated modern testing modalities in the diagnosis. Although universally accepted as a scientifically superior system, this schema has created controversy because its deployment globally is challenging in the best of circumstances and impossible in resource-poor health care ecosystems. Compounding this problem is the significant challenge that neuropathologists with expertise in central nervous system tumors are rare.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To demonstrate diagnostic use of simple unsupervised machine learning techniques using publicly available data sets. I also discuss some potential solutions to the deployment of neuropathology classification in health care ecosystems burdened by this classification schema.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>The Cancer Genome Atlas RNA sequencing data from low-grade and high-grade gliomas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Methylation-based classification will be unable to solve all diagnostic problems in neuropathology. Information theory quantifications generate focused workflows in pathology, resulting in prevention of ordering unnecessary tests and identifying biomarkers that facilitate diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8305,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10202303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1